Cited by 60Eating Disorders and BehaviorsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesNutrition, Health and Food Behavior

Cognitive behavioral therapy for anorexia nervosa: an update

Open access
Dalle Grave, Riccardo, El Ghoch, Marwan, Sartirana, Massimiliano, Calugi, Simona·2016·Current Psychiatry Reports

Abstract

Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for anorexia nervosa (AN), based on Beck's cognitive theory, was developed in a "generic" form in the early eighties. In recent years, however, improved knowledge of the mechanisms involved in maintaining eating disorder psychopathology has led to the development of a "specific" form of CBT, termed CBT-E (E = enhanced), designed to treat all forms of eating disorders, including AN, from outpatient to inpatient settings. Although more studies are required to assess the relative effectiveness of CBT-E with respect to other available treatments, the data indicate that in outpatient settings it is both viable and promising for adults and adolescents with AN. Encouraging results are also emerging from inpatient CBT-E, particularly in adolescents, and clinical services offering CBT-E at different levels of care are now offered in several countries around the world. However, CBT-E requires dissemination in order to become widely available to patients.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11920-015-0643-4

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 62 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Beck AT, Rush AJ, Shaw BF, Emery G. Cognitive therapy of de- pression. New York: Guilford Press; 1979.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dalle Grave, R., El Ghoch, M., Sartirana, M., & Calugi, S.
Affiliations
Casa di Cura Villa Garda (IT)
Venue
Current Psychiatry Reports
Published
2015-12-22
Volume
18
Issue
1
Pages
2-2
ISSN
  • 1523-3812 (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-1645
OpenAlex
W2238438032
Cited by
60
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2
FWCI
0.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Psychiatry Reports (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • IRIS UNIMORE (University of Modena and Reggio Emilia) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
Keywords
cognitive behavioral therapy, anorexia nervosa, CBT-E, eating disorders, Beck's cognitive theory, outpatient care, inpatient care, adolescents, treatment dissemination
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Anorexia Nervosa, Humans, Psychopathology, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review