Cited by 91Cancer survivorship and careMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsChildhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life

Acceptance and commitment therapy in adult cancer survivors: a systematic review and conceptual model

Open access
Mathew, Asha, Doorenbos, Ardith Z., Jang, Min Kyeong, Hershberger, Patricia E.·2021·Journal of Cancer Survivorship

Abstract

Purpose: People with cancer experience significant physical and psychological symptoms, during as well as after primary treatment. Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT), a psychological intervention, reduces both types of symptoms among individuals with chronic pain and emotional distress. Due to the unique challenges of cancer survivorship, this systematic review critically evaluates and synthesizes the literature on the context, mechanisms, and effect of ACT among adult cancer survivors. Methods: Articles were retrieved from the CINAHL, MEDLINE via Ovid, Web of Science, PsycInfo, Scopus, Embase, Google Scholar, and Cochrane databases. Selected grey literature portals, clinical trial registries, and conference proceedings were also searched. The NIH tools were used to assess study quality and the revised Cochrane Risk-of-Bias tool to assess risk of bias Results: Thirteen articles, reporting on 537 cancer survivors with various cancer types, were included. ACT significantly reduced anxiety, depression, and fear of cancer recurrence and improved psychological flexibility and quality of life. Outcomes such as pain and insomnia were understudied. Lack of participant blinding and non-random assignment were the most common methodological issues. A conceptual model is proposed that describes the possible influencing factors of an ACT-based intervention in cancer survivors. Conclusion: Review findings suggest that ACT is an effective intervention to improve some of the common concerns among cancer survivors. While all the studies in the review were recent (published 2015–2019), they examined only a limited number of outcomes. Hence, more methodologically rigorous studies which examine the effect of ACT on other troubling symptoms among cancer survivors are warranted. Implications for Cancer Survivors: Incorporating ACT into comprehensive post-treatment survivorship care can enhance psychological flexibility and reduce anxiety, depression, and fear. © 2020, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11764-020-00938-z

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

10 of 27 cited sources checked · 6 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Method

    The authors defined cancer survivor for this review as an individual who has received a cancer diagnosis and completed primary treatment excluding maintenance treatment.

    “For the purpose of this review, cancer survivor is defined as an individual who has received a cancer diagnosis and completed their primary treatment (excluding maintenance treatment) [27].”
    Quote in the paperNot yet classified1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [27] Moser EC, Meunier F. Cancer survivorship: a positive side effect of more successful cancer treatment. EJC Suppl. 2014;12(1):1–4. source
  • Background

    The six core therapeutic processes of ACT are acceptance, cognitive defusion, contact with present moment, self-as-context, values, and committed action.

    “Specifically, the six core therapeutic processes of ACT are acceptance, cognitive defusion, contact with present moment, self-as-context, values, and committed action.”
    Quote in the paperNot yet classified3 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [18] Hayes SC, Hofmann SG. The third wave of cognitive behavioral therapy and the rise of process-based care. World Psychiatry. 2017;16(3):245–6. source

      The Abstract identifies acceptance, cognitive defusion, and values as concepts central to third-wave interventions and names ACT among those interventions. It does not identify six core ACT processes or list contact with the present moment, self-as-context, and committed action as such. (LLM, conf=0.80)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [19] Hayes SC, Luoma JB, Bond FW, Masuda A, Lillis J. Acceptance and commitment therapy: Model, processes and outcomes. Behav Res Ther. 2006;44(1):1–25. source
    • cites [20] Hayes SC, Levin ME, Vilardaga JP, Villatte JL, Pistorello J. Acceptance and commitment therapy and contextual behavioral science: examining the progress of a distinctive model of behavioral and cognitive therapy. Behav Ther. 2013;44(2):180–98. source
  • Finding

    Strong evidence of feasibility and acceptability was reported, with high accrual and retention or enrollment rates and high satisfaction with the sessions.

