Cited by 46Homelessness and Social IssuesHIV, Drug Use, Sexual RiskSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

Provider views of harm reduction versus abstinence policies within homeless services for dually diagnosed adults

Open access
Henwood, Benjamin F., Padgett, Deborah K., Tiderington, Emmy·2014·The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research

Abstract

Harm reduction is considered by many to be a legitimate alternative to abstinence-based services for dually diagnosed individuals, yet there is limited understanding of how varying approaches affect front-line practice within services for homeless adults. This paper examines how front-line providers working with individuals who have experienced homelessness, serious mental illness, and addiction view policies of harm reduction versus abstinence within two different approaches to homeless services: the traditional or "treatment first" approach that requires abstinence, and the more recent housing first approach that incorporates harm reduction. As part of a federally funded qualitative study, 129 in-depth interviews conducted with 41 providers were thematically analyzed to understand how providers view harm reduction versus abstinence approaches. Themes included the following: (a) harm reduction as a welcomed alternative, (b) working with ambiguity, and (c) accommodating abstinence. Drawing on recovery principles, the authors consider the broader implications of the findings for behavioral health care with this population.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11414-013-9318-2

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Harm reduction allowed service providers to have flexibility in their roles, as they were not required to enforce rules related to abstinence from substance use like providers of continuum-based housing programs.

    “Harm reduction allowed service providers to have flexibility in their roles, as they were not required to enforce rules related to abstinence from substance use like providers of continuumbased housing programs (Andvig et al., 2018; Henwood et al., 2014).”
  • HF providers reported that a harm reduction approach allowed tenants to be more open about their substance use and stay engaged in services.

    “HF providers reported that a harm reduction approach allowed tenants to be more open about their substance use and stay engaged in services”
  • The flexibility also posed challenges for service providers, such as determining when to intervene and producing ambiguity about whether or not they were 'doing enough' to support tenants.

    “Yet, the flexibility also posed challenges for service providers, such as determining when to intervene and producing ambiguity about whether or not they were 'doing enough' to support tenants (Henwood et al., 2013, 2014; Tiderington et al., 2013).”
  • Harm reduction involved supporting tenants to make 'difficult choices,' such as drawing boundaries in response to an apartment takeover.

    “Harm reduction involved supporting tenants to make 'difficult choices,' such as drawing boundaries in response to an apartment takeover”
  • TF providers evoked discretionary power when enforcing consequences and rules, yielding ambiguity.

    “TF providers also evoked discretionary power when enforcing consequences and rules, yielding ambiguity”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [27]McLellan AT Carise D Kleber HD Can the national addiction treatment infrastructure support the public's demand for quality care? Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 2003 25 2 117 121 14680015

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Henwood, B. F., Padgett, D. K., & Tiderington, E.
Affiliations
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • New York University (US)
Corresponding author
Henwood, Benjamin F.
Venue
The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research
Published
2013-02-13
Volume
41
Issue
1
Pages
80-89
ISSN
  • 1094-3412 (ISSN-L)
  • 1556-3308
OpenAlex
W2006217459
Cited by
46
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3
FWCI
4.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Rutgers University Community Repository (Rutgers University) (acceptedVersion)
  • Rutgers University Community Repository (Rutgers University)
Funders
  • U.S. Public Health Service (R01-69865)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH069865, R01MH084903, F31MH083372)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Homelessness and Social Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Keywords
harm reduction, abstinence-based treatment, homelessness services, Housing First, severe mental illness, addiction, provider perspectives, recovery principles, behavioral health services
MeSH terms
Adult, Attitude of Health Personnel, Mental Disorders, Female, Ill-Housed Persons, Housing, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Longitudinal Studies, Male, New York, Diagnosis, Dual (Psychiatry), Substance-Related Disorders, Qualitative Research, Harm Reduction, Community-Based Participatory Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review