Cited by 67Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesPharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes

Withdrawing Benzodiazepines in Patients With Anxiety Disorders

Lader, Malcolm, Kyriacou, Andri·2016·Current Psychiatry Reports

Abstract

The large class of CNS-depressant medications-the benzodiazepines-have been extensively used for over 50 years, anxiety disorders being one of the main indications. A substantial proportion (perhaps up to 20-30 %) of long-term users becomes physically dependent on them. Problems with their use became manifest, and dependence, withdrawal difficulties and abuse were documented by the 1980s. Many such users experience physical and psychological withdrawal symptoms on attempted cessation and may develop clinically troublesome syndromes even during slow tapering. Few studies have been conducted to establish the optimal withdrawal schedules. The usual management comprises slow withdrawal over weeks or months together with psychotherapy of various modalities. Pharmacological aids include antidepressants such as the SSRIs especially if depressive symptoms supervene. Other pharmacological agents such as the benzodiazepine antagonist, flumazenil, and the hormonal agent, melatonin, remain largely experimental. The purpose of this review is to analyse the evidence for the efficacy of the usual withdrawal regimes and the newer agents. It is concluded that little evidence exists outside the usual principles of drug withdrawal but there are some promising leads.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11920-015-0642-5

Cites

80 of 80 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

2 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lader, M., & Kyriacou, A.
Affiliations
King's College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Lader, Malcolm
Venue
Current Psychiatry Reports
Published
2016-01
Volume
18
Issue
1
Pages
8-8
ISSN
  • 1523-3812 (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-1645
OpenAlex
W2227785996
Cited by
67
References
80
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4
FWCI
0.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Psychiatry Reports (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Keywords
benzodiazepine withdrawal, benzodiazepine dependence, anxiety disorders, benzodiazepine tapering, withdrawal symptoms, flumazenil, melatonin, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, antidepressants, psychotherapy, central nervous system depressants
MeSH terms
Long Term Adverse Effects, Anxiety Disorders, Benzodiazepines, Humans, Psychotherapy, Substance Withdrawal Syndrome, Substance-Related Disorders, Withholding Treatment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review