CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 32

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Assessing Internet Addiction Using the Parsimonious Internet Addiction Components Model—A Preliminary Study

Kuss, Daria J., Shorter, Gillian W., van Rooij, Antonius J., Griffiths, Mark D., Schoenmakers, Tim M.·2013·International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction
DOI 10.1007/s11469-013-9459-9
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11469-013-9459-9

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 64

  1. American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual for mental disorders IV, text-revision. Washington: American Psychiatric Association.
  2. American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5). Arlington: American Psychiatric Association. · DOI · Paper page
  3. Andreassen, C. S., Griffiths, M. D., Hetland, J., & Pallesen, S. (2012a). Development of a work addiction scale. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 53(3), 265–272. · DOI
  4. Armstrong, L., Phillips, J. G., & Saling, L. L. (2000). Potential determinants of heavier internet usage. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 53(4), 537–550. · DOI · Paper page
  5. Beard, K. W. (2005). Internet addiction: a review of current assessment techniques and potential assessment questions. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 8(1), 7–14. · DOI · Paper page
  6. Blaszczynski, A. (2006). Internet use: in search of an addiction. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 4, 7–9. · DOI
  7. Blum, K., Cull, J. G., Braverman, E. R., & Comings, D. E. (1996). Reward deficiency syndrome. American Scientist, 84(2), 132–145.
  8. Boomsma, A. (2000). Reporting analyses of covariance structures. Structural Equation Modeling—A Multidisciplinary Journal, 7(3), 461–483. · DOI · Paper page
  9. Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York: Guilford.
  10. Cao, H., Sun, Y., Wan, Y., Hao, J., & Tao, F. (2011). Problematic Internet use in Chinese adolescents and its relation to psychosomatic symptoms and life satisfaction. Bmc Public Health, 11. · DOI
  11. Clark, M., & Calleja, K. (2008). Shopping addiction: a preliminary investigation among Maltese university students. Addiction Research & Theory, 16(6), 633–649. · DOI
  12. Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159. · DOI · Paper page
  13. Conner, B. T., Stein, J. A., Longshore, D., & Stacy, A. W. (1999). Associations between drug abuse treatment and cigarette use: evidence of substance replacement. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 7(1), 64–71. · DOI
  14. Dong, G., Zhou, H., & Zhao, X. (2011). Male Internet addicts show impaired executive control ability: evidence from a color-word Stroop task. Neuroscience Letters, 499(2), 114–118. · DOI
  15. Flora, D. B., & Curran, P. J. (2004). An empirical evaluation of alternative methods of estimation for confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data. Psychological Methods, 9(4), 466–491. · DOI
  16. Glasner-Edwards, S., & Rawson, R. (2010). Evidence-based practices in addiction treatment: review and recommendations for public policy. Health Policy, 97(2–3), 93–104. · DOI
  17. Gray, L., Thomas, N., & Lewis, L. (2010). Teachers’ use of educational technology in U.S. public schools: 2009 (NCES 2010-040). Washington: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
  18. Griffiths, M. (1993). Tolerance in gambling: an objective measure using the psychophysiological analysis of male fruit machine gamblers. Addictive Behaviors, 18, 365–372. · DOI
  19. Griffiths, M. D. (2010). The use of online methodologies in data collection. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 8(1), 8–20. · DOI
  20. Griffiths, M. D., Szabo, A., & Terry, A. (2005). The exercise addiction inventory: a quick and easy screening tool for health practitioners. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 39(6), e30. · DOI
  21. Hayduk, L. A., & Glaser, D. N. (2000). Jiving the four-step, waltzing around factor analysis, and other serious fun. Structural Equation Modeling, 7(1), 1–35. · DOI
  22. Hellman, M., Schoenmakers, T. M., Nordstrom, B. R., & Van Holst, R. J. (2012). Is there such a thing as online video game addiction? A cross-disciplinary review. Addiction Research & Theory, (online first).
