Supporting argumentative essay writing through an online supported peer-review script

Peer Assessment between Students in Colleges and Universities

Topping, K. (1998) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.2307/1170598 · Cited by 2,173 · see citing works

The Skills of Argument

Kuhn, D. (1991) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511571350 · Cited by 2,094 · see citing works

Peer feedback: the learning element of peer assessment

Liu, N.-F., & Carless, D. (2006) · Teaching in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/13562510600680582 · Cited by 1,034 · see citing works

Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning

Walton, D. (2013) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203811160 · Cited by 998 · see citing works

Arguing and Thinking: a rhetorical approach to social psychology

Marraffa, M. (1995) · Iris (Roma Tre University) · Cited by 720 · see citing works

The place of argumentation in the pedagogy of school science

Newton, P. E., Driver, R., & Osborne, J. (1999) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/095006999290570 · Cited by 621 · see citing works

Improving the effectiveness of peer feedback for learning

Gielen, S., Peeters, E., Dochy, F., Onghena, P., & Struyven, K. (2010) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.007 · Cited by 615 · cited 1× · see citing works

THE PLACE OF ARGUMENTATION IN THE PEDAGOGY OF SCHOOL SCIENCE

(2003) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203464090-11 · Cited by 522 · see citing works

Who Reasons Well? Two Studies of Informal Reasoning Among Children of Different Grade, Ability, and Knowledge Levels

Means, M. L., & Voss, J. F. (1996) · Cognition and Instruction · doi:10.1207/s1532690xci1402_1 · Cited by 497 · see citing works

A conceptual framework for scaffolding III-structured problem-solving processes using question prompts and peer interactions

Ge, X., & Land, S. M. (2004) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/bf02504836 · Cited by 429 · see citing works

Thinking as Argument

Kuhn, D. (1992) · Harvard Educational Review · doi:10.17763/haer.62.2.9r424r0113t670l1 · Cited by 417 · see citing works

Training students to become successful peer reviewers

Min, H. (2005) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2004.11.003 · Cited by 412 · see citing works

‘Argument!’ helping students understand what essay writing is about

Wingate, U. (2011) · Journal of English for Academic Purposes · doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2011.11.001 · Cited by 392 · see citing works

Argumentation-Based Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (ABCSCL): A synthesis of 15 years of research

Noroozi, O., Weinberger, A., Biemans, H. J. A., Mulder, M., & Chizari, M. (2012) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2011.11.006 · Cited by 310 · see citing works

Arguing to learn and learning to argue: design justifications and guidelines

Jonassen, D. H., & Kim, B. (2009) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-009-9143-8 · Cited by 283 · see citing works

Foundations of Argumentative Text Processing

Coirier, P., & Andriessen, J. E. B. (2000) · Amsterdam University Press eBooks · doi:10.5117/9789053563403 · Cited by 260 · see citing works

Talking About Reasoning: How Important Is the Peer in Peer Collaboration?

Teasley, S. D. (1997) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-03362-3_16 · Cited by 235 · see citing works

Internal and external scripts in computer-supported collaborative inquiry learning

Kollar, I., Fischer, F., & Slotta, J. D. (2007) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.09.021 · Cited by 227 · see citing works

Facilitating argumentative knowledge construction through a transactive discussion script in CSCL

Noroozi, O., Weinberger, A., Biemans, H. J. A., Mulder, M., & Chizari, M. (2012) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.08.013 · Cited by 192 · see citing works

Understanding the benefits of providing peer feedback: how students respond to peers’ texts of varying quality

Patchan, M. M., & Schunn, C. D. (2015) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-015-9353-x · Cited by 181 · see citing works

Peer versus expert feedback: An investigation of the quality of peer feedback among secondary school students

Hovardas, T., Tsivitanidou, O. E., & Zacharia, Z. C. (2014) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2013.09.019 · Cited by 176 · cited 2× · see citing works

Relations between scripted online peer feedback processes and quality of written argumentative essay

Noroozi, O., Biemans, H., & Mulder, M. (2016) · The Internet and Higher Education · doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.05.002 · Cited by 176 · see citing works

Promoting Argumentation Competence: Extending from First- to Second-Order Scaffolding Through Adaptive Fading

Noroozi, O., Kirschner, P. A., Biemans, H. J. A., & Mulder, M. (2017) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-017-9400-z · Cited by 171 · see citing works

A Genre Description of the Argumentative Essay

Hyland, K. (1990) · RELC Journal · doi:10.1177/003368829002100105 · Cited by 170 · see citing works

Peer review as a strategy for improving students’ writing process

Baker, K. M. (2016) · Active Learning in Higher Education · doi:10.1177/1469787416654794 · Cited by 160 · see citing works

A systematic review on the impacts of game-based learning on argumentation skills

Noroozi, O., Dehghanzadeh, H., & Talaee, E. (2020) · Entertainment Computing · doi:10.1016/j.entcom.2020.100369 · Cited by 155 · see citing works

How does online peer feedback improve argumentative essay writing and learning?

Latifi, S., Noroozi, O., Hatami, J., & Biemans, H. J. A. (2019) · Innovations in Education and Teaching International · doi:10.1080/14703297.2019.1687005 · Cited by 148 · see citing works

Effects of Training for Peer Response on Students' Comments and Interaction

Zhu, W.-N. (1995) · Written Communication · doi:10.1177/0741088395012004004 · Cited by 141 · see citing works

Teaching genetics at secondary school: A strategy for teaching about the location of inheritance information

Banet, E., & Fernández, G. E. A. (2000) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/(sici)1098-237x(200005)84:3 · Cited by 141 · see citing works

Teaching the academic argument in a university EFL environment

Bacha, N. N. (2010) · Journal of English for Academic Purposes · doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2010.05.001 · Cited by 127 · see citing works

Students’ reflection on online self-correction and peer review to improve writing

Yang, Y. (2010) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.05.017 · Cited by 119 · see citing works

Perspectives on Argument

Wood, N. V. (1995) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 109 · see citing works

Students’ online argumentative peer feedback, essay writing, and content learning: does gender matter?

