Cited by 146Enhanced Recovery After SurgeryCancer survivorship and careFrailty in Older Adults

An international review and meta-analysis of prehabilitation compared to usual care for cancer patients

Open access
Treanor, C., Kyaw, T., Donnelly, M.·2018·Journal of Cancer Survivorship

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of the study is to systematically review and synthesise randomised controlled trials investigating the effectiveness of prehabilitation compared to usual care for newly diagnosed, adult-onset cancer patients. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL and SSCI were searched up to April 2017. Studies were included if disease-related, treatment-related, patient-reported and health service utilisation outcomes were assessed. Two reviewers independently reviewed and appraised the risk of bias of each study. RESULTS: Eighteen studies were included. Interventions comprised one or more of the following components: psychological support, education and exercise. Meta-analyses found that pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) significantly increased odds of continence at 3 months (OR = 3.29, 95% CI = 1.57-6.91), but did not significantly reduce daily pad use at 6 months post-surgery Mean Difference (MD)= ( = - 0.96, 95% CI = - 2.04-0.12) for prostate cancer patients. Although quality of life improved due to PFMT, functional ability or distress did not. Further meta-analyses indicated that pre-surgical exercise significantly reduced length of hospital stay (MD = - 4.18, 95% CI = - 5.43-- 2.93) and significantly lowered odds of post-surgery complications (OR = 0.25, 95% CI = 0.10-0.66) for lung cancer patients. Psychology-based prehabilitation significantly improved mood, physical well-being and immune function for prostate cancer patients and improved fatigue and psychological outcomes and a trend for better quality of life among breast cancer patients. Risk of bias was high for most studies. CONCLUSIONS: Prehabilitation appears to benefit cancer patients. Rigorous trials are needed to investigate the effectiveness of prehabilitation among other cancer sites and other related effects. The cost-effectiveness of prehabilitation remains unanswered. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Providing interventions earlier in the care pathway may lead to better outcomes for patients during survivorship.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11764-017-0645-9

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Silver JK, Baima J. Cancer prehabilitation: an opportunity to de- crease treatment-related morbidity, increase cancer treatment op- tions, and improve physical and psychological health outcomes. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;92:715-27.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Treanor, C., Kyaw, T., & Donnelly, M.
Affiliations
Queen's University Belfast (GB)
Corresponding author
Treanor, C.
Venue
Journal of Cancer Survivorship
Published
2017-09-12
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
64-73
ISSN
  • 1932-2259 (ISSN-L)
  • 1932-2267
OpenAlex
W2754730491
Cited by
146
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6
FWCI
2.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Cancer Survivorship (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Queen's University of Belfast
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Frailty in Older Adults
Keywords
prehabilitation, cancer patients, prostate cancer, breast cancer, lung cancer, pelvic floor muscle training, continence, psychological support, quality of life, fatigue, postoperative complications, length of hospital stay, cancer survivorship
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, Male, Neoplasms, Quality of Life, Survivors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review