The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
How Do Rituals Affect Cooperation?: An Experimental Field Study Comparing Nine Ritual Types
Abstract
Collective rituals have long puzzled anthropologists, yet little is known about how rituals affect participants. Our study investigated the effects of nine naturally occurring rituals on prosociality. We operationalized prosociality as (1) attitudes about fellow ritual participants and (2) decisions in a public goods game. The nine rituals varied in levels of synchrony and levels of sacred attribution. We found that rituals with synchronous body movements were more likely to enhance prosocial attitudes. We also found that rituals judged to be sacred were associated with the largest contributions in the public goods game. Path analysis favored a model in which sacred values mediate the effects of synchronous movements on prosocial behaviors. Our analysis offers the first quantitative evidence for the long-standing anthropological conjecture that rituals orchestrate body motions and sacred values to support prosociality. Our analysis, moreover, adds precision to this old conjecture with evidence of a specific mechanism: ritual synchrony increases perceptions of oneness with others, which increases sacred values to intensify prosocial behaviors.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“For example, the visual synchronization of physical movements increases feelings of affiliation (32), self-esteem (33), compassion and altruistic behavior (34), rapport (35), and increased prosocial behavior (36), while during arguments, synchrony decreases (37).”
From New Frontiers in Heart Rate Variability and Social Coherence Research: Techniques, Technologies, and Implications for Improving Group Dynamics and Outcomes (2017) · cites this paper as [36]
In the citing paper
“Group rituals that involve more synchronous body movements are associated with more trust, cooperation, and feelings of oneness than are other group rituals (Fischer et al., 2013).”
From The Psychology of Rituals: An Integrative Review and Process-Based Framework (2018) · cites this paper as Fischer et al., 2013
In the citing paper
“Since then, a host of empirical studies have provided evidence linking group rituals to positive social outcomes, such as cooperation, social cohesion, and perceived social support (Fischer, Callander, Reddish, & Bulbulia, 2013;Hopkins et al., 2015;Páez et al., 2007;Páez, Rimé, Basabe, Wlodarczyk, & Zumeta, 2015;Ruffle & Sosis, 2007;Sosis & Ruffle, 2003).”
From The Psychology of Rituals: An Integrative Review and Process-Based Framework (2018) · cites this paper as Fischer, Callander, Reddish, & Bulbulia, 2013
In the citing paper
“Supporting this, research has shown that rituals that are judged to be more sacred or meaningful are associated with more cooperation and feelings of oneness than are other group rituals (Fischer et al., 2013).”
From The Psychology of Rituals: An Integrative Review and Process-Based Framework (2018) · cites this paper as Fischer et al., 2013
Citations
Cites
THE ELEMENTARY FORMS OF RELIGIOUS LIFE
Durkheim, É., & Swain, J. W. (1916) · AJN American Journal of Nursing · doi:10.2307/3405938 · Cited by 10,708
Inclusion of Other in the Self Scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness.
Aron, A., Aron, E. N., & Smollan, D. (1992) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.63.4.596 · Cited by 5,157
The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life:
(2011) · Lutterworth Press eBooks · doi:10.2307/j.ctt1cgf6tc.14 · Cited by 3,319
Is Anybody out There? Antecedents of Trust in Global Virtual Teams
Jarvenpaa, S. L., Knoll, K., & Leidner, D. E. (1998) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.1998.11518185 · Cited by 1,906
Wiltermuth, S. S., & Heath, C. (2009) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02253.x · Cited by 1,717
Common fate, similarity, and other indices of the status of aggregates of persons as social entities
Campbell, D. T. (2007) · Systems Research and Behavioral Science · doi:10.1002/bs.3830030103 · Cited by 1,597
It's All in the Timing: Interpersonal Synchrony Increases Affiliation
Hove, M. J., & Risen, J. L. (2009) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.2009.27.6.949 · Cited by 1,334 · cited 2×
“Studies investigating synchronous behaviors among pairs (dyadic synchrony and mimicry) show that partners who match each other’s postures, motions, and vocalizations tend to express higher levels of subjective liking, tend to sense enhanced oneness with others (entitativity), and tend to become more charitable (Campbe…”
BackgroundVarieties of groups and the perception of group entitativity.
Lickel, B. A., Hamilton, D. L., Wieczorkowska, G., Lewis, A. C., Sherman, S. J., & Uhles, A. N. (2000) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.78.2.223 · Cited by 942
In Gods we Trust: The Evolutionary Landscape of Religion
Hinde, R. A. (2003) · Ars Disputandi · doi:10.1080/15665399.2003.10819760 · Cited by 927
Thinking the unthinkable: sacred values and taboo cognitions
Tetlock, P. E. (2003) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(03)00135-9 · Cited by 915
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Fetterman, D. M. (1998). Ethnography (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
- Schelling, T. (2006). Micromotives and Macrobehavior (Kindle edition). New York: W. W. Norton. Originally published in 1978.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The cultural evolution of prosocial religions
Norenzayan, A., Shariff, A. F., Gervais, W. M., Willard, A. K., McNamara, R. A., Slingerland, E., & Henrich, J. (2016) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x14001356 · Cited by 934
Let’s Dance Together: Synchrony, Shared Intentionality and Cooperation
Reddish, P., Fischer, R., & Bulbulia, J. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0071182 · Cited by 556
Self-citationThe Ties That Bind Us: Ritual, Fusion, and Identification
Whitehouse, H., & Lanman, J. A. (2014) · Current Anthropology · doi:10.1086/678698 · Cited by 509
The Psychology of Rituals: An Integrative Review and Process-Based Framework
Hobson, N. M., Schroeder, J., Risen, J. L., Xygalatas, D., & Inzlicht, M. (2018) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868317734944 · Cited by 354
“Supporting this, research has shown that rituals that are judged to be more sacred or meaningful are associated with more cooperation and feelings of oneness than are other group rituals (Fischer et al., 2013).”
BackgroundMcKay, R., & Whitehouse, H. (2015) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0038455 · Cited by 353
Metadata
- Authors
- Fischer, R., Callander, R., Reddish, P., & Bulbulia, J.
- Affiliations
- Victoria University of Wellington (NZ)
- Masaryk University (CZ)
- Corresponding author
- Bulbulia, Joseph
- Venue
- Human Nature
- Published
- 2013-05-11
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 115-125
- ISSN
- 1045-6767 (ISSN-L)
- 1936-4776
- OpenAlex
- W93630498
- Cited by
- 191
- References
- 43
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 8
- FWCI
- 40.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Human Nature (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Violence, Religion, and Philosophy
- Keywords
- collective ritual, prosocial behavior, sacred values, body movement, public goods game, cooperation, prosocial attitudes
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Ceremonial Behavior, Cooperative Behavior, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, New Zealand, Social Values, Gift Giving, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
