Cited by 75Cancer survivorship and carePatient-Provider Communication in HealthcareChildhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life

Survivorship care plan preferences of cancer survivors and health care providers: a systematic review and quality appraisal of the evidence

Klemanski, Dori L., Browning, Kristine K., Kue, Jennifer·2016·Journal of Cancer Survivorship

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this systematic review was to describe and examine the current use of treatment summaries and survivorship care plans (TSs/SCPs) for cancer survivors, as well as to summarize and critically assess relevant literature regarding their preferences and usefulness. There is a knowledge gap regarding the preferences of stakeholders as to what is useful on a treatment summary or survivorship care plan.Methods A systematic review of eligible manuscripts was conducted using preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Relevant studies were identified via PubMed, CINAHL Plus, and the Cochrane Library from 2005 through 2013. Eligible studies were critically appraised with qualitative and quantitative appraisal tools.Results There were 29 studies included in this review; 19 were quantitative. Survivors and primary care physicians preferred a printable format delivered 0 to 6 months posttreatment and highlighting signs and symptoms of recurrence, late, and long-term effects, and recommendations for healthy living. Oncology providers supported the concept of treatment summary and survivorship care plan but reported significant barriers to their provision. No studies incorporated caregiver perspectives of treatment summary and survivorship care plan.Conclusion This systematic review did not reveal conclusive evidence regarding the needs of survivors or providers regarding treatment summaries and survivorship care plans. A lack of rigorous studies contributed to this.Implications for cancer survivors Treatment summaries and survivorship care plans are useful for cancer survivors; however, future rigorous studies should be conducted to identify and prioritize the preferences of survivors regarding these.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11764-015-0452-0

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This review has a broader scope than previous reviews, encompassing several forms of cancer, and includes many more studies of the impact of SCPs on health outcomes and health care delivery than previous reviews.

    “It has a broader scope than previous reviews,36 encompassing several forms of cancer, and includes many more studies of the impact of SCPs on health outcomes and health care delivery than included in previous reviews.37,38”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Klemanski, D. L., Browning, K. K., & Kue, J.
Affiliations
  • The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center – Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute (US)
  • The Ohio State University (US)
Corresponding author
Klemanski, Dori L.
Venue
Journal of Cancer Survivorship
Published
2015-04-25
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
71-86
ISSN
  • 1932-2259 (ISSN-L)
  • 1932-2267
OpenAlex
W2072727489
Cited by
75
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 9 · 2014: 1
FWCI
0.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Cancer Survivorship (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
U.S. National Library of Medicine
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
Keywords
cancer survivorship care plans, treatment summaries, cancer survivors, treatment follow-up, recurrence monitoring, late effects of cancer treatment, barriers to care, primary care physicians
MeSH terms
Attitude of Health Personnel, Consumer Behavior, Female, Health Personnel, Humans, Neoplasms, Patient Care Planning, Quality of Health Care, Survivors, Evidence-Based Practice, Patient Preference, Physicians, Primary Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review