Cited by 20Virtual Reality Applications and ImpactsInnovative Teaching and Learning MethodsOnline and Blended Learning

Exploring Students’ Immersive VR Experiences as Resources for Collaborative Meaning Making and Learning

Open access
Silseth, Kenneth, Steier, Rolf, Arnseth, Hans Christian·2024·International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning

Abstract

By adopting a situated and interactional approach, we explore students’ immersive VR experiences as resources for collaborative meaning making and learning. We draw on data from a project in which teachers and researchers co-developed a learning design for upper secondary students involving immersive VR technology. In this learning design, students viewed a cinematic VR film where they encountered different people telling personal stories about exclusion and discrimination, followed by reflective group dialogues with their teacher about their experiences in this environment. Through a detailed interaction analysis of these dialogues, we identify four dimensions that characterize students’ meaning making: (1) the feeling of taking part in conversations, (2) attending to bodily expressions of others, (3) students’ own bodily responses, (4) teacher guidance. We discuss how the findings from our analysis contribute to the field of CSCL, and which also have implications for instructional work that includes the use of immersive VR environments.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11412-023-09413-0

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Hall, R., & Stevens, R. (2016). Interaction analysis approaches to knowledge in use. In A. di Sessa, M. Levin, & J. S. Brown (Eds.), Knowledge and interaction: A synthetic agenda for the learning sciences (pp. 72-108). Routledge.
  2. Lemke, J. (2001). Articulating communities: Sociocultural perspectives on science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(3), 296-316.

Authors
Silseth, K., Steier, R., & Arnseth, H. C.
Affiliations
  • University of Oslo (NO)
  • OsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University (NO)
Corresponding author
Silseth, Kenneth
Venue
International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning
Published
2024-02-15
Volume
19
Issue
1
Pages
11-36
ISSN
  • 1556-1607 (ISSN-L)
  • 1556-1615
OpenAlex
W4391838224
Cited by
20
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 1
FWCI
5.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
University of Oslo
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
Keywords
immersive virtual reality, collaborative meaning-making, discrimination and exclusion, situated interaction, body expression, teacher guidance, high school students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review