The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Understanding the benefits of providing peer feedback: how students respond to peers’ texts of varying quality
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The act of providing peer feedback also requires students to actively (re)consider the assignment criteria, which may improve their own subsequent writing performance (Flower et al. 1986; Patchan and Schunn 2015).”
From The impact of formative peer feedback on higher education students' academic writing: a Meta-Analysis (2019) · cites this paper as Patchan and Schunn 2015
In the citing paper
“With respect to peer-feedback processes, it may help students formulate high-quality feedback messages or deeply elaborate on the feedback they receive from their peers (Lui & Andrade, 2022;Patchan & Schunn, 2015).”
From Enhancing the Peer-Feedback Process Through Instructional Support: A Meta-Analysis (2025) · cites this paper as Patchan & Schunn, 2015
In the citing paper
“With respect to peer-feedback processes, it may help students formulate high-quality feedback messages or deeply elaborate on the feedback they receive from their peers (Lui & Andrade, 2022;Patchan & Schunn, 2015).”
From Enhancing the Peer-Feedback Process Through Instructional Support: A Meta-Analysis (2025) · cites this paper as Patchan & Schunn, 2015
Citations
Cites
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
Muller, K. E., & Cohen, J. (1989) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1270020 · Cited by 99,603
Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
Cohen, J. (1990) · Computers Environment and Urban Systems · doi:10.1016/0198-9715(90)90050-4 · Cited by 65,417
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.).
Lachenbruch, P. A., & Cohen, J. (1989) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2290095 · Cited by 37,421
Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.254 · Cited by 5,882
(1991) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.28-5376 · Cited by 4,218
Toward an instance theory of automatization.
Logan, G. D. (1988) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.95.4.492 · Cited by 3,466
An Integrated Theory of the Mind.
Anderson, J. R., Bothell, D., Byrne, M. D., Douglass, S., Lebiere, C. J., & Qin, Y. (2004) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.111.4.1036 · Cited by 3,153
Cognitive Skills and Their Acquisition
Anderson, J. R. (2013) · Psychology Press eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203728178 · Cited by 2,929
The Atomic Components of Thought
Anderson, J. R., & Lebiere, C. J. (2014) · Psychology Press eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315805696 · Cited by 2,181
Self‐Explanations: How Students Study and Use Examples in Learning to Solve Problems
Chi, M. T. H., Bassok, M., Lewis, M. W., Reimann, P., & Glaser, R. (1989) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1207/s15516709cog1302_1 · Cited by 1,714
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Patchan, M. M., Schunn, C. D., & Correnti, R. J. (under review). The nature of feedback—revisited: How feedback features affect students’ willingness and ability to revise.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–181 of 181
Feedback Matters: Self-and-Peer Assessment Made Better with Instructional Interventions
Huang, W., Berry, F., Exter, M., & Wynkoop, R. (2024) · ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition · doi:10.18260/1-2--40953 · Cited by 5
Krause, M., Schiöberg, D., & Smeddinck, J. D. (2018) · CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA) · doi:10.1145/3170427.3174351 · Cited by 5
Li, L. L., Mao, G., Zhang, L., & Ying, J. (2025) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-025-13849-2 · Cited by 4
Aben, J. E. J., Lara, M. M., Timmermans, A. C., Dingyloudi, F., & Strijbos, J.-W. (2024) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-024-09660-0 · Cited by 4
Galeboe, K. A., Moalosi, R., Rapitsenyane, Y., & Ruele, V. (2025) · Discover Education · doi:10.1007/s44217-025-00604-5 · Cited by 4
A Thematic Analysis of Factors Influencing Student’s Peer-Feedback Orientation
Kasch, J., van Rosmalen, P., & Kalz, M. (2023) · Social interaction in learning and development · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-29411-2_12 · Cited by 4
Chen, Y., Li, M., & Jong, M. S. (2025) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.1177/07356331251342672 · Cited by 7
Franz, L., Herzog, M., Katzlinger, E., & Stabauer, M. (2018) · International Conference on Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training (ITHET) · doi:10.1109/ithet.2018.8424796 · Cited by 4
Abbas, A., Haruna, H., Ar, A. Y., & Radovanović, D. (2023) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/978-1-80382-525-020231010 · Cited by 4
A Study of Facebook-Based Peer Comments on L2 Writing
Ho, P. V. P., & Hoai, A. N. T. (2021) · Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research/Advances in social science, education and humanities research · doi:10.2991/assehr.k.210226.014 · Cited by 5
Peer review in early academic writing: impact vs. students’ beliefs
Boillos, M. M. (2024) · Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching · doi:10.1080/17501229.2024.2311836 · Cited by 3
How reliable and valid is peer evaluation in adolescents’ L2 argumentative writing?
