Cited by 102Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome ResearchPsychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation

Sustained pain reduction through affective self-awareness in fibromyalgia: a randomized controlled trial

Open access
Hsu, Michael C., Schubiner, Howard, Lumley, Mark A., Stracks, John S., Clauw, Daniel J., Williams, David A.·2010·Journal of General Internal Medicine

Abstract

Background and objective Affect and how it is regulated plays a role in pain perception, maintenance of pain, and its resolution. This randomized, controlled trial evaluated an innovative affective self-awareness (ASA) intervention, which was designed to reduce pain and improve functioning in individuals with fibromyalgia.Participants and methods Forty-five women with fibromyalgia were randomized to a manualized ASA intervention (n = 24) or wait-list control (n = 21). The intervention began with a one-time physician consultation, followed by 3 weekly, 2-h group sessions based upon a mind-body model of pain. Sessions focused on structured written emotional disclosure and emotional awareness exercises. Outcomes in both conditions were measured by a blinded assessor at baseline, post-intervention, and 6-month follow-up.Measures The primary outcome was pain severity (Brief Pain Inventory); secondary outcomes included tender-point threshold and physical function (SF-36 Physical Component Summary). Intent-to-treat analyses compared groups on outcomes using analysis of covariance and on the proportion of patients achieving ≥ 30% and ≥ 50% pain reduction at 6 months.Results Adjusting for baseline scores, the intervention group had significantly lower pain severity (p < 0.001), higher self-reported physical function (p < 0.001), and higher tender-point threshold (p = 0.02) at 6 months compared to the control group. From baseline to 6 months, 45.8% of the ASA intervention group had ≥ 30% reduction in pain severity, compared to none of the controls (p < 0.001).Conclusions The affective self-awareness intervention improved pain, tenderness, and self-reported physical function for at least 6 months in women with fibromyalgia compared to wait-list control. This study suggests the value of interventions targeting emotional processes in fibromyalgia, although further studies should evaluate the efficacy of this intervention relative to active controls.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11606-010-1418-6

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 65 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [32]32. Selfridge N, Peterson F. Freedom from Fibromyalgia. New York: Three Rivers Press; 2001.
  2. [48]48. Skevington SM. A standardized scale to measure beliefs about controlling pain. (BPCQ): a preliminary study. Psychol Health. 1990; 4:221-32.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hsu, M. C., Schubiner, H., Lumley, M. A., Stracks, J. S., Clauw, D. J., & Williams, D. A.
Affiliations
  • Kaiser Permanente (US)
  • Wayne State University (US)
  • Northwestern University (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Schubiner, Howard
Venue
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Published
2010-06-08
Volume
25
Issue
10
Pages
1064-1070
ISSN
  • 0884-8734 (ISSN-L)
  • 1525-1497
OpenAlex
W1976850677
Cited by
102
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 6
FWCI
3.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of General Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Defense (DAMD170020018)
  • American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
  • National Institutes of Health (5t32hd007422-20)
  • National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (R01AR049059, AR049059)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (K12HD001097, T32-HD007422)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Keywords
fibromyalgia, analgesia, emotional awareness, emotional disclosure, physical function, women, group intervention
MeSH terms
Adult, Affect, Aged, Analgesia, Female, Fibromyalgia, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Middle Aged, Pain, Self Concept, Severity of Illness Index, Time Factors, Treatment Outcome, Mind-Body Therapies, Pain Management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review