Cited by 22Migraine and Headache StudiesMedication Adherence and ComplianceMobile Health and mHealth Applications

Adherence to Behavioral Therapy for Migraine: Knowledge to Date, Mechanisms for Assessing Adherence, and Methods for Improving Adherence

Open access
Gewirtz, Alexandra, Minen, Mia·2019·Current Pain and Headache Reports

Abstract

Purpose of review In other disease states, adherence to behavioral therapies has gained attention, with a greater amount of studies discussing, defining, and optimizing adherence. For example, a meta-analysis formally discussed adherence in 25 studies of CBT for 11 different disorders, with only 6 of the 25 omitting addressing or defining adherence. Many studies have discussed the use of text messages, graph-based adherence rates, and email/telephone reminders to improve adherence. This paper examined the available literature regarding adherence to behavioral therapy for migraine as well as adherence to similar therapies in other disease states. The goal of this research is to apply lessons learned from adherence to behavioral therapy for other diseases in better understanding how we can improve adherence to behavioral therapy for migraine.Recent findings Treatment for migraine typically includes both pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic therapies, including progressive muscle relaxation (PMR), cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), and biofeedback. Behavioral therapies have been shown to significantly reduce headache frequency and intensity, but high attrition rates and suboptimal adherence can undermine their efficacy. Traditionally, adherence to behavioral therapy has been defined by self-report, including paper headache diaries and assignments. In person attendance has also been employed as a method of defining and monitoring adherence. With the advent of personal electronics, measurements of adherence have shifted to include electronic-based methods such as computer-based programs and mobile-based therapies. Furthermore, some studies have taken advantage of electronic methods such as email reminders, push notifications, and other mobile-based reminders to optimize adherence. The JITA-I, a novel method of engaging individual patient adherence, has also been suggested as a possible method to improve adherence by tailoring engagement with a mobile health app-based on patient input. These novel methods may be utilized in behavioral therapy for migraine for further optimizing adherence. Few intervention studies to date have addressed the optimal ways to impact adherence to migraine behavioral therapy. Further research is required regarding adherence with behavioral therapies, specifically via mobile health interventions to better understand how to define and improve adherence via this novel forum. Once we are able to understand optimal methods of tracking adherence, we will be better equipped to understand the role of adherence in shaping outcomes for behavioral therapy in migraine.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11916-019-0739-3

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In behavioral headache treatment, engagement has yet to be thoroughly assessed in terms of dose and duration; however, earlier studies reported high dropout rates.

    “In behavioral headache treatment, engagement has yet to be thoroughly assessed in terms of dose and duration; however, earlier studies reported high dropout rates [124].”
  • Several studies found that psychological therapies delivered by telephone were as effective as face-to-face treatment, had comparable therapeutic alliance, and satisfied participants.

    “Several studies have demonstrated that psychological therapies delivered by telephone were as effective as face-to-face treatment,37 therapeutic alliance was comparable, and participants were satisfied with this model of delivery. 38”

    From A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial to Assess the Impact of Motivational Interviewing on Initiating Behavioral Therapy for Migraine (2020) · cites this paper as [38]

    The sections on tracking behavioral-therapy adherence and adherence in other disease states (pages unavailable) discuss internet-based treatment and mobile tools, but do not report telephone therapy being as effective as face-to-face treatment. Searches for telephone delivery, therapeutic alliance, and participant satisfaction found no passage addressing those comparisons. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 53 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gewirtz, A., & Minen, M.
Affiliations
NYU Langone Health (US)
Corresponding author
Minen, Mia
Venue
Current Pain and Headache Reports
Published
2019-01
Volume
23
Issue
1
Pages
3-3
ISSN
  • 1531-3433 (ISSN-L)
  • 1534-3081
OpenAlex
W2909622205
Cited by
22
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2
FWCI
0.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Pain and Headache Reports (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (K23AT009706)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Migraine and Headache Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Keywords
migraine, behavior therapy, medication adherence, cognitive behavioral therapy, biofeedback, progressive muscle relaxation, mobile health, adherence monitoring, email reminders, push notifications, patient engagement, headache frequency
MeSH terms
Wearable Electronic Devices, Feasibility Studies, Humans, Migraine Disorders, Patient Compliance, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Internet, Computers, Handheld

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review