Cited by 401Emotion and Mood RecognitionSentiment Analysis and Opinion MiningSpeech and Audio Processing

Deep learning for robust feature generation in audiovisual emotion recognition

Kim, Yelin, Lee, Honglak, Provost, Emily Mower·2013·2013 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing

Abstract

Automatic emotion recognition systems predict high-level affective content from low-level human-centered signal cues. These systems have seen great improvements in classification accuracy, due in part to advances in feature selection methods. However, many of these feature selection methods capture only linear relationships between features or alternatively require the use of labeled data. In this paper we focus on deep learning techniques, which can overcome these limitations by explicitly capturing complex non-linear feature interactions in multimodal data. We propose and evaluate a suite of Deep Belief Network models, and demonstrate that these models show improvement in emotion classification performance over baselines that do not employ deep learning. This suggests that the learned high-order non-linear relationships are effective for emotion recognition.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/icassp.2013.6638346

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Kim et al. [7] developed a suite of deep belief network models that showed improvements in emotion classification performance over baselines that do not use deep learning.

    “Kim et al. [7] developed a suite of deep belief net- work models that showed improvements in emotion clas- sification performance over baselines that do not use deep learning.”
  • Kim et al. and others demonstrated that joint feature representations can be learned with DBNs.

    “Kim et al. [159] and others (e.g., [149], [148]) demonstrated how this can be achieved with DBNs.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 39 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kim, Y., Lee, H., & Provost, E. M.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Venue
2013 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2013-05
Pages
3687-3691
ISSN
1520-6149 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2009059481
Cited by
401
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 50 · 2018: 49 · 2017: 47 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 2
FWCI
35.38
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Speech and Audio Processing
Keywords
audio-visual emotion recognition, deep belief network, feature selection, multimodal data, emotion classification, higher-order interactions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review