Cited by 2,360Psychometric Methodologies and TestingStatistical Methods and Bayesian InferenceMental Health Research Topics

Understanding the limitations of global fit assessment in structural equation modeling

Steiger, James H.·2007·Personality and Individual Differences

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.paid.2006.09.017

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The CFA results indicate a good model fit for students' knowledge, student-perceived value, and student-perceived cost.

    “The results in Table 6 indicate a good model fit regarding students' knowledge, student-perceived value, and student-perceived cost with all less than 3 (Schermelleh-Engel et al., 2003), the root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) all lower than 0.07 (Steiger, 2007) and standardized root mean square residual (SRMR) lower than 0.080 (Hu & Bentler, 1999).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Steiger, J. H.
Affiliations
Vanderbilt University (US)
Corresponding author
Steiger, James H.
Venue
Personality and Individual Differences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-05
Volume
42
Issue
5
Pages
893-898
ISSN
0191-8869 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2104709233
Cited by
2,360
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 80 · 2025: 194 · 2024: 196 · 2023: 217 · 2022: 233 · 2021: 222 · 2020: 198 · 2019: 186 · 2018: 160 · 2017: 157 · 2016: 122 · 2015: 118 · 2014: 105 · 2013: 76 · 2012: 48
FWCI
9.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Personality and Individual Differences (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
Keywords
model fit assessment, structural equation modeling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review