    “Strong evidence of feasibility and acceptability was reported, with high accrual and retention or enrollment rates [44, 45], high ratings for essentialness and effectiveness of the intervention [47], moderate to high ratings for usefulness or expected benefits from the intervention [48, 52, 54], and high degree of satisfaction with the sessions [45, 46, 48, 51] (see Table 4 for details).”
    Quote in the paperNot yet classified2 of 6 sources checked
    • cites [44] Johns SA, Stutz PV, Talib TL, Cohee AA, Beck-Coon KA, Brown LF, et al. Acceptance and commitment therapy for breast cancer survivors with fear of cancer recurrence: A 3-arm pilot randomized controlled trial. Cancer. 2020;126(1):211–8. source

      The Discussion reports strong evidence of feasibility, citing high accrual and retention, and Results > Feasibility gives the corresponding rates. Our copy does not report participant satisfaction with the sessions, so that part of the attributed claim is unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [45] Kinner EM, Armer JS, McGregor BA, Duffecy J, Leighton S, Corden ME, et al. Internet-based group intervention for ovarian cancer survivors: Feasibility and preliminary results. JMIR Cancer. 2018;4(1):e1. source

      The Results (Acceptability) report high session satisfaction, averaging 9.0 out of 10. But the Results (Feasibility) report 32% enrollment and 68% retention, and the Discussion (Limitations) explicitly identifies both rates as limitations. The source therefore supports high satisfaction, not the characterization of its enrollment and retention rates as high. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [47] Smith A, Thewes B, Turner J, Gilchrist J, Fardell J, Sharpe L, et al. Pilot of a theoretically grounded psychologist-delivered intervention for fear of cancer recurrence (conquer fear). Psychooncology. 2015;24(8):967–70. source
    • cites [48] Butow PN, Turner J, Gilchrist J, Sharpe L, Smith AB, Fardell JE, et al. Randomized Trial of ConquerFear: A Novel, Theoretically based psychosocial intervention for fear of cancer recurrence. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(36):4066–77. source
    • cites [52] Kangas M, McDonald S, Williams JR, Smee RI. Acceptance and commitment therapy program for distressed adults with a primary brain tumor: A case series study. Support Care Cancer. 2015;23(10):2855–9. source
    • cites [54] Montesinos F, Luciano C. Acceptance of relapse fears in breast cancer patients: effects of an ACT-based abridged intervention. Psicooncologia. 2016;13(1):7–21.

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Finding

    Quality of life significantly improved following ACT-based interventions.

    “Studies reported significant improvement in QoL following the ACT-based interventions, post-intervention [44, 45, 48], and at follow-up periods of 1 and 6 months [44].”
    Quote in the paperNot yet classified2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [44] Johns SA, Stutz PV, Talib TL, Cohee AA, Beck-Coon KA, Brown LF, et al. Acceptance and commitment therapy for breast cancer survivors with fear of cancer recurrence: A 3-arm pilot randomized controlled trial. Cancer. 2020;126(1):211–8. source
    • cites [45] Kinner EM, Armer JS, McGregor BA, Duffecy J, Leighton S, Corden ME, et al. Internet-based group intervention for ovarian cancer survivors: Feasibility and preliminary results. JMIR Cancer. 2018;4(1):e1. source

      The Results (Preliminary Outcomes) report a statistically significant postintervention improvement in ovarian cancer-specific quality of life (P=.01), but the increase in total quality of life was not statistically significant (P=.08). Methods (Field Trial Testing) describes the intervention as adapted from cognitive-behavioral stress management, with ACT-based exercises incorporated, rather than as an ACT-based intervention alone. This citation supports the postintervention finding, not the follow-up periods attributed to another citation. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [48] Butow PN, Turner J, Gilchrist J, Sharpe L, Smith AB, Fardell JE, et al. Randomized Trial of ConquerFear: A Novel, Theoretically based psychosocial intervention for fear of cancer recurrence. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(36):4066–77. source
  • Finding

    Most studies used ACT processes exclusively, while others used ACT as a hybrid therapy with CBT, relaxation, metacognitive therapy, or other models.

