Cited by 728Liver Disease Diagnosis and TreatmentLiver Diseases and ImmunityAlcohol Consumption and Health Effects

Ursodeoxycholic acid for treatment of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: results of a randomized trial

Open access
Lindor, Keith D., Kowdley, Kris V., Heathcote, Jenny E., Harrison, Edwyn M., Jorgensen, Roberta, Angulo, Paul, Lymp, James F., Burgart, Lawrence +1 more·2004·Hepatology

Abstract

No effective medical therapy is available for all patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) has been suggested to be of benefit based on open label clinical studies. We randomized 166 patients with liver biopsy-proven NASH to receive between 13 and 15 mg/kg/d of UDCA or placebo for 2 years. End points included changes in liver test results and liver histology at 2 years of therapy. The treatment groups were comparable at entry with regard to age, gender, risk factors for NASH, serum liver biochemistries, and baseline liver histology. A total of 126 patients completed 2 years of therapy. Pre- and posttreatment liver biopsies were available in 107 patients for review at the end of the study. UDCA was well tolerated and body weight was stable during the study duration. Serum liver biochemistries were stable or improved in both the UDCA and placebo-treated groups. Changes in the degree of steatosis, necroinflammation, or fibrosis that occurred with therapy were not significantly different between the UDCA and placebo groups. In conclusion, 2 years of therapy with UDCA at a dose of 13 to 15 mg/kg/d, although safe and well tolerated, is not better than placebo for patients with NASH.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hep.20092

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Despite limitations and methodological differences, there is a strong indication of biochemical efficacy (ALT reduction) and a good safety profile for UDCA, but no proof of histological efficacy.

    “Despite several limitations and methodological differences, there is a strong indication of biochemical effi cacy (ALT reduction) and a good safety pro fi le, but no proof of histological ef fi cacy.”

    From EASL-EASD-EASO Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). (2024) · cites this paper as [373]

    The Discussion says UDCA did not improve liver biochemistries compared with placebo; ALT fell in both groups, so the trial contradicts the claimed strong indication of biochemical efficacy. The Histological Response section supports the absence of demonstrated histological efficacy, and the Adverse Events section reports similar overall adverse-event rates between groups. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • There are three larger, placebo-controlled trials of UDCA in MASH differing in dose, and only two report histological endpoints.

    “There are three larger, placebo-controlled trials of UDCA in MASH differing in the dose of UDCA used 373 -375 and only two of them report histological endpoints.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Neuschwander-Tetri BA, Brunt EM, Bacon BR, Sponseller C, Wehmeier KR. Histological improvement in NASH following reduction in insulin resistance with 48-week treatment with PPAR␥ agonist rosiglitazone [ab- stract]. HEPATOLOGY 2002;36:379A.
  2. Kobak GE, Deutsch G, Dahl R, Devereaux MW, Gumpricht E, Sokol RJ. Fat-laden hepatocytes are more prone to cellular necrosis than apoptosis when exposed to hydrophobic bile acids. Gastroenterology 2002;122:A642.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lindor, K. D., Kowdley, K. V., Heathcote, J. E., Harrison, E. M., Jorgensen, R., Angulo, P., Lymp, J. F., Burgart, L., & Colin, P.
Affiliations
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Toronto Western Hospital (CA)
  • Mayo Clinic in Arizona (US)
Corresponding author
Lindor, Keith D.
Venue
Hepatology
Published
2004-03
Volume
39
Issue
3
Pages
770-778
ISSN
0270-9139 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2139112405
Cited by
727
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 45 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 40 · 2012: 44
FWCI
35.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Hepatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Baylor University
  • Baylor University Medical Center
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver Diseases and Immunity
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
Keywords
ursodeoxycholic acid, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, NASH treatment, liver histopathology, steatosis, necroinflammation, liver fibrosis, liver enzymes, placebo comparison, drug safety and tolerability
MeSH terms
Alanine Transaminase, Aspartate Aminotransferases, Cholagogues and Choleretics, Double-Blind Method, Fatty Liver, Fibrosis, Humans, Liver, Necrosis, Ursodeoxycholic Acid, Disease Progression

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review