Noroozi, O., Hatami, J., Bayat, A., van Ginkel, S., Biemans, H. J. A., & Mulder, M. (2020) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2018.1543200 · Cited by 107 · see citing works

Worked example or scripting? Fostering students’ online argumentative peer feedback, essay writing and learning

Latifi, S., Noroozi, O., & Talaee, E. (2023) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2020.1799032 · Cited by 107 · see citing works

The effects of online peer feedback and epistemic beliefs on students’ argumentation-based learning

Noroozi, O., & Hatami, J. (2019) · Innovations in Education and Teaching International · doi:10.1080/14703297.2018.1431143 · Cited by 96 · see citing works

Affective Learning Together: Social and emotional dimensions of collaborative learning

Baker, M. J., Andriessen, J. E. B., & Järvelä, S. (2013) · HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe) · Cited by 93 · see citing works

Creating a Contrastive Rhetorical Stance

Mei, W. S. (2006) · RELC Journal · doi:10.1177/0033688206071316 · Cited by 92 · see citing works

Prompting secondary students’ use of criteria, feedback specificity and feedback levels during an investigative task

Gan, M. J. S., & Hattie, J. (2014) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-014-9319-4 · Cited by 87 · see citing works

Evaluating and Selecting Counterarguments

Leitão, S. (2003) · Written Communication · doi:10.1177/0741088303257507 · Cited by 84 · see citing works

Structuring the peer assessment process: a multilevel approach for the impact on product improvement and peer feedback quality

Gielen, M., & Wever, B. D. (2015) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.12096 · Cited by 78 · see citing works

Design and evaluation of a digital module with guided peer feedback for student learning biotechnology and molecular life sciences, attitudinal change, and satisfaction

Noroozi, O., & Mulder, M. (2017) · Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education · doi:10.1002/bmb.20981 · Cited by 71 · see citing works

The use of objective structured self-assessment and peer-feedback (OSSP) for learning communication skills: evaluation using a controlled trial

Perera, J. A., Mohamadou, G., & Kaur, S. (2009) · Advances in Health Sciences Education · doi:10.1007/s10459-009-9191-1 · Cited by 68 · see citing works

CSCL, Argumentation, and Deweyan Inquiry

Koschmann, T. D. (2003) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-017-0781-7_10 · Cited by 55 · see citing works

Strukturierte Kooperation beim computerunterstützten kollaborativen Lernen

Hron, A., Hesse, F. W., Reinhard, P., & Picard, E. (1997) · Pedocs (German Institute for International Educational Research) · doi:10.25656/01:7872 · Cited by 42 · see citing works

Rethinking the Argumentative Essay

Schneer, D. (2013) · TESOL Journal · doi:10.1002/tesj.123 · Cited by 42 · see citing works

Peer Assessment in a Wiki: Product Improvement, Students’ Learning And Perception Regarding Peer Feedback

Gielen, M., & Wever, B. D. (2012) · Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.450 · Cited by 39 · see citing works

Effects of a formative assessment script on how vocational students generate formative feedback to a peer’s or their own performance

Peters, O., Körndle, H., & Narciss, S. (2018) · European Journal of Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s10212-017-0344-y · Cited by 37 · see citing works

Group Emotions in Collective Reasoning: A Model

Polo, C., Plantin, C., Lund, K., & Niccolai, G. P. (2016) · Argumentation · doi:10.1007/s10503-016-9407-5 · Cited by 25 · see citing works

Engaging secondary school students with peer feedback in L2 writing classrooms: A mixed-methods study

Cheng, X., & Zhang, L. J. (2024) · Studies in Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101337 · Cited by 62 · see citing works

Students' argumentation performance in online learning environments: Bridging culture and gender

Ranjbaran, F., Babaee, M., Parvaneh Akhteh Khaneh, M., Gohari, M., Daneshvar Ghorbani, B., Taghizadeh Kerman, N., Banihashem, S. K., & Noroozi, O. (2023) · International Journal of Technology in Education · doi:10.46328/ijte.460 · Cited by 8 · see citing works

Evaluating the impact of using ChatGPT on EFL students’ argumentative skills

Mai, H. T. (2026) · Discover Education · doi:10.1007/s44217-026-01153-1 · Cited by 2 · see citing works

ACTA A Tool for Argumentative Clinical Trial Analysis

Mayer, T., Cabrio, E., & Villata, S. (2019) · International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.24963/ijcai.2019/953 · Cited by 11 · see citing works

A Study of Claims and Qualifiers in ESL Students’ Argumentative Writing --An empirical study based on Toulmin modelPreprint

Yang, R. (2021) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-764344/v1

Characterizing Argumentative Style: The Case of KLM and the Destructed Squirrels

van Eemeren, F. H. (2021) · Argumentation library · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-52907-9_2 · Cited by 2 · see citing works

Frans H. van Eemeren (Ed., 2017). Prototypical argumentative patterns: Exploring the relationship between argumentative discourse and institutional context

Rubinelli, S. (2018) · Journal of Argumentation in Context · doi:10.1075/jaic.00003.rub · Cited by 1 · see citing works

A Pedagogical Framework for Teaching Chinese College English Learners’ Argumentative Writing via Infusion of Critical Thinking

Lu, C., & Swatevacharkul, R. (2020) · World Journal of English Language · doi:10.5430/wjel.v11n1p1 · Cited by 4 · see citing works