Cited by 85Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsCancer survivorship and careDigital Mental Health Interventions

A user-centred approach to developing bWell, a mobile app for arm and shoulder exercises after breast cancer treatment

Open access
Harder, Helena, Holroyd, Patrick, Burkinshaw, Lynn, Watten, Phil, Zammit, Charles, Harris, Peter R., Good, Anna, Jenkins, Val·2017·Journal of Cancer Survivorship

Abstract

PURPOSE: The study aim was to develop a mobile application (app) supported by user preferences to optimise self-management of arm and shoulder exercises for upper-limb dysfunction (ULD) after breast cancer treatment. METHODS: Focus groups with breast cancer patients were held to identify user needs and requirements. Behaviour change techniques were explored by researchers and discussed during the focus groups. Concepts for content were identified by thematic analysis. A rapid review was conducted to inform the exercise programme. Preliminary testing was carried out to obtain user feedback from breast cancer patients who used the app for 8 weeks post surgery. RESULTS: Breast cancer patients' experiences with ULD and exercise advice and routines varied widely. They identified and prioritised several app features: tailored information, video demonstrations of the exercises, push notifications, and tracking and progress features. An evidence-based programme was developed with a physiotherapist with progressive exercises for passive and active mobilisation, stretching and strengthening. The exercise demonstration videos were filmed with a breast cancer patient. Early user testing demonstrated ease of use, and clear and motivating app content. CONCLUSIONS: bWell, a novel app for arm and shoulder exercises, was developed by breast cancer patients, health care professionals and academics. Further research is warranted to confirm its clinical effectiveness. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Mobile health has great potential to provide patients with information specific to their needs. bWell is a promising way to support breast cancer patients with exercise routines after treatment and may improve future self-management of clinical care.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11764-017-0630-3

Cites

82 of 82 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Eliciting requirements from target groups comprising patients who are vulnerable and clinically complex, such as people with psychosis or dementia, might be challenging.

    “Third, it was mentioned that eliciting requirements from target groups comprising patients who are vulnerable and clinically complex, such as people with psychosis or dementia, might be challenging.”
  • It might not be possible to include all requirements in an eHealth technology because of practical, technical, or financial limitations.

    “Second, it might not be possible to include all requirements in an eHealth technology because of practical, technical, or financial limitations.”
  • A number of groups [38] declared no conflict of interest despite seemingly being founders of their app.

    “a number of groups [38] declared no conflict of interest, despite seemingly being founders of their app.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Harder, H., Holroyd, P., Burkinshaw, L., Watten, P., Zammit, C., Harris, P. R., Good, A., & Jenkins, V.
Affiliations
  • Brighton and Sussex Medical School (GB)
  • University of Sussex (GB)
  • Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust (GB)
Corresponding author
Harder, Helena
Venue
Journal of Cancer Survivorship
Published
2017-07-24
Volume
11
Issue
6
Pages
732-742
ISSN
  • 1932-2259 (ISSN-L)
  • 1932-2267
OpenAlex
W2737326431
Cited by
84
References
82
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1
FWCI
10.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Cancer Survivorship (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Breast Cancer Now (2014MaySP312)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
Keywords
breast cancer, upper limb impairment, mobile health apps, user-centered design, self-management, behaviour change techniques, physiotherapy, cancer survivors, user needs and preferences, push notifications, progress monitoring
MeSH terms
Arm, Breast Neoplasms, Exercise Therapy, Humans, Middle Aged, Shoulder, Telemedicine, Survivors, Physical Therapy Modalities, Mobile Applications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review