Cited by 78Cancer survivorship and careEnhanced Recovery After SurgeryCancer, Stress, Anesthesia, and Immune Response

Psychological Interventions Prior to Cancer Surgery: a Review of Reviews

Open access
Grimmett, Chloe, Heneka, Nicole, Chambers, Suzanne·2022·Current Anesthesiology Reports

Abstract

Purpose of Review: Patients with cancer who have high levels of psychological distress have poor treatment compliance and worse outcomes. This “review of reviews” provides a narrative synthesis of the impact of psychological prehabilitation interventions on individuals awaiting cancer surgery. Recent Findings: Twenty reviews of prehabilitation with psychological interventions were identified. There is a trend towards improved psychological outcomes following intervention, particularly when psychologist-led. However, there was considerable heterogeneity within interventions, outcome measures, and timing of assessment precluding numeric synthesis. Methodological limitations including non-blinding, absence of stratification, and underpowered studies were also pervasive. Summary: Providing psychological support early in the cancer pathway and prior to surgery has the potential to improve psychological health and outcomes. The application of existing knowledge in psycho-oncology, including distress screening, is needed in the prehabilitation setting. Consistent outcome assessments, accurate reporting of intervention components and delivery methods, and a consideration of effective systems and economical implementation strategies would facilitate advancements in this field.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s40140-021-00505-x

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Providing psychological support before surgery helps patients cope with surgery and has positive outcomes.

    “Providing psychological support before surgery helps the patients to cope with the surgery and has positive outcomes.”

    From Coping in Post-Mastectomy Breast Cancer Survivors and Need for Intervention: Systematic Review. (2023) · cites this paper as [35]

    The Results (Unimodal Psychological Prehabilitation Interventions) report improvements in some psychological outcomes from preoperative interventions that include coping strategies, but say the interventions did not affect surgical outcomes and caution that the evidence has methodological limitations. The Conclusions describe improved psychological health and treatment outcomes as a potential benefit, so the claim states the benefit more definitively than the review does. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [34]Macmillan Cancer Support. Prehabilitation evidence and insight review 2017. Available from: https://www.macmillan.org.uk/_images/prehabilitation-evidence-and-insight-review_tcm9-335025.pdf.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Grimmett, C., Heneka, N., & Chambers, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Southampton (GB)
  • University of Technology Sydney (AU)
  • Australian Catholic University (AU)
Corresponding author
Grimmett, Chloe
Venue
Current Anesthesiology Reports
Published
2022-01-31
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
78-87
ISSN
  • 1523-3855 (ISSN-L)
  • 2167-6275
OpenAlex
W4210467347
Cited by
78
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 7
FWCI
1.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current anesthesiology reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (acceptedVersion)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Cancer, Stress, Anesthesia, and Immune Response
Keywords
cancer surgery, psychological distress, psycho-oncology, distress screening, medication adherence, psychological outcomes, cancer patients

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review