Cited by 23Analytical chemistry methods developmentHeavy Metal Exposure and ToxicityElectrochemical Analysis and Applications

Lead Quantification in Urine Samples of Athletes by Coupling DLLME with UV-Vis Spectrophotometry

Faraji, Hakim, Helalizadeh, Masoumeh·2017·Biological Trace Element Research

Abstract

Urine lead level is one of the most employed measures of lead exposure and risk. The urine samples used in this study were obtained from ten healthy male cyclists. Dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction combined with ultraviolet and visible spectrophotometry was utilized for preconcentration, extraction, and determination of lead in urine samples. Optimization of the independent variables was carried out based on chemometric methods in three steps. According to the screening and optimization study, 133 μL of CCl 4 (extracting solvent), 1.34 mL ethanol (dispersing solvent), pH 2.0, 0.00 % of salt, and 0.1 % O,O-diethyl dithiophosphoric (chelating agent) were used as the optimum independent variables for microextraction and determination of lead. Under the optimized conditions, R 2 was 0.9991, and linearity range was 0.01-100 μg L-1. Precision was evaluated in terms of repeatability and intermediate precision, with relative standard deviations being <9.1 and <15.3 %, respectively. The accuracy was estimated using urine samples of cyclists as real samples and it was confirmed. The relative error of ≤5 % was considered significant in the method specificity study. The lead concentration mean for the cyclists was 3.79 μg L-1 in urine samples. As a result, the proposed method is a robust technique to quantify lead concentrations higher than 11.6 ng L-1 in urine samples.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12011-016-0844-7

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The accurate determination of lead is an important issue in analytical chemistry because of very low concentrations in some samples and matrix interference in real samples.

    “Therefore, the accurate determination of lead is an important issue in analytical chemistry because of the very low concentrations in some samples as well as the presence of a matrix in real samples, which may interfere with instrumental determination [15,16,17].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Faraji, H., & Helalizadeh, M.
Affiliations
  • Islamic Azad University of Varamin (IR)
  • Sport Sciences Research Institute (IR)
Corresponding author
Faraji, Hakim
Venue
Biological Trace Element Research
Published
2016-09-15
Volume
176
Issue
2
Pages
258-269
ISSN
  • 0163-4984 (ISSN-L)
  • 1559-0720
OpenAlex
W2518859619
Cited by
23
References
44
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3
FWCI
2.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biological Trace Element Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Analytical chemistry methods development
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Heavy Metal Exposure and Toxicity
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Electrochemistry › Electrochemical Analysis and Applications
Keywords
urinary lead, lead exposure, cyclists, dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction, preconcentration, chemometric optimization, carbon tetrachloride extraction, UV-Vis spectroscopy, trace metal analysis, occupational exposure
MeSH terms
Adult, Humans, Lead, Male, Software, Spectrophotometry, Ultraviolet, Young Adult, Athletes, Liquid Phase Microextraction, Healthy Volunteers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review