Cited by 59Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchChild Abuse and TraumaMigration, Health and Trauma

Continuous Traumatic Stress and the Life Cycle: Exposure to Repeated Political Violence in Israel

Pat-Horenczyk, Ruth, Schiff, Miriam·2019·Current Psychiatry Reports

Abstract

Purpose of review Millions of individuals and families live under continual exposure to threat such as protracted socio-political conflict or community violence facing current and future danger. The construct of continuous traumatic stress (CTS) was suggested as a supplement perspective for the understanding of the specific impact of living under both current and realistic future threat. Yet, the unique parameters, utility, and validity of the construct CTS are underexplored.Recent findings Currently, CTS describes both the exposure and the unique clinical conglomerate of distress. In this paper, we first elaborate on the rationale for the construct of CTS. Then, we present evidence on the consequences of exposure to CTS in the Israeli context of continual ongoing and prolonged political violence. Research on CTS is presented across the life cycle with an emphasis on risk and protective factors from a developmental perspective. We conclude with implications for research, assessment, and interventions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11920-019-1060-x

Cites

77 of 77 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Individuals living in chronic situations seem to be mainly concerned with the future, that is, with anticipated future danger and threat, and their thinking is dominated by fantasies of what might happen and ways of avoiding it.

    “Individuals living in such chronic situations seem to be mainly concerned with the future, that is, with anticipated future danger and threat, and their thinking is dominated by fantasies of what might happen and ways of avoiding it [54,55].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pat-Horenczyk, R., & Schiff, M.
Affiliations
Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
Venue
Current Psychiatry Reports
Published
2019-07-01
Volume
21
Issue
8
Pages
71-71
ISSN
  • 1523-3812 (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-1645
OpenAlex
W2954479616
Cited by
59
References
77
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5
FWCI
0.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Psychiatry Reports (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Migration, Health and Trauma
Keywords
continuous traumatic stress, political violence, life cycle, risk and protective factors, developmental perspective, psychological distress, Israel, trauma exposure, assessment and intervention
MeSH terms
Exposure to Violence, Humans, Israel, Longitudinal Studies, Politics, Risk Factors, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Protective Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review