Cited by 159Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPersonality Disorders and Psychopathology

The relevance of self‐compassion as an intervention target in mood and anxiety disorders: A narrative review based on an emotion regulation framework

Finlay‐jones, Amy Louise·2017·Clinical Psychologist

Abstract

BackgroundThere is growing interest in self‐compassion as a possible treatment target for individuals with depression and anxiety disorders. Understanding self‐compassion within an emotion regulation (ER) framework of mood and anxiety disorders has the potential to generate insights into the clinical relevance of self‐compassion in the treatment of depression and anxiety. The aim of the current review was to integrate evidence and theory from the self‐compassion, ER, and mood and anxiety disorders literatures to highlight directions for research and inform clinical applications.MethodsA review of the cross‐sectional and experimental quantitative literature pertaining to self‐compassion, ER, and mood and anxiety disorders was undertaken, guided by established models of ER in mood and anxiety disorders. Evidence from clinical and non‐clinical studies was included.ResultsThere is preliminary support for an ER framework of self‐compassion and mood and anxiety disorders: in particular, there is evidence that self‐compassion is linked to factors that represent key mechanisms in ER models of depression and anxiety, including affective experiences, ER capacities, and propensity to deploy specific ER strategies. However, research with clinical populations is limited.ConclusionsAn ER perspective may provide a useful framework for guiding research and clinical work on self‐compassion and mood and anxiety disorders. Further research is required to comprehensively test the relationship be…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/cp.12131

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Finlay‐jones, A. L.
Affiliations
Curtin University (AU)
Corresponding author
Finlay‐jones, Amy Louise
Venue
Clinical Psychologist
Published
2017-07-01
Volume
21
Issue
2
Pages
90-103
ISSN
  • 1328-4207 (ISSN-L)
  • 1742-9552
OpenAlex
W2732924384
Cited by
159
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2
FWCI
1.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Psychologist (publishedVersion)
  • eSpace (Curtin University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
Keywords
self-compassion, emotion regulation, mood disorders, anxiety disorders, depression, compassion-focused interventions, emotional experience, emotion regulation strategies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review