  23. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling—A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. · DOI · Paper page
  24. Kaltiala-Heino, R., Lintonen, T., & Rimpela, A. (2004). Internet addiction? Potentially problematic use of the Internet in a population of 12–18 year-old adolescents. Addiction Research & Theory, 12(1), 89–96. · DOI
  25. King, D. L., & Delfabbro, P. H. (2013). Video-gaming disorder and the DSM-5: some further thoughts. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 47(9), 875–876. · DOI
  26. Ko, C. H., Yen, J. Y., Chen, C. S., Yeh, Y. C., & Yen, C. F. (2009). Predictive values of psychiatric symptoms for Internet addiction in adolescents: a 2-year prospective study. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 163(10), 937–943. · DOI
  27. Koob, G. F., & Le Moal, M. (1997). Drug abuse: hedonic homeostatic dysregulation. Science, 278(5335), 52–58. · DOI · Paper page
  28. Koob, G. F., & Le Moal, M. (2001). Drug addiction, dysregulation of reward, and allostasis. Neuropsychopharmacology, 24, 97–129. · DOI · Paper page
  29. Kuss, D. J. (2012). Substance and behavioral addictions: beyond dependence. Journal of Addiction Research and Therapy, S6, e001.
  30. Kuss, D. J., Griffiths, M. D., & Binder, J. F. (2013a). Internet addiction in students: prevalence and risk factors. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 959–966. · DOI · Paper page
  31. Kuss, D. J., van Rooij, A., Shorter, G. W., Griffiths, M. D., & van de Mheen, D. (2013b). Internet addiction in adolescents: prevalence and risk factors. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(5), 1987–1996. · DOI
  32. Larkin, M., & Griffiths, M. D. (2002). Experiences of addiction and recovery: the case for subjective accounts. Addiction Research & Theory, 10(3), 281–311. · DOI
  33. Leung, L., & Lee, P. S. N. (2012). Impact of Internet literacy, Internet addiction symptoms, and Internet activities on academic performance. Social Science Computer Review, 30(4), 403–418. · DOI
  34. Lin, F., Zhou, Y., Du, Y., Qin, L., Zhao, Z., Xu, J., et al. (2012). Abnormal white matter integrity in adolescents with Internet Addiction Disorder: a tract-based spatial statistics study. Plos One, 7(1), e30253. · DOI
  35. Littel, M., Luijten, M., van den Berg, I., van Rooij, A., Keemink, L., & Franken, I. (2012). Error-processing and response inhibition in excessive computer game players: an ERP study. Addiction Biology, 17(5), 934–947. · DOI
  36. Liu, C.-Y., & Kuo, F.-Y. (2007). A study of Internet addiction through the lens of the interpersonal theory. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 10(6), 799–804. · DOI
  37. Liu, J., Gao, X. P., Osunde, I., Li, X., Zhou, S. K., Zheng, H. R., et al. (2010). Increased regional homogeneity in internet addiction disorder: a resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Chinese Medical Journal, 123(14), 1904–1908.
  38. Lopez-Moreno, J. A., Gonzalez-Cuevas, G., Moreno, G., & Navarro, M. (2008). The pharmacology of the endocannabinoid system: functional and structural interactions with other neurotransmitter systems and their repercussions in behavioral addiction. Addiction Biology, 13(2), 160–187. · DOI
  39. MacCallum, R. C. (1986). Specification searches in covariance structure modeling. Psychological Bulletin, 100(1), 107–120. · DOI
  40. McLellan, A. T., & Meyers, K. (2004). Contemporary addiction treatment: a review of systems problems for adults and adolescents. Biological Psychiatry, 56(10), 764–770. · DOI
  41. Müller, K. W., Ammerschläger, M., Freisleder, F. J., Beutel, M. E., & Wölfling, K. (2012). Addictive Internet use as a comorbid disorder among clients of an adolescent psychiatry—prevalence and psychopathological symptoms. [Suchtartige Internetnutzung als komorbide Störung im jugendpsychiatrischen Setting.]. Zeitschrift für Kinder- und Jugendpsychiatrie und Psychotherapie, 40(5), 331–339. · DOI
  42. Murali, V., & George, S. (2007). Lost online: an overview of internet addiction. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment, 13(1), 24–30. · DOI
  43. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2011). Mplus user’s guide (6th ed.). Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.
  44. Nichols, L. A., & Nicki, R. (2004). Development of a psychometrically sound Internet addiction scale: a preliminary step. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 18(4), 381–384. · DOI
