Cited by 214Online and Blended LearningCultural Competency in Health CareGlobal Education and Multiculturalism

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cultural competence and instructional design: Exploration research into the delivery of online instruction cross-culturally

Rogers, P. Clint, Graham, Charles R., Mayes, Clifford T.·2007·Educational Technology Research and Development

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11423-007-9033-x

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Burnham, B. (2005). The adult learner and implications for the craft of instructional design, A paper presented at the 9th Annual Global Conference on Computers in Chinese Education, Laie, Hawaii.
  2. Kawachi, P. (2000). To understand the interactions between personality and cultural differences among learners in global distance education: A study of Japanese learning in higher education. Indian Journal of Open Learning, 9(1), 41–62.
  3. Looi, C. (2003). Cultural issues and the design of e-learning, Proceedings of the First International Conference on Educational Technology in Cultural Context, Joensuu, Finland, 45–59.
  4. Maitland, C. F., & Bauer, J. M. (2001). National level culture and global diffusion: The case of the Internet, In C. Ess & F. Sudweeks (Eds.), Culture, Technology, Communication: Towards an Intercultural Global Village (pp. 87–120). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
  5. Massy, J. (2005). The integration of learning technologies into Europe’s education and training systems, In C. J. Bonk & C. R. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs (pp. 419–431). San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer Publishing.
  6. Mbambo, B., & Cronje, J. C. (2005). User acceptance of an Internet site for women in the textile industry in Botswana, Submitted to IEEE on 10 Oct. 05.
  7. Monajemi, E. (2003). Adaptation of new information technologies to the cultural, educational and economical contexts as an important factor in development, Proceedings of the First International Conference on Educational Technology in Cultural Context. Joensuu, Finland, 45–59.
  8. Rose, K. (2005). Intercultural human-machine systems: Empiracle study of user requirements in mainland China. In N. Aykin (Ed.), Usability and Internationalization of Information Technology (pp. 277–312). Mahway, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 214

Metadata

Authors
Rogers, P. C., Graham, C. R., & Mayes, C. T.
Affiliations
Brigham Young University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Rogers, P. Clint
  • Graham, Charles R.
  • Mayes, Clifford T.
Venue
Educational Technology Research and Development
Published
2007-03-09
Volume
55
Issue
2
Pages
197-217
ISSN
  • 1042-1629 (ISSN-L)
  • 1556-6501
OpenAlex
W2068852622
Cited by
214
References
53
Citations by year
2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 18
FWCI
47.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Educational Technology Research and Development (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Cultural Competency in Health Care
  • Social Sciences › Education › Global Education and Multiculturalism
Keywords
cultural competence, instructional design, online instruction, intercultural education, cultural differences in learning, professional experience, learner expectations, Western universities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review