Cited by 429Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removalEnvironmental remediation with nanomaterialsChromium effects and bioremediation

Chromium removal from water by activated carbon developed from waste rubber tires

Gupta, Vinod Kumar, Ali, Imran, Saleh, Tawfik A., Siddiqui, M. N., Agarwal, Shilpi·2013·Environmental Science and Pollution Research

Abstract

Because of the continuous production of large amount of waste tires, the disposal of waste tires represents a major environmental issue throughout the world. This paper reports the utilization of waste tires (hard-to-dispose waste) as a precursor in the production of activated carbons (pollution-cleaning adsorbent). In the preparation of activated carbon (AC), waste rubber tire (WRT) was thermally treated and activated. The tire-derived activated carbon was characterized by means of scanning electron microscope, energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy, FTIR spectrophotometer, and X-ray diffraction. In the IR spectrum, a number of bands centred at about 3409, 2350, 1710, 1650, and 1300-1000 cm(-1) prove the present of hydroxyl and carboxyl groups on the surface of AC in addition to C═C double bonds. The developed AC was tested and evaluated as potential adsorbent removal of chromium (III). Experimental parameters, such as contact time, initial concentration, adsorbent dosage and pH were optimized. A rapid uptake of chromium ions was observed and the equilibrium is achieved in 1 h. It was also found that the adsorption process is pH dependent. This work adds to the global discussion of the cost-effective utilization of waste rubber tires for waste water treatment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11356-012-0950-9

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gupta, V. K., Ali, I., Saleh, T. A., Siddiqui, M. N., & Agarwal, S.
Affiliations
  • King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals (SA)
  • Jamia Millia Islamia (IN)
  • Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee (IN)
Corresponding author
Gupta, Vinod Kumar
Venue
Environmental Science and Pollution Research
Published
2012-05-10
Volume
20
Issue
3
Pages
1261-1268
ISSN
  • 0944-1344 (ISSN-L)
  • 1614-7499
OpenAlex
W1996766631
Cited by
429
References
36
Citations by year
2025: 12 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 73 · 2020: 97 · 2019: 63 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 6
FWCI
17.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Environmental Science and Pollution Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Environmental remediation with nanomaterials
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Chromium effects and bioremediation
Keywords
chromium removal, activated carbon, waste tires, adsorption, heavy metal removal, wastewater treatment, pH effect on adsorption, surface functional groups, waste tire recycling
MeSH terms
Adsorption, Charcoal, Chromium, Microscopy, Electron, Scanning, Rubber, Spectrometry, X-Ray Emission, X-Ray Diffraction, Spectroscopy, Fourier Transform Infrared, Water Purification, Wastewater

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review