The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Understanding the benefits of providing peer feedback: how students respond to peers’ texts of varying quality
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The act of providing peer feedback also requires students to actively (re)consider the assignment criteria, which may improve their own subsequent writing performance (Flower et al. 1986; Patchan and Schunn 2015).”
From The impact of formative peer feedback on higher education students' academic writing: a Meta-Analysis (2019) · cites this paper as Patchan and Schunn 2015
In the citing paper
“With respect to peer-feedback processes, it may help students formulate high-quality feedback messages or deeply elaborate on the feedback they receive from their peers (Lui & Andrade, 2022;Patchan & Schunn, 2015).”
From Enhancing the Peer-Feedback Process Through Instructional Support: A Meta-Analysis (2025) · cites this paper as Patchan & Schunn, 2015
In the citing paper
“With respect to peer-feedback processes, it may help students formulate high-quality feedback messages or deeply elaborate on the feedback they receive from their peers (Lui & Andrade, 2022;Patchan & Schunn, 2015).”
From Enhancing the Peer-Feedback Process Through Instructional Support: A Meta-Analysis (2025) · cites this paper as Patchan & Schunn, 2015
Citations
Cites
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
Muller, K. E., & Cohen, J. (1989) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1270020 · Cited by 99,603
Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
Cohen, J. (1990) · Computers Environment and Urban Systems · doi:10.1016/0198-9715(90)90050-4 · Cited by 65,417
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.).
Lachenbruch, P. A., & Cohen, J. (1989) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2290095 · Cited by 37,421
Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.254 · Cited by 5,882
(1991) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.28-5376 · Cited by 4,218
Toward an instance theory of automatization.
Logan, G. D. (1988) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.95.4.492 · Cited by 3,466
An Integrated Theory of the Mind.
Anderson, J. R., Bothell, D., Byrne, M. D., Douglass, S., Lebiere, C. J., & Qin, Y. (2004) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.111.4.1036 · Cited by 3,153
Cognitive Skills and Their Acquisition
Anderson, J. R. (2013) · Psychology Press eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203728178 · Cited by 2,929
The Atomic Components of Thought
Anderson, J. R., & Lebiere, C. J. (2014) · Psychology Press eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315805696 · Cited by 2,181
Self‐Explanations: How Students Study and Use Examples in Learning to Solve Problems
Chi, M. T. H., Bassok, M., Lewis, M. W., Reimann, P., & Glaser, R. (1989) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1207/s15516709cog1302_1 · Cited by 1,714
Topping, K. J. (2005) · Educational Psychology · doi:10.1080/01443410500345172 · Cited by 1,597
Mechanisms of skill acquisition and the law of practice
Newell, A., & Rosenbloom, P. S. (2018) · Figshare · doi:10.1184/r1/6607196 · Cited by 1,501
Mechanisms of skill acquisition and the law of practice
Newell, A., & Rosenbloom, P. S. (2018) · Figshare · doi:10.1184/r1/6607199.v1 · Cited by 1,365
The transfer of cognitive skill
(1990) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.27-2989 · Cited by 1,250
The influence of improvement in one mental function upon the efficiency of other functions. (I).
Woodworth, R. S., & Thorndike, E. L. (1901) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0074898 · Cited by 1,223
Student Peer Assessment in Higher Education: A Meta-Analysis Comparing Peer and Teacher Marks
Falchikov, N., & Goldfinch, J. (2000) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543070003287 · Cited by 1,170
A cognitive process theory of writing
Flower, L., & Hayes, J. R. (1981) · College Composition & Communication · doi:10.58680/ccc198115885 · Cited by 1,025
To give is better than to receive: The benefits of peer review to the reviewer's own writing
Lundstrom, K., & Baker, W. (2009) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2008.06.002 · Cited by 843
Vinkhuyzen, R. E., Verschure, P. F. M. J., & Newell, A. (1994) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1422886 · Cited by 831
The influence of teacher commentary on student revision
Ferris, D. R. (1997) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3588049 · Cited by 618 · cited 1×
“Receiving specific comments has been found to be more effective than receiving less specific comments (Ferris 1997).”