Li, A. W., & Graham, S. (2026) · Assessing Writing: An International Journal · doi:10.1016/j.asw.2025.100992 · Cited by 5
Tsan, J., Butler, C., Gonzalez-Maldonado, D., Liu, J., Thomas, C., & Franklin, D. M. (2023) · ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research (ICER) · doi:10.1145/3568813.3600137 · Cited by 3
Peer feedback and learning: a case study with 8th-grade Portuguese students
Asper, G., Faria, C., Serra, P., & Galvão, C. (2024) · Education 3-13 · doi:10.1080/03004279.2024.2364610 · Cited by 6
Kooperationsskripts beim technologieunterstützten Lernen
Kiemer, K., Wekerle, C., & Kollar, I. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-54368-9_29 · Cited by 3
The Impact of Enhanced Teammate Evaluations on Important Individual and Team Outcomes
Eddy, E. R., D’Abate, C. P., & Costello, M. L. (2019) · Journal of Educational and Developmental Psychology · doi:10.5539/jedp.v9n2p158 · Cited by 3
Successful Undergraduate-level Experiential Learning Projects
Hall, M., Goettle, A., Carson, C., Collicott, J., Dietz, K., & Smith, K. (2020) · Conference on Information Technology Education · doi:10.1145/3368308.3415387 · Cited by 3
Giving Feedback to Peers in an Online Inquiry-Learning Environment
Dmoshinskaia, N., & Gijlers, H. (2023) · Social interaction in learning and development · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-29411-2_13 · Cited by 3
Zaky, H. (2021) · SN Social Sciences · doi:10.1007/s43545-021-00258-8 · Cited by 3
Exploring Assessment Literacy of Tertiary-Level Teachers in Bangladesh
Khan, R. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-19-6458-9_22 · Cited by 2
Manzi, W. I., & Moreeng, B. B. (2023) · E-Journal of Humanities Arts and Social Sciences · doi:10.38159/ehass.2023463 · Cited by 2
Long, C. P. (2018) · Public Philosophy Journal · doi:10.59522/ddvt8870 · Cited by 2
Ai Generated vs. Peer Feedback in Esl Writing:Effects on Writing Skill, Self-Efficacy, And EnjoymentPreprint
Fang, Y. G., Tan, Y., Zuo, C., & Boubaker, A. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5115438 · Cited by 2
Villa, S. C., Craig, S. D., Zakhidov, D., & Zielke, M. A. (2021) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/1071181321651253 · Cited by 1
Comparing trained EFL peer reviewers’ feedback: From claim to reality
Hanjani, A. M. (2024) · Assessing Writing · doi:10.1016/j.asw.2024.100836 · Cited by 2
Daoud, S., Hussein, E. T., Taha, S., & Al-Namer, A.-S. (2024) · World Journal of English Language · doi:10.5430/wjel.v14n4p215 · Cited by 1
Ocampo, J. C. G., Panadero, E., Zamorano, D., & Sánchez‐Iglesias, I. (2025) · Assessing Writing · doi:10.1016/j.asw.2025.100987 · Cited by 1
Academic ability generates better quality feedback: Evidence from PeerWise assessments
Huang, W., Stephens, J. M., & Brown, G. (2026) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2026.101566 · Cited by 1
A Coding Framework for Analyzing the Types and Levels of Peer Feedback
Lee, S., & Ha, M. (2026) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/21582440261418083 · Cited by 1
Supportive Assessment and Feedback Practices
Tuomainen, S. (2023) · Springer texts in education · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-39844-5_6 · Cited by 1
Kim, S. (2023) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/13621688231193074 · Cited by 1
Mitchum, C., Rodrigo, R., & Koenig, S. (2024) · College Composition and Communication · doi:10.58680/ccc2024753513 · Cited by 1
Triadic oral peer feedback: Does EFL learners’ L2 proficiency pairing play a role?
