CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 244Policing Practices and PerceptionsHuman Resource Development and Performance EvaluationCriminal Justice and Penology

Training police for procedural justice

Skogan, Wesley G., Van Craen, Maarten, Hennessy, Cari·2015·Journal of Experimental Criminology
DOI 10.1007/s11292-014-9223-6
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11292-014-9223-6

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Among the reviewed studies, four delivered one-time communication skills training to in-service officers with no future retraining, while two integrated communication skills training into the curriculum for new recruits.

    “Specifically, four studies featured one-time delivery of communication skills training to in-service officers with no future re-training (Owens et al., 2016;Schaefer & Hughes, 2016;Skogan et al., 2015;Wheller et al., 2013), while the other two programs involved integrating communication skills training into the curriculum for new recruits (Robertson et al., 2014;Rosenbaum & Lawrence, 2013).”

    From Randomized controlled trial of social interaction police training (2020) · cites this paper as Skogan et al., 2015

  • Reviewed studies varied in outcomes measured, with some using attitudinal measures and others using behavioral measures of officers' social interaction skills.

    “Second, studies varied in the outcomes measured.Several studies included attitudinal measures as outcomes (Rosenbaum & Lawrence, 2013;Schaefer & Hughes;Skogan et al., 2015), while others relied on behavioral measures of officers' social interaction skills (Owens et al., 2016;Wheller et al., 2013).”

    From Randomized controlled trial of social interaction police training (2020) · cites this paper as Skogan et al., 2015

  • Research points to desirable benefits from procedural justice policing, including heightened popular legitimacy, increased acceptance of police authority, and greater public cooperation with the police.

    “Research points to desirable benefits from this type of policing, including heightened popular legitimacy, increased acceptance of police authority, and greater public cooperation with the police (15–18).”

    From Procedural justice training reduces police use of force and complaints against officers (2020) · cites this paper as [15]

  • Skogan et al. found that participation in the Chicago training program increased police officers' expressed support for using procedural justice strategies in the community.

    “Skogan et al. (15) found that participation in the Chicago training program studied here increased police officers’ expressed support for using procedural justice strategies in the community.”

    From Procedural justice training reduces police use of force and complaints against officers (2020) · cites this paper as [15]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Skogan, W. G., Van Craen, M., & Hennessy, C.
Affiliations
Northwestern University (US)
Corresponding author
Skogan, Wesley G.
Venue
Journal of Experimental Criminology
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2014-12-17
Volume
11
Issue
3
Pages
319-334
ISSN
  • 1572-8315 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3750
DOI
10.1007/s11292-014-9223-6
OpenAlex
W2042740922
Cited by
244
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 3
FWCI
78.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
Locations
Journal of Experimental Criminology (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation
  • Joyce Foundation
  • Northwestern University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Policing Practices and Perceptions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Human Resource Development and Performance Evaluation
  • Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
Keywords
procedural justice, police training, police-community relations, organizational change, police academy, officer attitudes, citizen voice, dignity and respect, neutrality, trust, Chicago Police Department

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review