The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Understanding the benefits of providing peer feedback: how students respond to peers’ texts of varying quality
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The act of providing peer feedback also requires students to actively (re)consider the assignment criteria, which may improve their own subsequent writing performance (Flower et al. 1986; Patchan and Schunn 2015).”
From The impact of formative peer feedback on higher education students' academic writing: a Meta-Analysis (2019) · cites this paper as Patchan and Schunn 2015
In the citing paper
“With respect to peer-feedback processes, it may help students formulate high-quality feedback messages or deeply elaborate on the feedback they receive from their peers (Lui & Andrade, 2022;Patchan & Schunn, 2015).”
From Enhancing the Peer-Feedback Process Through Instructional Support: A Meta-Analysis (2025) · cites this paper as Patchan & Schunn, 2015
In the citing paper
“With respect to peer-feedback processes, it may help students formulate high-quality feedback messages or deeply elaborate on the feedback they receive from their peers (Lui & Andrade, 2022;Patchan & Schunn, 2015).”
From Enhancing the Peer-Feedback Process Through Instructional Support: A Meta-Analysis (2025) · cites this paper as Patchan & Schunn, 2015
Citations
Cites
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
Muller, K. E., & Cohen, J. (1989) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1270020 · Cited by 99,603
Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
Cohen, J. (1990) · Computers Environment and Urban Systems · doi:10.1016/0198-9715(90)90050-4 · Cited by 65,417
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.).
Lachenbruch, P. A., & Cohen, J. (1989) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2290095 · Cited by 37,421
Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.254 · Cited by 5,882
(1991) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.28-5376 · Cited by 4,218
Toward an instance theory of automatization.
Logan, G. D. (1988) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.95.4.492 · Cited by 3,466
An Integrated Theory of the Mind.
Anderson, J. R., Bothell, D., Byrne, M. D., Douglass, S., Lebiere, C. J., & Qin, Y. (2004) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.111.4.1036 · Cited by 3,153
Cognitive Skills and Their Acquisition
Anderson, J. R. (2013) · Psychology Press eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203728178 · Cited by 2,929
The Atomic Components of Thought
Anderson, J. R., & Lebiere, C. J. (2014) · Psychology Press eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315805696 · Cited by 2,181
Self‐Explanations: How Students Study and Use Examples in Learning to Solve Problems
Chi, M. T. H., Bassok, M., Lewis, M. W., Reimann, P., & Glaser, R. (1989) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1207/s15516709cog1302_1 · Cited by 1,714
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Patchan, M. M., Schunn, C. D., & Correnti, R. J. (under review). The nature of feedback—revisited: How feedback features affect students’ willingness and ability to revise.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Huisman, B., Saab, N., van Driel, J., & van den Broek, P. (2018) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2018.1424318 · Cited by 318
Huisman, B., Saab, N., van den Broek, P., & van Driel, J. (2019) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2018.1545896 · Cited by 306
Guo, K., Pan, M., Li, Y., & Lai, C. (2024) · The Internet and Higher Education · doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2024.100962 · Cited by 173
Patchan, M. M., Schunn, C. D., & Correnti, R. J. (2016) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/edu0000103 · Cited by 165
Self-citationLatifi, S., Noroozi, O., & Talaee, E. (2021) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.13054 · Cited by 163
Bauer, E., Greisel, M., Kuznetsov, I., Berndt, M., Kollar, I., Dresel, M., Fischer, M. R., & Fischer, F. (2023) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.13336 · Cited by 130
Incorporating AI and learning analytics to build trustworthy peer assessment systems
