Cited by 22Sleep and related disordersFunctional Brain Connectivity StudiesSleep and Wakefulness Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Functional connectivity of the default mode network predicts subsequent polysomnographically measured sleep in people with symptoms of insomnia

Open access

Abstract

Insomnia is often accompanied by excessive pre-sleep rumination. Such ruminative thinking is also associated with increased connectivity of the default mode network (DMN). It is likely that DMN connectivity and associated rumination contribute to the pathogenesis of insomnia. We hypothesized that resting state functional connectivity (rsFC) between the DMN and other brain regions prior to bedtime would predict objectively measured sleep among individuals with insomnia. Twenty participants (12 female; M age = 26.9, SD = 6.6 years) with symptoms of insomnia underwent an rsFC scan in the early evening followed by a night of polysomographically (PSG) measured sleep. Connectivity of the DMN with other brain regions was regressed against several PSG sleep metrics, including time in wake, N1, N2, N3, REM, total sleep time (TST), and sleep efficiency (SE) at a cluster corrected false discovery rate (FDR) correction P< 0.05. The connectivity between DMN and cortical regions was negatively correlated with PSG indices of poorer sleep including time in wake (right angular gyrus) and N1 (precuneus) but positively correlated with time in REM (orbitofrontal cortex), TST (insula, orbitofrontal cortex, superior frontal gyrus, paracingulate gyrus), SE (orbitofrontal cortex). Connectivity between DMN and the pons was negatively correlated with SE. Among individuals with symptoms of insomnia, better sleep was predicted by rsFC between the DMN and cortical regions involved in executive functioning, consciousness, and complex cognition. Findings raise the possibility that future interventions aimed at suppressing pre-sleep DMN activation may weaken synergy between pre-sleep ruminative worry and complex cognitions, potentially ameliorating problems falling asleep.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/wnr.0000000000001949

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Elevated levels of corticotropin-releasing hormone and copeptin are demonstrated in individuals with chronic insomnia, reflecting hypothalamic activation and sympathetic nerve excitation.

    “Recent evidence also demonstrates elevated levels of corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) and copeptin (a marker of arginine vasopressin activity) in individuals with chronic insomnia, reflecting both hypothalamic activation and sympathetic nerve excitation [26].”

    From Pre-Sleep Anxiety: Mechanisms and Therapeutic Approaches in Clinical Practice. (2026) · cites this paper as [26]

    The Introduction discusses pre-sleep cognitive hyperarousal and default mode network activity, while the Methods describe brain scans and sleep measurements in people with insomnia symptoms. Searches for corticotropin-releasing hormone, copeptin, hypothalamic activation, and sympathetic nerve excitation found no passage addressing the claimed biomarker elevations; the copy is not marked as truncated. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Killgore, W. D. S., Jankowski, S., Henderson-Arredondo, K., Lucas, D. A., Patel, S. I., Hildebrand, L. L., Huskey, A., & Dailey, N. S.
Affiliations
University of Arizona (US)
Corresponding author
Killgore, William D.S.
Venue
NeuroReport
Published
2023-08-18
Volume
34
Issue
14
Pages
734-740
ISSN
0959-4965 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4386047057
Cited by
22
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2
FWCI
5.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuroreport (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
U.S. Army Medical Research Acquisition Activity
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
Keywords
insomnia, default mode network, resting-state functional connectivity, sleep efficiency, sleep architecture, REM sleep, total sleep time, passive optical networks, orbitofrontal cortex, precuneus, angular gyrus
MeSH terms
Default Mode Network, Adult, Female, Humans, Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders, Male, Sleep, Wakefulness, Polysomnography, Young Adult, Connectome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review