Cited by 579Health disparities and outcomesTelemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationHealth Literacy and Information Accessibility

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Disparities in Health Care and the Digital Divide

Open access
Saeed, Sy Atezaz, Masters, Ross MacRae·2021·Current Psychiatry Reports

Abstract

Purpose of review Disparities in health outcomes are a well documented and worrisome part of our health care system. These disparities persist in spite of, and are occasionally exacerbated by, new technologies that are intended to improve health care. This results in a "digital divide" in which populations that have poorer health outcomes continue to have poorer health outcomes despite technological improvements.Recent findings In many ways, the digitical divide is already shrinking via improved access to internet and technology/process improvements. For example, people with schizophrenia, PTSD, and bipolar disorder have had their care successfully augmented by new technology. However, problems persist- being impoverished, female, and black all correlate with decreased probability of completing a telehealth visit, and millions of americans have insufficient internet access to complete telehealth visits. We must continue to utilize new technology in health care to improve outcomes, but we must also be wary to ensure those outcomes are equitable across different populations.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11920-021-01274-4

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 22 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Institute of Medicine. Unequal treatment: confronting racial and ethnic disparities in health care. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C 2003].

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Saeed, S. A., & Masters, R. M.
Affiliations
East Carolina University (US)
Corresponding author
Saeed, Sy Atezaz
Venue
Current Psychiatry Reports
Published
2021-07-23
Volume
23
Issue
9
Pages
61-61
ISSN
  • 1523-3812 (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-1645
OpenAlex
W3185220037
Cited by
578
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 131 · 2025: 177 · 2024: 149 · 2023: 80 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 3
FWCI
37.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Psychiatry Reports (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
Keywords
health care disparities, digital divide, telemedicine, internet access, health equity, schizophrenia, post-traumatic stress disorder, bipolar disorder, socioeconomic status, racial disparities, gender disparities, health technology
MeSH terms
Black or African American, Female, Humans, Telemedicine, Internet, Healthcare Disparities, Digital Divide

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review