Darvishi, A., Khosravi, H., Sadiq, S., & Gašević, D. (2022) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.13233 · Cited by 120
Huang, C., Tu, Y., Han, Z., Jiang, F., Wu, F. Q., & Jiang, Y. (2023) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104910 · Cited by 105
Alqassab, M., Strijbos, J.-W., & Ufer, S. (2018) · European Journal of Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s10212-017-0342-0 · Cited by 92
Making internal feedback explicit: exploiting the multiple comparisons that occur during peer review
Nicol, D., & McCallum, S. (2021) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2021.1924620 · Cited by 107
Noroozi, O., Banihashem, S. K., Biemans, H. J. A., Smits, M., Vervoort, M. T. W., & Verbaan, C.-L. (2023) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-023-11683-y · Cited by 83
Wu, Y., & Schunn, C. D. (2023) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2023.102160 · Cited by 78
Self-citationCao, Z., Yu, S., & Huang, J. (2019) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2019.08.001 · Cited by 83
Yu, S.-L. (2019) · Assessing Writing: An International Journal · doi:10.1016/j.asw.2019.03.004 · Cited by 71
Gao, Y., Schunn, C. D. D., & Yu, Q. (2019) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2018.1499075 · Cited by 71
Self-citationChang, D., Hwang, G., Chang, S., & Wang, S. (2021) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-021-10062-z · Cited by 78
EFL student engagement with giving peer feedback in academic writing: A longitudinal study
Zhang, F., Schunn, C., Chen, S., Li, W., & Li, R. (2023) · Journal of English for Academic Purposes · doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2023.101255 · Cited by 63
Self-citationKrause, M., Garncarz, T., Song, J., Gerber, E. M., Bailey, B. P., & Dow, S. P. (2017) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3025453.3025883 · Cited by 60
Chiang, C., Kasunic, A., & Savage, S. (2018) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3274306 · Cited by 59
The End is the Beginning is the End: The closed-loop learning analytics framework
Sailer, M., Ninaus, M., Huber, S. E., Bauer, E., & Greiff, S. (2024) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2024.108305 · Cited by 79
Learning to improve the quality peer feedback through experience with peer feedback
Zong, Z., Schunn, C. D., & Wang, Y. (2020) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2020.1833179 · Cited by 56
Self-citationSupporting argumentative essay writing through an online supported peer-review script
Latifi, S., & Noroozi, O. (2021) · Innovations in Education and Teaching International · doi:10.1080/14703297.2021.1961097 · Cited by 46
Dmoshinskaia, N., Gijlers, H., & de Jong, T. (2021) · Learning Environments Research · doi:10.1007/s10984-021-09389-4 · Cited by 44
Understanding the what and when of peer feedback benefits for performance and transfer
Yu, Q., & Schunn, C. D. (2023) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2023.107857 · Cited by 50
Self-citationHuisman, B., Admiraal, W., Pilli, O., van de Ven, M., & Saab, N. (2018) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.12520 · Cited by 42
Alemdağ, E., & Yıldırım, Z. (2022) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104574 · Cited by 51
Using Google Docs for Peer-then-Teacher Review on Middle School Students’ Writing
Neumann, K. L., & Kopcha, T. J. (2019) · Computers & composition/Computers and composition · doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2019.102524 · Cited by 46
Changes in the reliability and validity of peer assessment across the college years
Zhang, F., Schunn, C. D., Li, W.-T., & Long, M. (2020) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2020.1724260 · Cited by 39
Self-citationLipowsky, F. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-61403-7_4 · Cited by 63
College student perceptions of writing errors, text quality, and author characteristics
Johnson, A. C., Wilson, J., & Roscoe, R. D. (2017) · Assessing Writing · doi:10.1016/j.asw.2017.10.002 · Cited by 48
Supporting the development of collaboration and feedback skills in instructional designers
Lowell, V. L., & Ashby, I. V. (2018) · Journal of Computing in Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s12528-018-9170-8 · Cited by 40
Incidencia de la revisión por pares en la construcción de textos académicos a nivel universitario
