Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 419

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Comparison between a chimeric lysin ClyH and other enzymes for extracting DNA to detect methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus by quantitative PCR

Hu, Yuanyuan, Yang, Hang, Wang, Jing, Zhang, Yun, Yu, Junping, Wei, Hongping·2016·World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology
DOI 10.1007/s11274-015-1971-6
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11274-015-1971-6

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 35

  1. Ablain W, Soulier SH, Causeur D, Gautier M, Baron F (2009) A simple and rapid method for the disruption of Staphylococcus aureus, optimized for quantitative reverse transcriptase applications: application for the examination of Camembert cheese dairy. Sci Technol 89:69–81. doi: 10.1051/dst/2008034 · doi:10.1051/dst/2008034
  2. Aldous WK, Pounder JI, Cloud JL, Woods GL (2005) Comparison of six methods of extracting Mycobacterium tuberculosis DNA from processed sputum for testing by quantitative real-time PCR. J Clin Microbiol 43:2471–2473. doi: 10.1128/jcm.43.5.2471-2473.2005 · doi:10.1128/jcm.43.5.2471-2473.2005
  3. Bera A, Biswas R, Herbert S, Kulauzovic E, Weidenmaier C, Peschel A, Gotz F (2007) Influence of wall teichoic acid on lysozyme resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. J Bacteriol 189:280–283. doi: 10.1128/jb.01221-06 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Blot S, Vandewoude K, Colardyn F (1998) Staphylococcus aureus infections. N Engl J Med 339:2025–2026 · doi:10.1056/nejm199812313392716
  5. Botaro BG, Cortinhas CS, Marco LV, Moreno JFG, Silva LFP, Benites NR, Santos MV (2013) Detection and enumeration of Staphylococcus aureus from bovine milk samples by real-time polymerase chain reaction. J Dairy Sci 96:6955–6964. doi: 10.3168/jds.2013-6559 · DOI
  6. CLSI (2009) Analysis and presentation of cumulative antimicrobial susceptibility test data; approved guideline, third edition. CLSI document M39-A3. Clinical Laboratory and Standards Institute, Wayne
  7. Coffey B, Mills S, Coffey A, McAuliffe O, Ross RP (2010) Phage and their lysins as biocontrol agents for food safety applications. Annu Rev Food Sci Technol 1:449–468. doi: 10.1146/annurev.food.102308.124046 · DOI
  8. Courchesne NM, Parisien A, Lan CQ (2009) Production and application of bacteriophage and bacteriophage-encoded lysins. Recent Pat Biotechnol 3:37–45 · DOI
  9. Fenton M, Ross P, McAuliffe O, O’Mahony J, Coffey A (2010) Recombinant bacteriophage lysins as antibacterials. Bioeng Bugs 1:9–16. doi: 10.4161/bbug.1.1.9818 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Fischetti VA (2010) Bacteriophage endolysins: a novel anti-infective to control Gram-positive pathogens. Int J Med Microbiol 300:357–362. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2010.04.002 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Grundling A, Schneewind O (2006) Cross-linked peptidoglycan mediates lysostaphin binding to the cell wall envelope of Staphylococcus aureus. J Bacteriol 188:2463–2472. doi: 10.1128/jb.188.7.2463-2472.2006 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Hohnadel M, Felden L, Fijuljanin D, Jouette S, Chollet R (2014) A new ultrasonic high-throughput instrument for rapid DNA release from microorganisms. J Microbiol Methods 99:71–80. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2014.02.004 · DOI
  13. Hwang KY et al (2012) Solid phase DNA extraction with a flexible bead-packed microfluidic device to detect methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in nasal swabs. Anal Chem 84:7912–7918. doi: 10.1021/ac3016533 · doi:10.1021/ac3016533
  14. Kim JU, Cha CH, An HK, Lee HJ, Kim MN (2013) Multiplex real-time PCR assay for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strains suitable in regions of high MRSA endemicity. J Clin Microbiol 51:1008–1013. doi: 10.1128/jcm.02495-12 · DOI
  15. Kocagoz T, Yilmaz E, Ozkara S, Kocagoz S, Hayran M, Sachedeva M, Chambers HF (1993) Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in sputum samples by polymerase chain-reaction using a simplified procedure. J Clin Microbiol 31:1435–1438 · DOI
  16. Liesack W, Weyland H, Stackebrandt E (1991) Potential risks of gene amplification by PCR as determined by 16S rDNA analysis of a mixed-culture of strict barophilic bacteria. Microb Ecol 21:191–198. doi: 10.1007/bf02539153 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Loeffler JM, Nelson D, Fischetti VA (2001) Rapid killing of Streptococcus pneumoniae with a bacteriophage cell wall hydrolase. Science 294:2170–2172. doi: 10.1126/science.1066869 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Loessner MJ (2005) Bacteriophage endolysins—current state of research and applications. Curr Opin Microbiol 8:480–487. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2005.06.002 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Ma K et al (2014) Rapid and simultaneous detection of Salmonella, Shigella, and Staphylococcus aureus in fresh pork using a multiplex real-time PCR assay based on immunomagnetic separation. Food Control 42:87–93. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2014.01.042 · doi:10.1016/j.foodcont.2014.01.042
