Cited by 22Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum DisordersNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeurological disorders and treatments

Cortical thickness abnormalities in trichotillomania: international multi-site analysis

Open access
Chamberlain, Samuel R., Harries, Michael, Redden, Sarah A., Keuthen, Nancy J., Stein, Dan J., Lochner, Christine, Grant, Jon E.·2018·Brain Imaging and Behavior

Abstract

Trichotillomania is a prevalent but often hidden psychiatric condition, characterized by repetitive hair pulling. The aim of this study was to confirm or refute structural brain abnormalities in trichotillomania by pooling all available global data. De-identified MRI scans were pooled by contacting authors of previous studies. Cortical thickness and sub-cortical volumes were compared between patients and controls. Patients (n = 76) and controls (n = 41) were well-matched in terms of demographic characteristics. Trichotillomania patients showed excess cortical thickness in a cluster maximal at right inferior frontal gyrus, unrelated to symptom severity. No significant sub-cortical volume differences were detected in the regions of interest. Morphometric changes in the right inferior frontal gyrus appear to play a central role in the pathophysiology of trichotillomania, and to be trait in nature. The findings are distinct from other impulsive-compulsive disorders (OCD, ADHD, gambling disorder), which have typically been associated with reduced, rather than increased, cortical thickness. Future work should examine sub-cortical and cerebellar morphology using analytic approaches designed for this purpose, and should also characterize grey matter densities/volumes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11682-017-9746-3

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A recent multi-site international study found that trichotillomania patients showed excess cortical thickness in a cluster maximal at right inferior frontal gyrus.

    “A recent multi-site international study of cortical thickness and sub-cortical volumes (76 people with trichotillomania compared to 41 controls) found that trichotillomania patients showed excess cortical thickness in a cluster maximal at right inferior frontal gyrus and appear to play a central role in the pathophysiology of trichotillomania and to be a trait in nature.[25]”

    From Trichotillomania (hair pulling disorder) (2019) · cites this paper as [25]

  • These cortical thickness findings appear to play a central role in the pathophysiology of trichotillomania and to be a trait in nature.

    “A recent multi-site international study of cortical thickness and sub-cortical volumes (76 people with trichotillomania compared to 41 controls) found that trichotillomania patients showed excess cortical thickness in a cluster maximal at right inferior frontal gyrus and appear to play a central role in the pathophysiology of trichotillomania and to be a trait in nature.[25]”

    From Trichotillomania (hair pulling disorder) (2019) · cites this paper as [25]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chamberlain, S. R., Harries, M., Redden, S. A., Keuthen, N. J., Stein, D. J., Lochner, C., & Grant, J. E.
Affiliations
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • University of Chicago (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • University of Cape Town (ZA)
Corresponding author
Chamberlain, Samuel R.
Venue
Brain Imaging and Behavior
Published
2017-06-29
Volume
12
Issue
3
Pages
823-828
ISSN
  • 1931-7557 (ISSN-L)
  • 1931-7565
OpenAlex
W2730685504
Cited by
22
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1
FWCI
3.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Brain Imaging and Behavior (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (acceptedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Apollo (cc-by)
Funders
Wellcome Trust (110049/Z/15/Z)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurological disorders and treatments
Keywords
trichotillomania, cortical thickness, structural brain abnormalities, inferior frontal gyrus, subcortical volume, hair pulling, brain structure, symptom severity
MeSH terms
Adult, Cerebral Cortex, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Organ Size, Trichotillomania, Internationality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review