Cited by 167Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorTryptophan and brain disorders

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 168 of the 170 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 2 are not checked yet.

The Role of Oxidative Stress, Metabolic Compromise, and Inflammation in Neuronal Injury Produced by Amphetamine-Related Drugs of Abuse

Open access
Yamamoto, Bryan K., Raudensky, Jamie·2008·Journal of Neuroimmune Pharmacology

Abstract

Methamphetamine (METH) and 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA, ecstasy) are amphetamine derivatives with high abuse liability. These amphetamine-related drugs of abuse mediate their effects through the acute activation of both dopaminergic and serotonergic neurons. Long-term abuse of these amphetamine derivatives, however, results in damage to both dopaminergic and serotonergic terminals throughout the brain. This toxicity is mediated in part by oxidative stress, metabolic compromise, and inflammation. The overall objective of this review is to highlight experimental evidence that METH and MDMA increase oxidative stress, produce mitochondrial dysfunction, and increase inflammation that converge and culminate in the long-term toxicity to dopaminergic and serotonergic neurons.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11481-008-9121-7

Cites

168 of 170 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 168 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 167

Metadata

Authors
Yamamoto, B. K., & Raudensky, J.
Affiliations
Boston University (US)
Corresponding author
Yamamoto, Bryan K.
Venue
Journal of Neuroimmune Pharmacology
Published
2008-08-15
Volume
3
Issue
4
Pages
203-217
ISSN
  • 1557-1890 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-1904
OpenAlex
W2135980918
Cited by
167
References
168
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 16
FWCI
1.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroimmune Pharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA007606)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Biological Psychiatry › Tryptophan and brain disorders
Keywords
methamphetamine, MDMA, ecstasy, oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, neuroinflammation, dopaminergic neurons, serotonergic neurons, neuronal injury, neurotoxicity, drug abuse
MeSH terms
Amphetamines, Animals, Brain, Humans, Inflammation, Neurons, Illicit Drugs, Oxidative Stress

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review