Cited by 288Emotion and Mood RecognitionSpeech Recognition and SynthesisSpeech and Audio Processing

Deep neural networks for acoustic emotion recognition: Raising the benchmarks

Open access
Stuhlsatz, Andre, Meyer, Christine, Eyben, Florian, Zielke, Thomas, Meier, Gunter, Schuller, Bjorn·2011·2011 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP)

Abstract

Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) denote multilayer artificial neural networks with more than one hidden layer and millions of free parameters. We propose a Generalized Discriminant Analysis (GerDA) based on DNNs to learn discriminative features of low dimension optimized with respect to a fast classification from a large set of acoustic features for emotion recognition. On nine frequently used emotional speech corpora, we compare the performance of GerDA features and their subsequent linear classification with previously reported benchmarks obtained using the same set of acoustic features classified by Support Vector Machines (SVMs). Our results impressively show that low-dimensional GerDA features capture hidden information from the acoustic features leading to a significantly raised unweighted average recall and considerably raised weighted average recall.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/icassp.2011.5947651

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Dimensionality reduction of handcrafted features with DNNs can lead to improvements in accuracy over various databases.

    “Dimensionality reduction of handcrafted features with DNNs can lead to improvements in accuracy over various databases [161].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stuhlsatz, A., Meyer, C., Eyben, F., Zielke, T., Meier, G., & Schuller, B.
Affiliations
  • Hochschule Düsseldorf University of Applied Sciences (DE)
  • Technical University of Munich (DE)
Venue
2011 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2011-05
Pages
5688-5691
ISSN
1520-6149 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2099767163
Cited by
288
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 10
FWCI
21.36
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing (publishedVersion)
  • mediaTUM – the media and publications repository of the Technical University Munich (Technical University Munich) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • OPUS (Augsburg University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech Recognition and Synthesis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Speech and Audio Processing
Keywords
acoustic emotion recognition, deep neural network, generalized discriminant analysis, feature extraction, linear classification, support vector machine, benchmark comparison

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review