Pereira, M. M. B. (2021) · DELTA Documentação de Estudos em Lingüística Teórica e Aplicada · doi:10.1590/1678-460x202153017 · Cited by 40
Peters, O., Körndle, H., & Narciss, S. (2018) · European Journal of Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s10212-017-0344-y · Cited by 37
Benefits of Peer Review on Students’ Writing
Yalch, M. M., Vitale, E. M., & Ford, J. K. (2019) · Psychology Learning & Teaching · doi:10.1177/1475725719835070 · Cited by 40
Providing Formative Peer Feedback
Panadero, E., Jönsson, A., & Alqassab, M. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316832134.020 · Cited by 41
Finkenstaedt-Quinn, S. A., Polakowski, N. L., Gunderson, B., Shultz, G. V., & Gere, A. R. (2021) · Written Communication · doi:10.1177/07410883211006038 · Cited by 46
Lu, Q., Zhu, X., & Cheong, C. M. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.739962 · Cited by 40
Variability in students' evaluating processes in peer assessment with calibrated peer review
Russell, J. M., Horne, S. V., Ward, A. S., Bettis, E. A., & Gikonyo, J. (2017) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.12176 · Cited by 33
Huisman, B., Saab, N., DRIEL, J. H. V., & van den Broek, P. (2017) · Higher Education Research & Development · doi:10.1080/07294360.2017.1325854 · Cited by 33
Alqassab, M., Strijbos, J.-W., & Ufer, S. (2018) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2018.1485012 · Cited by 33
Su, W., & Huang, A. (2021) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2021.2004389 · Cited by 36
Incorporating Training, Self-monitoring and AI-Assistance to Improve Peer Feedback Quality
Darvishi, A., Khosravi, H., Abdi, S., Sadiq, S., & Gašević, D. (2022) · Proceedings of the Ninth ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale · doi:10.1145/3491140.3528265 · Cited by 31
Explicating peer feedback quality and its impact on feedback implementation in EFL writing
He, W., & Gao, Y. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1177094 · Cited by 29
Epp, C. D., Akçayır, G., & Phirangee, K. (2019) · Reflective Practice · doi:10.1080/14623943.2019.1642189 · Cited by 30
Alqassab, M., Strijbos, J.-W., & Ufer, S. (2018) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.07.003 · Cited by 27
Wang, X.-M., Yu, X.-H., Hwang, G., & Hu, Q.-N. (2023) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-023-10257-6 · Cited by 40
Dmoshinskaia, N., Gijlers, H., & de Jong, T. (2020) · Journal of Science Education and Technology · doi:10.1007/s10956-020-09884-y · Cited by 28
Kasch, J., van Rosmalen, P., Henderikx, M., & Kalz, M. (2021) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2021.1893650 · Cited by 27
Chen, Y., Li, M., Cukurova, M., & Jong, M. S. (2023) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.13376 · Cited by 26
Automated Writing Instruction and Feedback: Instructional Mode, Attitudes, and Revising
Roscoe, R. D., Allen, L. K., Johnson, A. C., & McNamara, D. S. (2018) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/1541931218621471 · Cited by 28
What does it take to provide effective peer feedback?
Little, T., Dawson, P., Boud, D. J., & Tai, J. (2025) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2025.2475059 · Cited by 28
Brkić, L., Mekterović, I., Fertalj, M., & Mekterović, D. (2024) · Comput. Educ. · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105001 · Cited by 22
Tran, T. Y., & Ma, Q. (2024) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101418 · Cited by 37
Gao, Y., An, Q., & Schunn, C. D. (2023) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2023.101252 · Cited by 23
Self-citationDingyloudi, F., & Strijbos, J.-W. (2018) · Learning Culture and Social Interaction · doi:10.1016/j.lcsi.2018.02.002 · Cited by 20
Enhancing the Peer-Feedback Process Through Instructional Support: A Meta-Analysis
Hornstein, J., Keller, M. V., Greisel, M., Dresel, M., & Kollar, I. (2025) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-025-10017-3 · Cited by 18
“…peer-feedback may improve different kinds of peer-feedback processes and outcomes: With respect to peer-feedback processes, it may help students formulate high-quality feedback messages or deeply elaborate on the feedback they receive from their peers (Lui & Andrade, 2022; Patchan & Schunn, 2015).”
