Cited by 150Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchPatient-Provider Communication in HealthcareHealth Education and Validation

The Development and Evaluation of an Online Healthcare Toolkit for Autistic Adults and their Primary Care Providers

Open access
Nicolaidis, Christina, Raymaker, Dora, McDonald, Katherine, Kapp, Steven, Weiner, Michael, Ashkenazy, Elesia, Gerrity, Martha, Kripke, Clarissa +2 more·2016·Journal of General Internal Medicine

Abstract

Background The healthcare system is ill-equipped to meet the needs of adults on the autism spectrum.Objective Our goal was to use a community-based participatory research (CBPR) approach to develop and evaluate tools to facilitate the primary healthcare of autistic adults.Design Toolkit development included cognitive interviewing and test-retest reliability studies. Evaluation consisted of a mixed-methods, single-arm pre/post-intervention comparison.Participants A total of 259 autistic adults and 51 primary care providers (PCPs) residing in the United States.Interventions The AASPIRE Healthcare toolkit includes the Autism Healthcare Accommodations Tool (AHAT)-a tool that allows patients to create a personalized accommodations report for their PCP-and general healthcare- and autism-related information, worksheets, checklists, and resources for patients and healthcare providers.Main measures Satisfaction with patient-provider communication, healthcare self-efficacy, barriers to healthcare, and satisfaction with the toolkit's usability and utility; responses to open-ended questions.Key results Preliminary testing of the AHAT demonstrated strong content validity and adequate test-retest stability. Almost all patient participants (>94 %) felt that the AHAT and the toolkit were easy to use, important, and useful. In pre/post-intervention comparisons, the mean number of barriers decreased (from 4.07 to 2.82, p < 0.0001), healthcare self-efficacy increased (from 37.9 to 39.4, p = 0.02), and satisfaction with PCP communication improved (from 30.9 to 32.6, p = 0.03). Patients stated that the toolkit helped clarify their needs, enabled them to self-advocate and prepare for visits more effectively, and positively influenced provider behavior. Most of the PCPs surveyed read the AHAT (97 %), rated it as moderately or very useful (82 %), and would recommend it to other patients (87 %).Conclusions The CBPR process resulted in a reliable healthcare accommodation tool and a highly accessible healthcare toolkit. Patients and providers indicated that the tools positively impacted healthcare interactions. The toolkit has the potential to reduce barriers to healthcare and improve healthcare self-efficacy and patient-provider communication.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11606-016-3763-6

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • AASPIRE's Autism Healthcare Accommodations Tool has decreased the number of barriers to care faced by autistic adults by 30% and improved healthcare provider self-efficacy and patient-provider communication.

    “AASPIRE ' s Autism Healthcare Accommodations Tool -a customized communication and sensory accommodations report builder -has decreased the number of barriers to care faced by autistic adults by 30%, and improved healthcare provider self-ef fi cacy and patient -provider communication.”

    From Tackling healthcare access barriers for individuals with autism from diagnosis to adulthood (2022) · cites this paper as [29]

    The INTERVENTIONS summary reports that mean barriers to care fell from 4.07 to 2.82—about 31%—and that satisfaction with PCP communication improved in a pre/post evaluation. The Toolkit Evaluation Study identifies the increased self-efficacy as patients’ ability to navigate healthcare, not provider self-efficacy. These outcomes were evaluated for the broader toolkit, so the paper does not establish that the AHAT alone caused them. (LLM, conf=0.89)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 24 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Nicolaidis C, Raymaker D, McDonald K, Dern S, Ashkenazy E, Boisclair WC, Robertson S, Baggs A. Collaboration strategies in non-traditional CBPR partnerships: lessons from an academic-community partnership with autistic self-advocates. Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2011;5(2):143-150.
  2. Raymaker D, Nicolaidis C, Boisclair WC, et al. Community based participatory research methods in co-developing an accessible Web site for end users on the autism spectrum. Under review.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nicolaidis, C., Raymaker, D., McDonald, K., Kapp, S., Weiner, M., Ashkenazy, E., Gerrity, M., Kripke, C., Platt, L., & Baggs, A.
Affiliations
  • Portland State University (US)
  • Syracuse University (US)
  • United States Department of Veterans Affairs (US)
  • Oregon Health & Science University (US)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
Corresponding author
Nicolaidis, Christina
Venue
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Published
2016-06-06
Volume
31
Issue
10
Pages
1180-1189
ISSN
  • 0884-8734 (ISSN-L)
  • 1525-1497
OpenAlex
W2416392649
Cited by
150
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3
FWCI
4.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of General Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PDXScholar (Portland State University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R34MH092503)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
  • Social Sciences › Education › Health Education and Validation
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, autistic adults, primary care, patient-provider communication, barriers to care, self-advocacy, community-based participatory research, cognitive interviewing, test-retest reliability
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Attitude to Health, Autistic Disorder, Communication, Female, Health Services Accessibility, Humans, Interview, Psychological, Male, Middle Aged, Online Systems, Physician-Patient Relations, Primary Health Care, United States, Reproducibility of Results, Caregivers, Patient Satisfaction, Self Efficacy, Community-Based Participatory Research, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review