CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 41

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Population Ecology of Despotism: Concessions and Migration Between Central and Peripheral Habitats

Bell, Adrian Viliami, Winterhalder, Bruce·2014·Human Nature
DOI 10.1007/s12110-014-9190-7
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12110-014-9190-7

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Bell and Winterhalder (2014) mathematically demonstrated that despots can lessen their monopoly on suitability by making concessions so that others find it more suitable to stay as a subordinate than to disperse to the next most suitable habitat as an autonomous individual.

    “Bell and Winterhalder (2014) mathematically demonstrated that instead of driving more rapid expansion, despots can lessen their monopoly on suitability by making concessions so that others find it more suitable to stay as a subordinate than to disperse to the next most suitable habitat as an autonomous individual.”

    From The Ideal Distribution Model and Archaeological Settlement Patterning (2022) · cites this paper as Bell and Winterhalder 2014

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. Allen, R. C. (1997). Agriculture and the origins of the state in anciet Egypt. Explorations in Economic History, 34, 135–154. · DOI
  2. Allen, J., & O’Connell, J. F. (2008). Getting from Sunda to Sahul. In G. A. Clark, F. Leach, & S. O’Connor (Eds.), Islands of inquiry: Colonisation, seafaring and the archaeology of maritime landscapes (pp. 31–46). Canberra: Australian National University Press.
  3. Buston, P. M., & Zink, A. G. (2009). Reproductive skew and the evolution of conflict resolution: a synthesis of transactional and tug-of-war models. Behavioral Ecology, 20(3), 672–684. doi: 10.1093/beheco/arp050 . · DOI
  4. Carneiro, R. L. (1970). A theory of the origin of the state: traditional theories of state origins are considered and rejected in favor of a new ecological hypothesis. Science, 169(3947), 733–738. · DOI
  5. Domar, E. D. (1970). The causes of slavery or serfdom: a hypothesis. The Journal of Economic History, 30(1), 135–154. · DOI
  6. Fretwell, S. D., & Lucas, H. L. (1970). On territorial behaviour and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birds. I. Theoretical development. Acta Biotheoretica, 19, 16–36. · DOI · Paper page
  7. Hakoyama, H., & Iguchi, K. (2001). Transition from a random to an ideal free to an ideal despotic distribution: the effect of individual difference in growth. Journal of Ethology, 19(2), 129–137. · DOI
  8. Johnson, A. W., & Earle, T. K. (2000). The evolution of human societies: from foraging group to agrarian state (2nd ed.). Palo Alto: Stanford University Press. · DOI
  9. Kennett, D. J., & Winterhalder, B. (2008). Demographic expansion, despotism, and the colonisation of East and South Polynesia. In G. Clark, F. Leach, & S. O’Connor (Eds.), Islands of inquiry: Colonisation, seafaring and the archaeology of maritime landscapes (pp. 87–96). Canberra: Australia National University Press.
  10. Kennett, D., Anderson, A., & Winterhalder, B. (2006). The ideal free distribution, food production and the colonization of Oceania. In D. Kennett & B. Winterhalder (Eds.), Behavioral ecology and the transition to agriculture. Berkeley: University of California Press. · DOI · Paper page
  11. Kennett, D. J., Winterhalder, B., Bartruff, J., & Erlandson, J. M. (2009). An ecological model for the emergence of institutionalized social hierarchies on California’s Northern Channel islands. In S. Shennan (Ed.), Pattern and process in cultural evolution (pp. 297–314). Berkeley: University of California Press.
  12. Shennan, S. (2008). Population processes and their consequences in early Neolithic central Europe. In J-P. Bocquet-Appel & O. Bar-Yosef (Eds.), The neolithic demographic transition and its consequences (pp. 315–329). Netherlands: Springer. · DOI
  13. Steward, J. (1949). Cultural causality and law: a trial formulation of the development of early civilizations. American Anthropologist, 51(1), 1–27. · DOI
  14. Summers, K. (2005). The evolutionary ecology of despotism. Evolution and Human Behavior, 26, 106–135. · DOI · Paper page
  15. Trigger, B. G. (2003). Understanding early civilizations: A comparative study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. · DOI
  16. Winterhalder, B., Kennett, D. J., Grote, M. N., & Bartruff, J. (2010). Ideal free settlement of California’s Northern Channel Islands. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 29, 469–490. · DOI · Paper page
  17. Wittfogel, K. A. (1957). Oriental despotism: A comparative study of total power. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  18. Zimmerman, G. S., LaHaye, W. S., & Gutierrez, R. J. (2003). Empirical support for a despotic distribution in a California spotted owl population. Behavioral Ecology, 14(3), 433–437. doi: 10.1093/beheco/14.3.433 . · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Bell, A. V., & Winterhalder, B.
Venue
Human Nature
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2014-02-20
Volume
25
Issue
1
Pages
121-135
ISSN
  • 1045-6767
  • 1936-4776
DOI
10.1007/s12110-014-9190-7
Cited by
41
References
0
Language
en
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review