Cited by 32Student Assessment and FeedbackMathematics Education and Teaching TechniquesEducational and Psychological Assessments

Formative assessment in mathematics education: a systematic review

Open access
Maskos, Karolin, Schulz, Andreas, Oeksuez, Selin S., Rakoczy, Katrin·2025·ZDM – Mathematics Education

Abstract

Formative assessment (FA) is a crucial factor influencing learning in schools. However, definitions of FA vary, and findings regarding the effectiveness of FA in mathematics education, specifically, are fragmentary. In this systematic review, we defined five FA components and integrated them into an overarching model. We identified 45 studies spanning the period 2015–2023 that investigated FA’s impact on cognitive and noncognitive learning in mathematics and yielded mixed results. Notably, computer-based assessments in interactive learning environments revealed particular promise. An analysis of the variations in study designs and characteristics provided insight into the factors that could contribute to the effectiveness of FA in progressing and promoting student learning, such as regular implementation over three months, content-specific learning intentions and measurement instruments, and randomized designs. An analysis of the reported moderator and mediator variables facilitated a more nuanced understanding of the effects of FA, highlighting its potential to support lower- to medium-performing students and those from lower socioeconomic backgrounds, thus potentially contributing to educational equity. Based on our results, we recommend that future research should prioritize well-defined studies that investigate and describe FA in detail to comprehensively evaluate its potential in supporting mathematical education.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11858-025-01696-x

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies on preservice teachers' beliefs, assessment preferences, and formative assessment in mathematics education suggest that conventional grading practices often fail to capture subtle but meaningful differences in learning and professional growth.

    “Studies on preservice teachers' beliefs, assessment preferences, and formative assessment in mathematics education suggest that conventional grading practices often fail to capture subtle but meaningful differences in learning and professional growth”
  • Recent research on formative and diagnostic assessment in mathematics education highlights the importance of tools that capture incremental growth and guide targeted instructional support.

    “This finding aligns with recent research on formative and diagnostic assessment in mathematics education, which highlights the importance of tools that capture incremental growth and guide targeted instructional support (Maskos et al., 2025; Ruiz-Primo, 2021).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Maskos, K., Schulz, A., Oeksuez, S. S., & Rakoczy, K.
Affiliations
  • Zurich University of Teacher Education (CH)
  • University of Teacher Education Lucerne (CH)
  • Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen (DE)
Corresponding author
Schulz, Andreas
Venue
ZDM – Mathematics Education
Published
2025-05-20
Volume
57
Issue
4
Pages
679-693
ISSN
  • 1615-679X (ISSN-L)
  • 1863-9690
  • 1863-9704
OpenAlex
W4410512325
Cited by
32
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 2
FWCI
11.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
ZDM (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Zurich University of Teacher Education
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
  • Social Sciences › Education › Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational and Psychological Assessments
Keywords
formative assessment, mathematics education, assessment effectiveness, computer-based testing, interactive learning environment, academic performance, educational equity, underachieving students, socioeconomic background, assessment frequency, learning intentions, measurement instruments

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review