Noroozi, O., & Wever, B. D. (2023) · Social interaction in learning and development · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-29411-2 · Cited by 23
Dmoshinskaia, N., Gijlers, H., & de Jong, T. (2020) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100959 · Cited by 19
Zong, Z., Schunn, C. D., & Wang, Y. (2021) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2021.107056 · Cited by 18
Self-citationPeer review in academic writing: Different perspectives from instructors and students
Ahmed, R. A. (2020) · TESOL Journal · doi:10.1002/tesj.537 · Cited by 17
Pre-service music teacher perceptions of peer feedback
Legette, R. M., & Royo, J. L. (2019) · Research Studies in Music Education · doi:10.1177/1321103x19862298 · Cited by 18
Alemdağ, E., & Yıldırım, Z. (2022) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-022-10115-x · Cited by 20
Rehman, N., Huang, X., Mahmood, A., Maqbool, S., & Javed, S. (2024) · New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development · doi:10.1155/2024/1271802 · Cited by 16
Aben, J. E. J., Dingyloudi, F., Timmermans, A. C., & Strijbos, J.-W. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-25112-3_7 · Cited by 15
Students’ perceptions of online peer feedback in process-oriented L2 writing: A qualitative inquiry
İrgin, P., & Bilki, Z. (2024) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101403 · Cited by 20
Shulgina, G., Costley, J., Щеглова, И. А., Zhang, H., & Sedova, N. S. (2024) · Smart Learning Environments · doi:10.1186/s40561-024-00315-8 · Cited by 18
Reviewer, essay, and reviewing-process characteristics that predict errors in web-based peer review
Xiong, Y., & Schunn, C. D. (2021) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104146 · Cited by 13
Self-citationAstrid, A., Rukmini, D., Fitriati, S. W., & Syafryadin, S. (2021) · Journal of language and Education · doi:10.17323/jle.2021.10585 · Cited by 12
Al-Obaydi, L. H., & Pikhart, M. (2025) · Language Testing in Asia · doi:10.1186/s40468-025-00375-8 · Cited by 18
Berg, S. A., & Moon, A. C. (2021) · Chemistry Education Research and Practice · doi:10.1039/d1rp00213a · Cited by 13
Bibliometric Analysis of Research on Peer Feedback in Teaching and Learning
Lam, C. N. C., & Habil, H. (2021) · Pertanika journal of social science & humanities · doi:10.47836/pjssh.29.3.25 · Cited by 13
The Use of Peer Assessment to Improve Students’ Learning of Geometry
Omar, S. N. P., Shahrıll, M., & Sajali, M. Z. (2018) · European Journal of Social Sciences Education and Research · doi:10.26417/ejser.v5i2.p203-222 · Cited by 24
Ge, Z.-G. (2019) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2019.1643743 · Cited by 11
Wu, H., Zhu, H., & Yang, X. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1059555 · Cited by 13
Finkenstaedt-Quinn, S. A., Watts, F. M., & Shultz, G. V. (2024) · Assessing Writing · doi:10.1016/j.asw.2024.100808 · Cited by 11
Alemdağ, E., & Narciss, S. (2025) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-025-00522-4 · Cited by 17
Consistency in providing peer feedback: the role of individual and situational factors
Gao, X., Schunn, C. D., Noroozi, O., Gulikers, J. T. M., Banihashem, S. K., & Biemans, H. J. A. (2025) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2025.2517617 · Cited by 9
Self-citationGyamfi, G., Hanna, B. E., & Khosravi, H. (2024) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-024-10346-0 · Cited by 9
Shulgina, G., Fanguy, M., Zhang, H., Courtney, M. G. R., Baldwin, M., & Costley, J. (2024) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105104 · Cited by 8
Modeling Student Evaluations of Writing and Authors as a Function of Writing Errors
Roscoe, R. D., Wilson, J., Patchan, M. M., Chen, D., & Johnson, A. C. (2020) · Journal of language and Education · doi:10.17323/jle.2020.10316 · Cited by 10
Self-citationOpening Pandora’s Box: How Does Peer Assessment Affect EFL Students’ Writing Quality?