Zhao, N., Tian, L., & Carhill‐Poza, A. (2024) · International Journal of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1111/ijal.12598 · Cited by 2
Zong, Z., & Schunn, C. D. (2025) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.104825 · Cited by 3
Self-citationPeer feedback modelling needs in online higher education: An exploratory study
Henderikx, M., Vrieling, E., Molin, F., & Nadolski, R. J. (2025) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2025.101464 · Cited by 9
Micro-internships on the Margins
Hall, M., Friend, M., & Krause, M. (2018) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-92052-8_38 · Cited by 2
동료평가 정확도 향상 방안의 비교: 평가 기준에 대한 학생들 간 토론 대 전문가 평가 사례 제시
Park, J. A., & Park, J. (2019) · 인지과학 · doi:10.19066/cogsci.2019.30.4.001 · Cited by 1
Eika, E. (2021) · English Linguistics Research · doi:10.5430/elr.v10n1p10 · Cited by 1
Kooperationsskripts beim technologieunterstützten Lernen
Kiemer, K., Wekerle, C., & Kollar, I. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-54373-3_29-1 · Cited by 1
Practice and Efficacy of Peer Writing Feedback in a Large First-Year Engineering Course
Ekoniak, & Roman, M. R. (2018) · VTechWorks (Virginia Tech)
Busstra, M. C., Garcia, F. K., Hettinga, K. A., Huijgen, L., Gresnigt, M. C., & Hintemann, B. (2019) · International Conference on Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training (ITHET) · doi:10.1109/ithet46829.2019.8937372
Research on the Teaching of College English Writing
Wang, X., Jiang, X. S., & Li, X. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Education, Language and Inter-cultural Communication (ELIC 2020) · doi:10.2991/assehr.k.201127.043
Dmoshinskaia, N. (2020) · doi:10.3990/1.9789036551175
Can Students Learn from Grading Erroneous Computer Programs?
Paredes, Y. V., & Hsiao, I. (2021) · IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT) · doi:10.1109/icalt52272.2021.00070
Research on the types and adoption of peer feedback integrated with interdisciplinary collaboration
Kuang, S., Xu, Z., Gui, J., & Deng, J. (2021) · International Symposium on Educational Technology · doi:10.1109/iset52350.2021.00014
Sunzuma, G., Zezekwa, N., Gwizangwe, I., & Zinyeka, G. (2022) · Pedagogical Research · doi:10.29333/pr/12097
Chen, J. (2022) · International Journal of English Language Studies · doi:10.32996/ijels.2022.4.4.4
Garro, M., Schirinzi, M., Napoli, G. D., & Novara, C. (2023) · Gazzetta Medica Italiana Archivio per le Scienze Mediche · doi:10.23736/s0393-3660.22.04955-5
Suciati, S., Elsa, E., Silitonga, L. M., Lin, J., & Wu, T. (2023) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-40113-8_58
McCook, N. (2023) · The WAC Clearinghouse; University Press of Colorado eBooks · doi:10.37514/per-b.2023.1961.2.06 · Cited by 2
Interrogating Peer Review as �Proxy:� Reframing Peer Response within Connective Practice
Halasek, K. (2023) · The WAC Clearinghouse; University Press of Colorado eBooks · doi:10.37514/per-b.2023.1961.2.04 · Cited by 1
Pallo, V. (2023) · The WAC Clearinghouse; University Press of Colorado eBooks · doi:10.37514/per-b.2023.1961.2.09 · Cited by 1
Rethinking and Reframing Peer Review
Jackson, P., & Weaver, C. (2023) · The WAC Clearinghouse; University Press of Colorado eBooks · doi:10.37514/per-b.2023.1961.1.3 · Cited by 1
Chapter 5. Peer Persuasion: An Ethos-Based Theory of Identification and Audience Awareness
Stanton, C. (2023) · The WAC Clearinghouse; University Press of Colorado eBooks · doi:10.37514/per-b.2023.1961.2.05 · Cited by 1
Academic Writing Training Programs to Developing Teachers’ Writing Skills for Publication
Karolina, V., Bahari, Y., Rustiyarso, R., Zakso, A., & Barella, Y. (2023) · Edumaspul - Jurnal Pendidikan · doi:10.33487/edumaspul.v7i2.6702 · Cited by 2
Käpp, K., & Tragel, I. (2024) · Eesti Rakenduslingvistika Ühingu aastaraamat Estonian Papers in Applied Linguistics · doi:10.5128/erya20.05 · Cited by 2
Emekako, R., Ajose, D. J., & Shemfe, O. A. (2024) · E-Journal of Humanities Arts and Social Sciences · doi:10.38159/ehass.2024568
Jiao, J., Jamaludin, K. A., & Nasri, N. M. (2024) · International Journal of Education and Humanities · doi:10.54097/w7b99a31
Impact of Providing Peer Feedback—An Empirical Study on Web-Based Peer Review in English Writing
陈, 思. (2024) · Advances in Education · doi:10.12677/ae.2024.146962
