Cited by 40Education during COVID-19 pandemicOnline and Blended LearningTechnology-Enhanced Education Studies

Development and Validation of an Attitude Scale towards Online Teaching and Learning for Higher Education Teachers

Open access
Sangwan, Anupma, Sangwan, Anurag, Punia, Poonam·2021·TechTrends

Abstract

The aim of this study is to develop an attitude scale towards online teaching and learning for higher education teachers. It included 687 participants (77 Professors, 67 Associate Professors and 543 Assistant Professors) from various colleges and Universities of India. This tool development was a part of research conducted to examine the preparedness of Indian higher education teachers during the period of lockdown due to Covid-19 pandemic. After reviewing related literature, initially 37 items related with the attitude of teachers towards online education were framed. Later on, 11 items were modified and four were deleted as per the opinions of the experts. The draft scale consisting of 33 items was administered on teachers and data was collected with the help of Google forms. Item analysis was carried out using t-value and r-value. Reliability of scale was determined by using Cronbach Alpha value (0.88) and split-halt correlation (0.82). After item analysis, the scale items were reduced to 30 and four factors were established as a result of factor analysis (Principal Component Analysis). Psychometric scale analyses have shown that this scale is valid, reliable and thus can be used in the evaluation of teachers 'attitudes towards online teaching and learning.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11528-020-00561-w

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The participants' reflections illustrate a transformative experience through the UST series, reflecting a blend of cognitive and affective learning outcomes and driving a commitment to apply new knowledge.

    “The participants' reflections illustrate a transformative experience through the UST series and their testimonials reflect a blend of cognitive and affective learning outcomes (Brinkley-Etzkorn, 2020;Naylor & Nyanjom, 2021;Sangwan et al., 2021), driving a commitment to apply this new knowledge.”

    From Transforming Online Teacher Training Through Expansive Learning: A Case Study Applying Cultural-Historical Activity Theory and the Change Laboratory Method (2025) · cites this paper as Sangwan et al., 2021

    The Introduction (page unavailable) describes attitude as involving cognitive, affective, and behavioural experience, and the Conceptual Framework links attitude development to knowledge and feelings. Those passages provide a conceptual link to the cited phrase, but they do not examine UST participants’ testimonials or establish cognitive and affective learning outcomes from that series. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 60 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Garrison DR E-learning in the 21st century 2011 London Routledge Taylor & Francis Group
  2. Girgurovic, M. (2010). Technology-enhanced blended language learning in an ESL class: a description of a model and application of the diffusion of innovation theory. Unpublished PhD Thesis, Iowa State University
  3. Graff M Cognitive style and attitudes towards online learning and assessment methods Electronic Journal of e-Learning Methods 2003 1 1 21 28
  4. Kalanda, K. (2005). Factors influencing college students’ attitude towards technology. Unpublished master’s dissertation, University of South Africa. Retrieved from https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/43165004.pdf.
  5. Suri G Sharma S Investigation of Teacher’s attitude towards e-learning-a case study of Panjab University, Chandigarh, India Gian Jyoti E-Journal 2016 6 3 1 10

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sangwan, A., Sangwan, A., & Punia, P.
Affiliations
Guru Jambheshwar University of Science and Technology (IN)
Corresponding author
Punia, Poonam
Venue
TechTrends
Published
2020-11-12
Volume
65
Issue
2
Pages
187-195
ISSN
  • 1559-7075 (ISSN-L)
  • 8756-3894
OpenAlex
W3098110668
Cited by
40
References
60
Citations by year
2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 4
FWCI
10.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • TechTrends (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education during COVID-19 pandemic
  • Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
  • Social Sciences › Education › Technology-Enhanced Education Studies
Keywords
attitude scales, online learning, higher education teachers, teacher readiness, COVID-19 lockdown, scale development, psychometric validation, factor analysis, reliability statistics, India

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review