    “ACT processes were used exclusively in about 64% of the studies [44, 46, 52–55] (unpublished thesis). The other studies used ACT as a hybrid therapy, where the intervention involved both ACT and other therapies, such as CBT and relaxation [51], metacognitive therapy [47, 48, 51], cognitive-behavioral stress management and mindfulness-based stress reduction [45], and processes of the Common-Sense Model of illness and the Self-Regulatory Executive Function model [47, 48].”
    Quote in the paperNot yet classified2 of 9 sources checked
    • cites [44] Johns SA, Stutz PV, Talib TL, Cohee AA, Beck-Coon KA, Brown LF, et al. Acceptance and commitment therapy for breast cancer survivors with fear of cancer recurrence: A 3-arm pilot randomized controlled trial. Cancer. 2020;126(1):211–8. source
    • cites [46] Arch JJ, Mitchell JL. An acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) group intervention for cancer survivors experiencing anxiety at re-entry. Psychooncology. 2016;25(5):610–5. source
    • cites [52] Kangas M, McDonald S, Williams JR, Smee RI. Acceptance and commitment therapy program for distressed adults with a primary brain tumor: A case series study. Support Care Cancer. 2015;23(10):2855–9. source
    • cites [53] Gonzalez-Fernandez S, Fernandez-Rodriguez C, Paz-Caballero MD, Perez-Alvarez M. Treating anxiety and depression of cancer survivors: Behavioral activation versus acceptance and commitment therapy. Psicothema. 2018;30(1):14–20. source
    • cites [54] Montesinos F, Luciano C. Acceptance of relapse fears in breast cancer patients: effects of an ACT-based abridged intervention. Psicooncologia. 2016;13(1):7–21.

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [55] Mohabbat-Bahar S, Maleki-Rizi F, Akbari ME, Moradi-Joo M. Effectiveness of group training based on acceptance and commitment therapy on anxiety and depression of women with breast cancer. Iran J Cancer Prev. 2015;8(2):71–6.
    • cites [51] Heiniger LE, Smith AB, Olver I, Grimison P, Klein B, Wootten A, et al. E-TC: Development and pilot testing of a web-based intervention to reduce anxiety and depression in survivors of testicular cancer. Eur J Cancer Care. 2017;26(6):e12698. source
    • cites [47] Smith A, Thewes B, Turner J, Gilchrist J, Fardell J, Sharpe L, et al. Pilot of a theoretically grounded psychologist-delivered intervention for fear of cancer recurrence (conquer fear). Psychooncology. 2015;24(8):967–70. source
    • cites [48] Butow PN, Turner J, Gilchrist J, Sharpe L, Smith AB, Fardell JE, et al. Randomized Trial of ConquerFear: A Novel, Theoretically based psychosocial intervention for fear of cancer recurrence. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(36):4066–77. source

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The majority of survivorship intervention research has involved face-to-face sessions delivered by clinical psychologists, psychiatrists, and social workers in clinic- or hospital-based settings, supplemented with intervention booster sessions via phone or internet.

    “The majority of survivorship intervention research has involved face-to-face sessions delivered by clinical psychologists, psychiatrists, and social workers in clinic- or hospital-based settings, supplemented with intervention booster sessions via phone or internet [9, 12].”

    From A digital, coach-assisted intervention to address the psychosocial needs of young adult cancer survivors: Randomized controlled trial protocol and intervention adaptation process (2024) · cites this paper as [9]

    The Results > Intervention characteristics section reports that 72.7% of the reviewed ACT interventions were delivered in hospitals or clinics and that, among the seven studies reporting therapist information, about 86% used clinical psychologists, psychiatrists, or oncology social workers. It does not establish that the sessions were predominantly face-to-face or that phone or internet booster sessions supplemented them. Its findings also concern ACT interventions in adult cancer survivors, not survivorship intervention research generally; page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • There is limited use of scalable approaches, like digital health and health coaching, in interventions for YA survivors.