An inductive approach to developing students’ awareness of useful written peer feedback
Lorenzen, H., Jacobsen, D., & Ellegaard, M. (2025) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2025.2501685
Friendly Controversy: Synergistic Scaffolding for Practices of Providing Peer Critique
Zhou, J., Lin, Q., Hmelo‐Silver, C. E., Danish, J. A., Duncan, R. G., Chinn, C. A., & Desai, A. (2025) · Computer-supported collaborative learning/The Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Conference · doi:10.22318/cscl2025.240067
Examining Critical Factors in Selecting AI Tools for Educational Success
Madanchian, M., & Taherdoost, H. (2025) · Procedia Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2025.07.111 · Cited by 4
Shulgina, G., Адамович, К., Zhang, H., Fanguy, M., Baldwin, M., & Costley, J. (2025) · Active Learning in Higher Education · doi:10.1177/14697874251389104
Naimnule, M., Kehi, Y. J., & Handayani, R. (2025) · VYGOTSKY · doi:10.30736/voj.v7i2.1217
Pieters, J., Verstegen, D. M. L., Dolmans, D. H. J. M., Warmenhoven, F. C., & Everdingen, M. H. J. V. D. B.-V. (2021) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.14708042
Shiny, K. G., Vijayan, B. L., Thomas, T. G., Maheswary, U., & Thomas, C. (2026) · Studies in systems, decision and control · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-10016-0_69
Abo, A. L., Wubshet, H., & Abeba, B. D. (2026) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2026.106612
Qin, W., Xu, F., Gu, C., Xiaomeng, Y. A. N. G., Yu, Y., Peng, J., Li, J., & Hu, B. Y. (2026) · Thinking Skills and Creativity · doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2026.102215 · Cited by 1
Prototype Fair—Facilitating Early Feedback in the Design Process
Abidi, S. Z., Lee, K., Trevas, D., & Woods, G. L. (2026) · Biomedical Engineering Education · doi:10.1007/s43683-026-00224-x
Peer Feedback on Learning Writing Skill for Senior University Students
Trịnh, T. V. T., & LOAN, N. T. (2026) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-1732-8.ch008
Wei, S., & Wei, W. (2026) · Nursing Reports · doi:10.3390/nursrep16060182
Analyzing Student Self-and-Peer Feedback to Improve and Enhance Teamwork
Huang, W., Wynkoop, R., Exter, M., & Berry, F. (2026) · TechTrends · doi:10.1007/s11528-026-01204-2
AI feedback vs. peer feedback in EFL writing: exploring Indonesian students’ perceptions
Dewi, U., Daulay, S. H., & Ismahani, S. (2026) · Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education · doi:10.1186/s40862-026-00424-6 · Cited by 2
Yang, J., & Schunn, C. D. (2026) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-026-09813-3
Self-citationBabik, D., & Babik, I. (2022) · Journal of Information Systems Education · doi:10.62273/gakm7538
Accept, elaborate, modify, or no uptake?: Which peer feedback features matter?
Gao, X., Schunn, C. D., Gulikers, J. T. M., Banihashem, S. K., Biemans, H. J. A., & Noroozi, O. (2026) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2026.102491
Self-citationFang, Y., Tan, Y., Zuo, C., & Boubaker, A. (2026) · International Conference on Computer Science and Technologies in Education (CSTE) · doi:10.1109/cste69562.2026.11649771
Enhancing Learning Through Peer Feedback at the Program Level
Roger, M., Copeman, E., Sandelson, T., Parker, R., Fawcett, T., & Reimann, N. (2026) · Teaching & Learning Inquiry The ISSOTL Journal · doi:10.20343/teachlearninqu.14.45
Metadata
- Authors
- Patchan, M. M., & Schunn, C. D.
- Affiliations
- University of Pittsburgh (US)
- Corresponding author
- Patchan, Melissa M.
- Venue
- Instructional Science
- Published
- 2015-05-30
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 591-614
- ISSN
- 0020-4277 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-1952
- OpenAlex
- W918950316
- Cited by
- 181
- References
- 51
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2
- FWCI
- 41.02
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Instructional Science (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Social Sciences › Education › Evaluation of Teaching Practices
- Keywords
- peer feedback, peer assessment, peer review, text quality, writing revision, feedback content, praise and criticism, writing instruction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review