Cited by 51Emotion and Mood RecognitionFace recognition and analysisInfrared Thermography in Medicine

Emotion recognition from thermal infrared images using deep Boltzmann machine

Wang, Shangfei, He, Menghua, Gao, Zhen, He, Shan, Ji, Qiang·2014·Frontiers of Computer Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11704-014-3295-3

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, S., He, M., Gao, Z., He, S., & Ji, Q.
Affiliations
  • University of Science and Technology of China (CN)
  • Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Wang, Shangfei
Venue
Frontiers of Computer Science
Published
2014-03-14
Volume
8
Issue
4
Pages
609-618
ISSN
  • 2095-2228 (ISSN-L)
  • 2095-2236
OpenAlex
W2058996406
Cited by
51
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3
FWCI
1.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Frontiers of Computer Science (publishedVersion)
  • Frontiers of Computer Science
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China
  • Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face recognition and analysis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Infrared Thermography in Medicine
Keywords
emotion recognition, thermal infrared images, deep Boltzmann machine, facial expression recognition, unlabeled data

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review