Cited by 112Sleep and related disordersFunctional Brain Connectivity StudiesSleep and Wakefulness Research

Insomnia Disorder and Brain’s Default-Mode Network

Marques, Daniel Ruivo, Gomes, Ana Allen, Caetano, Gina, Castelo-Branco, Miguel·2018·Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports

Abstract

Purpose of review Insomnia disorder (ID) is a prevalent sleep disorder that significantly compromises the physical and mental health of individuals. This article reviews novel approaches in the study of brain networks and impaired function in ID through the application of modern neuroimaging techniques such as functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Recent findings The default-mode network (DMN) is presumed to be correlated with self-referential information processing, and it appears to be altered or unbalanced in insomnia. A growing body of evidence suggests the lack of deactivation of brain regions comprising the DMN when insomnia patients are at rest. Moreover, core areas of the DMN demonstrate greater activation in insomnia patients when compared to healthy controls in self-referential related tasks. Despite the few studies on the topic, underpinning the correlation between abnormal DMN activity and ID deserves further attention in the future. Implications for therapeutics are briefly outlined.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11910-018-0861-3

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cortisol elevation relates positively to the degree of objective sleep disturbance, consistent with a disorder of 24-hour hyperarousal rather than simply sleep loss.

    “Notably, this elevation relates positively to the degree of objective sleep disturbance, consistent with a disorder of 24-hour hyperarousal rather than simply sleep loss [25].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Marques, D. R., Gomes, A. A., Caetano, G., & Castelo-Branco, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Aveiro (PT)
  • University of Coimbra (PT)
  • University of Lisbon (PT)
Corresponding author
Marques, Daniel Ruivo
Venue
Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports
Published
2018-06-09
Volume
18
Issue
8
Pages
45-45
ISSN
  • 1528-4042 (ISSN-L)
  • 1534-6293
OpenAlex
W2807404538
Cited by
112
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2
FWCI
0.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
Keywords
insomnia, default mode network, self-referential processing, functional MRI, sleep disorders, brain network dysfunction
MeSH terms
Adult, Brain, Brain Mapping, Cognition, Female, Humans, Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Nerve Net, Neural Pathways

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review