Cited by 367Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome ResearchPain Mechanisms and TreatmentsMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation

Efficacy and safety of duloxetine for treatment of fibromyalgia in patients with or without major depressive disorder: Results from a 6-month, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, fixed-dose trial ☆

Russell, Jon I., Mease, Philip J., Smith, Timothy R., Kajdasz, Daniel K., Wohlreich, Madelaine M., Detke, Michael J., Walker, Daniel J., Chappell, Amy S. +1 more·2008·Pain

Abstract

The primary objectives of this study were to assess the efficacy and safety of duloxetine for reducing pain severity in fibromyalgia patients with or without current major depressive disorder. This was a 6-month, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. In total, 520 patients meeting American College of Rheumatology criteria for fibromyalgia were randomly assigned to duloxetine (20 mg/day, 60 mg/day, or 120 mg/day) or placebo, administered once daily, for 6 months (after 3 months, the duloxetine 20-mg/day group titrated to 60 mg/day). The co-primary outcome measures were the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) average pain severity score and Patient Global Impressions of Improvement (PGI-I) score. Safety was assessed via treatment-emergent adverse events, and changes in vital sign, laboratory, and ECG measures. Compared with placebo-treated patients, those patients treated with duloxetine 120 mg/day improved significantly more on the co-primary outcome measures at 3 months (change in BPI score [-2.31 vs -1.39, P<0.001] and PGI-I [2.89 vs 3.39, P=0.004]) and at 6 months (change in BPI [-2.26 vs -1.43, P=0.003] and PGI-I [2.93 vs 3.37, P=0.012]). Compared with placebo, treatment with duloxetine 60 mg/day also significantly improved the co-primary measures at 3 months and BPI at 6 months. Duloxetine was efficacious in patients both with and without major depressive disorder. There were no clinically significant differences between treatment groups in changes in vi…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pain.2008.02.024

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Russell, J. I., Mease, P. J., Smith, T. R., Kajdasz, D. K., Wohlreich, M. M., Detke, M. J., Walker, D. J., Chappell, A. S., & Arnold, L. M.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Eli Lilly (United States) (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • University of Cincinnati (US)
Corresponding author
Chappell, Amy S.
Venue
Pain
Published
2008-06
Volume
136
Issue
3
Pages
432-444
ISSN
0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2128447164
Cited by
367
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 25
FWCI
44.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Eli Lilly and Company
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Keywords
duloxetine, fibromyalgia, major depressive disorder, pain intensity, antidepressant efficacy, drug safety, dose titration, Brief Pain Inventory
MeSH terms
Duloxetine Hydrochloride, Analgesics, Clinical Protocols, Clinical Trials as Topic, Double-Blind Method, Female, Fibromyalgia, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Thiophenes, Placebo Effect, Treatment Outcome, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Adrenergic Uptake Inhibitors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review