Cited by 75Animal Nutrition and PhysiologyAquaculture Nutrition and GrowthMeat and Animal Product Quality

Effects of Spirulina platensis and amphora coffeaeformis as dietary supplements on blood biochemical parameters, intestinal microbial population, and productive performance in broiler chickens

Alwaleed, Eman A., El-Sheekh, Mostafa, Abdel-Daim, Mohamed M., Saber, Hani·2021·Environmental Science and Pollution Research

Abstract

Spirulina platensis (Sp) or Amphora coffeaeformis (Am) are good candidates as an in-feed antibiotic substitute for broilers. This work was performed to investigate the effects of Sp and Am on the growth performance, intestinal microbial population, physiological responses, and blood biochemical constituents in broiler chickens. Fifty-one-day old Cobb broilers (with initial body weights 50-55 g) were allocated to five groups. Each treatment group had five replicate pens with two birds each. The experiments lasted for 35 days. The 1st group had basal diet (control group). The 2nd and 3rd groups received basal diet, along with 5- or 10-g/kg Sp as a feed ingredient, respectively. While the 4th and 5th groups received basal diet, along with 5- or 10-g/kg Am as a feed ingredient, respectively. Data analysis revealed significantly higher body weight gains (P ≤ 0.05) with higher Sp or Am levels and, in turn, linear improvements (P ≤ 0.05) in feed conversion values. In addition, intestinal Lactobacillus sp. was increased, and Escherichia coli populations were decreased by both dietary Sp levels or Am levels. Furthermore, the liver (% body weight) was significantly decreased (P ≤ 0.05) and the heart (% body weight) was significantly increased (P ≤ 0.05) with higher Sp or Am levels in comparison with untreated control. In conclusion, dietary inclusion with 10 g/kg of Sp and Am could improve the growth performance, serum biochemical parameters and intestinal microbial population in broiler chickens.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11356-020-10597-3

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Alwaleed, E. A., El-Sheekh, M., Abdel-Daim, M. M., & Saber, H.
Affiliations
  • South Valley University (EG)
  • Tanta University (EG)
Venue
Environmental Science and Pollution Research
Published
2020-08-28
Volume
28
Issue
2
Pages
1801-1811
ISSN
  • 0944-1344 (ISSN-L)
  • 1614-7499
OpenAlex
W3082616450
Cited by
75
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 8
FWCI
5.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Environmental Science and Pollution Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
King Saud University (Deanship of Scientific Research, College of Science Research Center.)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Nutrition and Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Meat and Animal Product Quality
Keywords
Spirulina platensis, Amphora coffeaeformis, dietary supplements, broiler chickens, antibiotic alternatives, growth performance, feed conversion ratio, gut microbiota, Lactobacillus, Escherichia coli, serum biochemistry, organ weight, liver, heart
MeSH terms
Animals, Animal Feed, Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena, Chickens, Diet, Dietary Supplements, Spirulina

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review