    “limited use of scalable approaches, like digital health [9, 12, 46] and health coaching [48]”

    From A digital, coach-assisted intervention to address the psychosocial needs of young adult cancer survivors: Randomized controlled trial protocol and intervention adaptation process (2024) · cites this paper as [9]

    The Results section on intervention delivery reports that most reviewed ACT interventions for adult cancer survivors took place in hospitals or clinics, while only two studies used web-based delivery. That supports limited digital delivery within this review, but the paper does not establish the claim specifically for young adult (YA) survivors or for survivor interventions generally. The citing sentence assigns health coaching to a separate citation [48]. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Another systematic review showed moderate to high effect-sizes of ACT on FCR, while CBT had low to moderate effect-sizes.

    “Another systematic review showed moderate to high effect-sizes of ACT on FCR, while CBT had low to moderate effect-sizes.13,14”

    From A randomized clinical trial: Efficacy of group-based acceptance and commitment therapy program for breast cancer patients with high fear of progression (2024) · cites this paper as [13]

    The Results section (‘Fear of cancer recurrence’; page unavailable) reports significant reductions in FCR following ACT-based interventions. It does not characterize ACT’s FCR effect sizes as moderate to high or report low-to-moderate CBT effect sizes; the Discussion notes that only six included studies reported effect sizes. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Two meta-analytic studies found ACT beneficial for reducing anxiety and improving QOL in cancer patients.

    “Additionally, two meta-analytic studies found ACT beneficial for reducing anxiety and improving QOL in cancer patients.13,15”

    From A randomized clinical trial: Efficacy of group-based acceptance and commitment therapy program for breast cancer patients with high fear of progression (2024) · cites this paper as [13]

    The Results report reduced anxiety and improved quality of life after ACT-based interventions in adult cancer survivors. However, the Methods (Data extraction and synthesis; page unavailable) say this paper used a narrative, descriptive synthesis because the studies were heterogeneous—not a meta-analysis. This source also cannot establish what the other cited study found. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • A systematic review has shown moderate to high effect sizes of ACT on FCR among breast cancer survivors.

    “A systematic review has shown moderate to high effect sizes of ACT on FCR among breast cancer survivors.13”

    From A randomized clinical trial: Efficacy of group-based acceptance and commitment therapy program for breast cancer patients with high fear of progression (2024) · cites this paper as [13]

    The Results (Effect of intervention on outcomes; page unavailable) report significant reductions in fear of cancer recurrence after ACT, and the Study and participant characteristics section includes breast-cancer-only studies. However, the retrieved passages do not establish moderate to high effect sizes for FCR among breast cancer survivors; the Discussion notes that only six studies reported effect sizes at all. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 69 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Montesinos F, Luciano C. Acceptance of relapse fears in breast cancer patients: effects of an ACT-based abridged intervention. Psicooncologia. 2016;13(1):7–21.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mathew, A., Doorenbos, A. Z., Jang, M. K., & Hershberger, P. E.
Affiliations
  • Christian Medical College, Vellore (IN)
  • University of Illinois Chicago (US)
Corresponding author
Mathew, Asha
Venue
Journal of Cancer Survivorship
Published
2020-09-19
Volume
15
Issue
3
Pages
427-451
ISSN
  • 1932-2259 (ISSN-L)
  • 1932-2267
OpenAlex
W3087709441
Cited by
91
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 7
FWCI
0.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Cancer Survivorship (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
NINR,NIH (K24NR015340)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
Keywords
acceptance and commitment therapy, cancer survivors, psychological flexibility, anxiety, depression, fear of cancer recurrence, quality of life, survivorship care, psychological distress, conceptual model
MeSH terms
Cancer Survivors, Psychological Distress, Adult, Anxiety, Humans, Neoplasms, Quality of Life, Acceptance and Commitment Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read (extract-v1) on 2026-09-24.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review