  20. McCann CD, Jordan JA (2014) Evaluation of MolYsis (TM) Complete5 DNA extraction method for detecting Staphylococcus aureus DNA from whole blood in a sepsis model using PCR/pyrosequencing. J Microbiol Methods 99:1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2014.01.013 · DOI
  21. Meng X et al (2011) Application of a bacteriophage lysin to disrupt biofilms formed by the animal pathogen Streptococcus suis. Appl Environ Microbiol 77:8272–8279. doi: 10.1128/aem.05151-11 · DOI
  22. Middelberg AP (1995) Process-scale disruption of microorganisms. Biotechnol Adv 13:491–551 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Murray PR, Baron EJ (2003) Manual of clinical microbiology, 8th edn. American Society for Microbiology Press, Washington
  24. Nelson D, Loomis L, Fischetti VA (2001) Prevention and elimination of upper respiratory colonization of mice by group A streptococci by using a bacteriophage lytic enzyme. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:4107–4112. doi: 10.1073/pnas.061038398 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Niwa T, Kawamura Y, Katagiri Y, Ezaki T (2005) Lytic enzyme, labiase for a broad range of Gram-positive bacteria and its application to analyze functional DNA/RNA. J Microbiol Methods 61:251–260. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2004.12.006 · doi:10.1016/j.mimet.2004.12.006
  26. Oblath EA, Henley WH, Alarie JP, Ramsey JM (2013) A microfluidic chip integrating DNA extraction and real-time PCR for the detection of bacteria in saliva. Lab Chip 13:1325–1332. doi: 10.1039/c3lc40961a · DOI
  27. Rantakokko-Jalava K, Jalava J (2002) Optimal DNA isolation method for detection of bacteria in clinical specimens by broad-range PCR. J Clin Microbiol 40:4211–4217 · DOI
  28. Rashel M et al (2007) Efficient elimination of multidrug-resistant Staphylococcus aureus by cloned lysin derived from bacteriophage phi MR11. J Infect Dis 196:1237–1247. doi: 10.1086/521305 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Schuch R, Nelson D, Fischetti VA (2002) A bacteriolytic agent that detects and kills Bacillus anthracis. Nature 418:884–889. doi: 10.1038/nature01026 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Shan G, Jin W, Lam EK, Xing X (2008) Purification of total DNA extracted from activated sludge. J Environ Sci (China) 20:80–87 · doi:10.1016/s1001-0742(08)60012-1
  31. Shittu A, Nubel U, Udo E, Lin J, Gaogakwe S (2009) Characterization of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates from hospitals in KwaZulu-Natal province. Repub S Afr J Med Microbiol 58:1219–1226. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.011452-0 · DOI
  32. Tiemersma EW et al (2004) Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Europe, 1999–2002. Emerg Infect Dis 10:1627–1634 · DOI · Paper page
  33. von Wintzingerode F, Gobel UB, Stackebrandt E (1997) Determination of microbial diversity in environmental samples: pitfalls of PCR-based rRNA analysis. FEMS Microbiol Rev 21:213–229 · doi:10.1111/j.1574-6976.1997.tb00351.x · Paper page
  34. Wang HY, Kim S, Kim J, Park SD, Uh Y, Lee H (2014) Multiplex real-time PCR assay for rapid detection of methicillin-resistant staphylococci directly from positive blood cultures. J Clin Microbiol 52:1911–1920 · DOI
  35. Yang H, Zhang Y, Yu J, Huang Y, Zhang XE, Wei H (2014) Novel chimeric lysin with high-level antimicrobial activity against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in vitro and in vivo. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 58:536–542. doi: 10.1128/aac.01793-13 · DOI

Cited by

See all 419

Metadata

Authors
Hu, Y., Yang, H., Wang, J., Zhang, Y., Yu, J., & Wei, H.
Venue
World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2015-11-23
Volume
32
Issue
1
Pages
1-1
ISSN
  • 0959-3993 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-0972
DOI
10.1007/s11274-015-1971-6
OpenAlex
W2190353554
Cited by
419
References
2
FWCI
41.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison between a chimeric lysin ClyH and other enzymes for extracting DNA to detect methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus by quantitative PCR. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s11274-015-1971-6
The paper
Hu, Y., Yang, H., Wang, J., Zhang, Y., Yu, J., & Wei, H. (2016). Comparison between a chimeric lysin ClyH and other enzymes for extracting DNA to detect methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus by quantitative PCR. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-015-1971-6

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.