Cited by 220Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesHIV, Drug Use, Sexual RiskHomelessness and Social Issues

Update on harm-reduction policy and intervention research

Marlatt, G. Alan, Witkiewitz, Katie·2010·Annual Review of Clinical Psychology

Abstract

Harm reduction is a pragmatic approach to reduce the harmful consequences of alcohol and drug use or other high-risk activities by incorporating several strategies that cut across the spectrum from safer use to managed use to abstinence. The primary goal of most harm-reduction approaches is to meet individuals “where they are at” and not to ignore or condemn the harmful behaviors but rather to work with the individual or community to minimize the harmful effects of a given behavior. The current review addresses some of the newest developments with respect to harm-reduction policy, prevention, and treatment. In particular, this review highlights policies and programs that have been evaluated in peer-reviewed journals and shown to be effective at reducing the harms associated with alcohol and drug use. The overall goal of this review is to present some of the most recent developments in the field of harm reduction.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.121208.131438

Cites

78 of 78 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • 'Meeting people where they are at' and delivering services in a nonjudgmental way is a principal component of harm reduction.

    “As 'meeting people where they are at' and delivering services in a nonjudgmental way is a principal component of harm reduction (Marlatt and Witkiewitz, 2010)”

    From Harm reduction outcomes and practices in Housing First: A mixed-methods systematic review (2021) · cites this paper as Marlatt and Witkiewitz, 2010

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 79 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Marlatt, G. A., & Witkiewitz, K.
Affiliations
University of Washington (US)
Venue
Annual Review of Clinical Psychology
Published
2010-03-01
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
591-606
ISSN
  • 1548-5943 (ISSN-L)
  • 1548-5951
OpenAlex
W2113041994
Cited by
220
References
79
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 8
FWCI
1.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annual Review of Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Homelessness and Social Issues
Keywords
harm reduction, harm reduction policy, alcohol consumption, drug use, substance use prevention, addiction treatment, harm reduction interventions, abstinence
MeSH terms
Mental Disorders, Drug Therapy, Health Policy, Health Promotion, Humans, Psychotherapy, Public Policy, Temperance, Comorbidity, Diagnosis, Dual (Psychiatry), Substance-Related Disorders, Harm Reduction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review