  45. Niemz, K., Griffiths, M., & Banyard, P. (2005). Prevalence of pathological Internet use among university students and correlations with self-esteem, the general health questionnaire (GHQ), and disinhibition. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 8(6), 562–570. · DOI
  46. Paulhus, D. L., & Vazire, S. (2009). The self-report method. In R. W. Robins, R. C. Fraley, & R. F. Krueger (Eds.), Handbook or research methods in personality psychology (pp. 224–239). New York: Guilford.
  47. Pies, R. (2009). Should DSM-V designate “Internet addiction” a mental disorder? Psychiatry, 6(2), 31–37.
  48. Rumpf, H. J., Meyer, C., Kreuzer, A., & John, U. (2011). Prävalenz der Internetabhängigkeit (PINTA). Bericht an das Bundesministerium für Gesundheit. Greifswald: Universität zu Lübeck, Universitätsmedizin Greifswald.
  49. Shaffer, H. J., Hall, M. N., & Vander Bilt, J. (2000). “Computer addiction”: a critical consideration. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 70(2), 162–168. · DOI
  50. Smith, G. W., Farrell, M., Bunting, B. P., Houston, J. E., & Shevlin, M. (2001). Patterns of polydrug use in Great Britian: findings from a national household population survey. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 113(2–3), 222–228.
  51. Starcevic, V. (2013). Video-gaming disorder and behavioural addictions. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 47(3), 285–286. · DOI
  52. Steiger, J. H. (2000). Point estimation, hypothesis testing, and interval estimation using the RMSEA: some comments and a reply to Hayduk and Glaser. Structural Equation Modeling, 7(2), 149–162. · DOI
  53. Steiger, J. H. (2007). Understanding the limitations of global fit assessment in structural equation modeling. Personality & Individual Differences, 42(5), 893–898. · DOI · Paper page
  54. Treuer, T., Fabian, Z., & Furedi, J. (2001). Internet addiction associated with features of impulse control disorder: is it a real psychiatric disorder? Journal of Affective Disorders, 66(2–3), 283–283. · DOI
  55. Tsai, C. C., & Lin, S. S. J. (2003). Internet addiction of adolescents in Taiwan: an interview study. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 6(6), 649–652. · DOI
  56. van Rooij, A. J., Schoenmakers, T. M., Vermulst, A. A., van den Eijnden, R. J. J. M., & van de Mheen, D. (2011). Online video game addiction: identification of addicted adolescent gamers. Addiction, 106(1), 205–212. · DOI
  57. Volkow, N. D., Fowler, J. S., Wang, G.-J., Swanson, J. M., & Telang, F. (2007). Dopamine in drug abuse and addiction—results of imaging studies and treatment implications. Archives of Neurology, 64(11), 1575–1579. · DOI · Paper page
  58. Wölfling, K., Müller, K., & Beutel, M. (2010). Diagnostic measures: Scale for the assessment of internet and computer game addiction (AICA-S). In D. Mücken, A. Teske, F. Rehbein, & B. te Wildt (Eds.), Prevention, diagnostics, and therapy of computer game addiction (pp. 212–215). Lengerich: Pabst Science.
  59. World Health Organization. (1992). ICD 10: The ICD-10 classification of mental and behavioral disorders: Clinical descriptions and diagnostic guidelines. Geneva: World Health Organization.
  60. Young, K. (1999). Internet addiction: Symptoms, evaluation, and treatment. In L. V. T. L. Jackson (Ed.), Innovations in clinical practice. Sarasota: Professional Resource Press.
  61. Young, K. S. (2004). Internet addiction—a new clinical phenomenon and its consequences. American Behavioral Scientist, 48(4), 402–415. · DOI · Paper page
  62. Young, K. (2010). Internet addiction over the decade: a personal look back. World Psychiatry, 9(2), 91–91. · DOI
  63. Yu, C. F. (2002). Evaluating cutoff criteria of model fit indices for latent variable models with binary and continuous outcomes. Dissertation. University of California. Los Angeles. Retrieved from http://statmodel2.com/download/Yudissertation.pdf .
  64. Yuen, C. N., & Lavin, M. J. (2004). Internet dependence in the collegiate population: the role of shyness. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 7(4), 379–383. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 32

Metadata

Authors
Kuss, D. J., Shorter, G. W., van Rooij, A. J., Griffiths, M. D., & Schoenmakers, T. M.
Venue
International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2013-10-19
ISSN
  • 1557-1874
  • 1557-1882
DOI
10.1007/s11469-013-9459-9
Cited by
32
References
16
Language
en
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review