Cited by 195Student Assessment and FeedbackMathematics Education and Teaching TechniquesEvaluation of Teaching Practices

The impact of formative assessment on student achievement: A study of the effects of changes to classroom practice after a comprehensive professional development programme

Andersson, Catarina, Palm, Torulf·2017·Learning and Instruction

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.12.006

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 49 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Andersson, C., & Palm, T.
Affiliations
Umeå University (SE)
Corresponding author
Palm, Torulf
Venue
Learning and Instruction
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-06
Volume
49
Pages
92-102
ISSN
0959-4752 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W363090881
Cited by
195
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 4
FWCI
45.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Learning and Instruction (publishedVersion)
Funders
Swedish Riksbankens Jubileumsfond
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
  • Social Sciences › Education › Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Education › Evaluation of Teaching Practices
Keywords
formative assessment, teacher professional development, academic performance, mathematics education, teaching practice, intervention effects, primary school teachers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review