Cited by 363Video Surveillance and Tracking MethodsAutonomous Vehicle Technology and SafetyVisual Attention and Saliency Detection

LaSOT: A High-quality Large-scale Single Object Tracking Benchmark

Open access
Fan, Heng, Bai, Hexin, Lin, Liting, Yang, Fan, Chu, Peng, Deng, Ge, Yu, Sijia, Harshit +6 more·2021·International Journal of Computer Vision

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11263-020-01387-y

Cites

92 of 92 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • LaSO-Text is an extension of LaSOT, featuring a subset of 15 categories with 150 videos.

    “LaSO-Text [23] is an extension of LaSOT, featuring a subset of 15 categories with 150 videos.”

    From SAM2LONG: Enhancing SAM 2 for Long Video Segmentation with a Training-Free Memory Tree (2025) · cites this paper as [23]

    Section 3.2 (Data Collection) says that LaSOT has a part comprising 150 sequences from 15 object classes. Our copy does not identify that part as LaSO-Text or describe LaSO-Text as an extension of LaSOT, so it supports the figures but not their attribution to the named extension. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 95 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [76]Valmadre, J., Bertinetto, L., Henriques, J., Vedaldi, A., Torr, P.H.: End-to-end representation learning for corre- lation filter based tracking. In: CVPR (2017)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fan, H., Bai, H., Lin, L., Yang, F., Chu, P., Deng, G., Yu, S., Harshit, Huang, M., Liu, J., Xu, Y., Liao, C., Yuan, L., & Ling, H.
Affiliations
  • Stony Brook University (US)
  • Temple University (US)
  • Peng Cheng Laboratory (CN)
  • Amazon (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Fan, Heng
Venue
International Journal of Computer Vision
Published
2020-09-29
Volume
129
Issue
2
Pages
439-461
ISSN
  • 0920-5691 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-1405
OpenAlex
W3090155371
Cited by
360
References
95
Citations by year
2026: 91 · 2025: 116 · 2024: 77 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 1
FWCI
7.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Computer Vision (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Video Surveillance and Tracking Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
Keywords
single object tracking, tracking benchmark, LaSOT, long-term tracking, target occlusion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review