The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Assessment of the In Vivo Toxicity of Gold Nanoparticles
Open accessAbstract
The environmental impact of nanoparticles is evident; however, their toxicity due to their nanosize is rarely discussed. Gold nanoparticles (GNPs) may serve as a promising model to address the size-dependent biological response to nanoparticles because they show good biocompatibility and their size can be controlled with great precision during their chemical synthesis. Naked GNPs ranging from 3 to 100 nm were injected intraperitoneally into BALB/C mice at a dose of 8 mg/kg/week. GNPs of 3, 5, 50, and 100 nm did not show harmful effects; however, GNPs ranging from 8 to 37 nm induced severe sickness in mice. Mice injected with GNPs in this range showed fatigue, loss of appetite, change of fur color, and weight loss. Starting from day 14, mice in this group exhibited a camel-like back and crooked spine. The majority of mice in these groups died within 21 days. Injection of 5 and 3 nm GNPs, however, did not induce sickness or lethality in mice. Pathological examination of the major organs of the mice in the diseased groups indicated an increase of Kupffer cells in the liver, loss of structural integrity in the lungs, and diffusion of white pulp in the spleen. The pathological abnormality was associated with the presence of gold particles at the diseased sites, which were verified by ex vivo Coherent anti-Stoke Raman scattering microscopy. Modifying the surface of the GNPs by incorporating immunogenic peptides ameliorated their toxicity. This reduction in the toxicity is associated with an increase in the ability to induce antibody response. The toxicity of GNPs may be a fundamental determinant of the environmental toxicity of nanoparticles.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Renal clearance of quantum dots
Soo Choi, H., Liu, W., Misra, P., Tanaka, E., Zimmer, J. P., Itty Ipe, B., Bawendi, M. G., & Frangioni, J. V. (2007) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt1340 · Cited by 4,476
Chemical imaging of tissue in vivo with video-rate coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering microscopy
Evans, C. L., Potma, E. O., Puoris'haag, M., Côté, D., Lin, C. P., & Xie, X. S. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0508282102 · Cited by 957
Cited by
Sharifi, S., Behzadi, S., Laurent, S., Laird Forrest, M., Stroeve, P., & Mahmoudi, M. (2012) · Chem. Soc. Rev. · doi:10.1039/c1cs15188f · Cited by 1,460
Engineered nanoparticles interacting with cells: size matters
Shang, L., Nienhaus, K., & Nienhaus, G. U. (2014) · Journal of Nanobiotechnology · doi:10.1186/1477-3155-12-5 · Cited by 1,316
Gold Nanomaterials at Work in Biomedicine
Yang, X., Yang, M., Pang, B., Vara, M., & Xia, Y. (2015) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00193 · Cited by 1,162
Smart nanocarrier-based drug delivery systems for cancer therapy and toxicity studies: A review
Hossen, S., Hossain, M. K., Basher, M. K., Mia, M. N. H., Rahman, M. T., & Uddin, M. J. (2019) · Journal of Advanced Research · doi:10.1016/j.jare.2018.06.005 · Cited by 998
Soenen, S. J., Rivera-Gil, P., Montenegro, J.-M., Parak, W. J., De Smedt, S. C., & Braeckmans, K. (2011) · Nano Today · doi:10.1016/j.nantod.2011.08.001 · Cited by 699
Metadata
- Authors
- Chen, Y.-S., Hung, Y.-C., Liau, I., & Huang, G. S.
- Venue
- Nanoscale Research Letters
- Published
- 2009-05-08
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 858-864
- ISSN
- 1556-276X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2143856400
- Cited by
- 695
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 13.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Assessment of the In Vivo Toxicity of Gold Nanoparticles. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s11671-009-9334-6
- The paper
- Chen, Y.-S., Hung, Y.-C., Liau, I., & Huang, G. S. (2009). Assessment of the In Vivo Toxicity of Gold Nanoparticles. Nanoscale Research Letters. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11671-009-9334-6
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.