Meletiadou, E. (2021) · Languages · doi:10.3390/languages6030115 · Cited by 9
Police education and role play: Insights from the literature
Turner, A. H. (2021) · The Police Journal Theory Practice and Principles · doi:10.1177/0032258x211031516 · Cited by 8
Franke, U., Backfisch, I., Scherzinger, L., Tolou, A., Thyssen, C., Brahm, T., Rudolf, I., & Lachner, A. (2024) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-024-10403-8 · Cited by 14
Zong, Z., & Schunn, C. D. (2023) · International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning · doi:10.1007/s11412-023-09401-4 · Cited by 7
Self-citationChen, W., Lyu, Q., & Su, J. (2024) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-024-09667-7 · Cited by 7
Greisel, M., Hornstein, J., & Kollar, I. (2024) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101438 · Cited by 8
Dmoshinskaia, N., Gijlers, H., & de Jong, T. (2022) · Journal of Science Education and Technology · doi:10.1007/s10956-021-09939-8 · Cited by 7
Comparing motivational features between feedback givers and receivers in English speaking class
Su, W. (2022) · IRAL - International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching · doi:10.1515/iral-2021-0197 · Cited by 7
Do learners learn from corrective peer feedback? Insights from students
Jiang, X., & Ironsi, S. S. (2024) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101385 · Cited by 6
Jin, M., Jiang, Q., Xiong, W., Li, Q., Feng, Y., & Zhao, W. (2024) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101394 · Cited by 6
Influencia de la rúbrica en la calidad de la retroalimentación del desempeño docente en aula
Kenigs, O. A. A., Hernández, M. E. M., & Montanero, M. (2023) · Revista Electrónica de Investigación Educativa · doi:10.24320/redie.2023.25.e04.4326 · Cited by 16
A GEARed peer feedback model and implications for learning facilitation
Huang, S.-C. (2018) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2018.1439881 · Cited by 7
Students’ Perceptions on Online Peer Feedback Practice In EFL Writing
Putra, I. G. K. M., Santosa, M. H., & Pratiwi, N. P. A. (2021) · IJEE (Indonesian Journal of English Education) · doi:10.15408/ijee.v8i2.21488 · Cited by 6
Zhang, H., Costley, J., Courtney, M. G. R., Shulgina, G., & Fanguy, M. (2024) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-024-13032-z · Cited by 6
Lai, C., Pan, M., Guo, K., & Cui, Y. (2026) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2026.105675 · Cited by 11
Xie, X., Nimehchisalem, V., Yong, M. F., & Yap, N. T. (2024) · Arab World English Journal · doi:10.24093/awej/vol15no1.19 · Cited by 5
English Education Master Students' Perceptions on Peer Feedback in Academic Writing
Wijaya, K. F. (2022) · Journal of Foreign Languange Teaching and Learning · doi:10.18196/ftl.v7i1.12751 · Cited by 11
Testing an Evaluation Tool to Facilitate Police Officers’ Peer Review of Child Interviews
Danby, M. C., Sharman, S. J., & Guadagno, B. L. (2022) · Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology · doi:10.1007/s11896-022-09516-8 · Cited by 5
AssessChain: A hybrid blockchain-based system for transparent and reliable online assessment
Qingyi, Y., Liang-min, W., Pan, S., Yifan, Z., & Li, J. (2024) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-024-12713-z · Cited by 5
Pieters, J., Verstegen, D. M. L., Dolmans, D. H. J. M., Warmenhoven, F. C., & Everdingen, M. H. J. V. D. B.-V. (2021) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-021-02681-0 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Patchan, M. M., & Schunn, C. D.
- Affiliations
- University of Pittsburgh (US)
- Corresponding author
- Patchan, Melissa M.
- Venue
- Instructional Science
- Published
- 2015-05-30
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 591-614
- ISSN
- 0020-4277 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-1952
- OpenAlex
- W918950316
- Cited by
- 181
- References
- 51
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2
- FWCI
- 41.02
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Instructional Science (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Social Sciences › Education › Evaluation of Teaching Practices
- Keywords
- peer feedback, peer assessment, peer review, text quality, writing revision, feedback content, praise and criticism, writing instruction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review