BackgroundThe nature of feedback: How different types of peer feedback affect writing performance
Nelson, M. M., & Schunn, C. D. (2009) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-008-9053-x · Cited by 602
Self-citationScaffolded writing and rewriting in the discipline: A web-based reciprocal peer review system
Cho, K., & Schunn, C. D. (2005) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2005.02.004 · Cited by 548
Self-citationDetection, Diagnosis, and the Strategies of Revision
Flower, L., Hayes, J. R., Carey, L., Schriver, K., & Stratman, J. (1986) · College Composition & Communication · doi:10.2307/357381 · Cited by 450
Assessor or assessee: How student learning improves by giving and receiving peer feedback
Li, L., Liu, X., & Steckelberg, A. L. (2009) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.00968.x · Cited by 410
Students’ perceptions about peer assessment for writing: their origin and impact on revision work
Kaufman, J. H., & Schunn, C. D. (2010) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-010-9133-6 · Cited by 335
Self-citationPeer reviewers learn from giving comments
Cho, Y. H., & Cho, K. (2011) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-010-9146-1 · Cited by 294
Online peer assessment: effects of cognitive and affective feedback
Lu, J., & Law, N. W. Y. (2011) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-011-9177-2 · Cited by 272
Cho, K., & MacArthur, C. (2011) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0021950 · Cited by 246
Advances in Applied Psycholinguistics
(1987) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511571374 · Cited by 225
Unravelling peer assessment: Methodological, functional, and conceptual developments
Strijbos, J.-W., & Sluijsmans, D. (2010) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.002 · Cited by 223
Patchan, M. M., Schunn, C. D., & Correnti, R. J. (2016) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/edu0000103 · Cited by 165
Self-citationRedefining Revision for Freshmen
Wallace, D. L., & Hayes, J. R. (2020) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315044620-37 · Cited by 83
Patchan, M. M., Charney, D., & Schunn, C. D. (2009) · Journal of Writing Research · doi:10.17239/jowr-2009.01.02.2 · Cited by 81
Self-citationLi, L., Liu, X., & Zhou, Y. (2011) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01180.x · Cited by 79
Learning to Write in a Genre: What Student Writers Take from Model Texts
Charney, D., & Carls, R. A. (1995) · Research in the Teaching of English · doi:10.58680/rte199515358 · Cited by 68
Redefining Revision for Freshmen
Wallace, D. L., & Hayes, J. R. (1991) · Research in the Teaching of English · doi:10.58680/rte199115475 · Cited by 58
Paradoxical effects of feedback in international online reciprocal peer tutoring
Topping, K. J., Dehkinet, R., Blanch, S., Corcelles, M., & Durán, D. (2012) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.002 · Cited by 56
The effects of skill diversity on commenting and revisions
Patchan, M. M., Hawk, B. N., Stevens, C. A., & Schunn, C. D. (2012) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-012-9236-3 · Cited by 55
Self-citationUnderstanding the Effectiveness of Online Peer Assessment: A Path Model
Lu, J.-Y., & Zhang, Z. (2012) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.2190/ec.46.3.f · Cited by 45
Understanding the benefits of receiving peer feedback: A case of matching ability in peer-review
Patchan, M. M., & Schunn, C. D. (2016) · Journal of Writing Research · doi:10.17239/jowr-2016.08.02.03 · Cited by 39
Self-citationReading, writing, and language learning
Rosenberg, S. D. (1987) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · Cited by 29
Roediger, H. L., III (2007) · APS observer · Cited by 10
Expanding Horizons: Research on Underrepresented Groups
Wang, S. (2007) · APS observer · Cited by 4
Inuzuka, M. (2005) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 2
Chi (1996) · doi:10.1002/(sici)1099-0720(199611)10:7
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Patchan, M. M., Schunn, C. D., & Correnti, R. J. (under review). The nature of feedback—revisited: How feedback features affect students’ willingness and ability to revise.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Huisman, B., Saab, N., van Driel, J., & van den Broek, P. (2018) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2018.1424318 · Cited by 318
Huisman, B., Saab, N., van den Broek, P., & van Driel, J. (2019) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2018.1545896 · Cited by 306
Guo, K., Pan, M., Li, Y., & Lai, C. (2024) · The Internet and Higher Education · doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2024.100962 · Cited by 173
Patchan, M. M., Schunn, C. D., & Correnti, R. J. (2016) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/edu0000103 · Cited by 165
Self-citationLatifi, S., Noroozi, O., & Talaee, E. (2021) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.13054 · Cited by 163
Metadata
- Authors
- Patchan, M. M., & Schunn, C. D.
- Affiliations
- University of Pittsburgh (US)
- Corresponding author
- Patchan, Melissa M.
- Venue
- Instructional Science
- Published
- 2015-05-30
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 591-614
- ISSN
- 0020-4277 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-1952
- OpenAlex
- W918950316
- Cited by
- 181
- References
- 51
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2
- FWCI
- 41.02
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Instructional Science (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Social Sciences › Education › Evaluation of Teaching Practices
- Keywords
- peer feedback, peer assessment, peer review, text quality, writing revision, feedback content, praise and criticism, writing instruction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
