Cited by 7

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Negative performance evaluation in the imposter phenomenon

Gadsby, Stephen, Hohwy, Jakob·2024·Current Psychology

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12144-023-05030-0

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 25

  1. Badawy, R. L., Gazdag, B. A., Bentley, J. R., & Brouer, R. L. (2018). Are all impostors created equal? Exploring gender differences in the impostor phenomenon-performance link. Personality and Individual differences, 131, 156–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.04.044. · DOI
  2. Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A., & Brown, G. K. (1996). Beck Depression Inventory Manual (2nd ed.). San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation Harcourt Brace & Company. · DOI · Paper page
  3. Blum, D., Holling, H., Galibert, M. S., & Forthmann, B. (2016). Task difficulty prediction of figural analogies. Intelligence, 56, 72–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2016.03.001. · DOI
  4. Brauer, K., & Proyer, R. T. (2022). The Impostor Phenomenon and causal attributions of positive feedback on intelligence tests. Personality and Individual differences, 194, 111663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2022.111663. · DOI
  5. Bravata, D. M., Watts, S. A., Keefer, A. L., Madhusudhan, D. K., Taylor, K. T., Clark, D. M., Nelson, R. S., Cokley, K. O., & Hagg, H. K. (2019). Prevalence, predictors, and treatment of Impostor Syndrome: A systematic review. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 1–24. · DOI · Paper page
  6. Campbell, J. D., & Fairey, P. (1985). Effects of self-esteem, hypothetical explanations, and verbalization of expectancies on future performance. Journal of personality and social psychology, 48(5), 1097. · DOI
  7. Clance, P. R. (1985). The impostor phenomenon: Overcoming the fear that haunts your success (kindle version ed.). Peachtree. · DOI
  8. Clance, P. R., & O’Toole, M. A. (1987). The imposter phenomenon: An internal barrier to empowerment and achievement. Women & Therapy, 6(3), 51–64. https://doi.org/10.1300/J015V06N03_05. · DOI · Paper page
  9. Condon, D. M., & Revelle, W. (2014). The international cognitive ability resource: Development and initial validation of a public-domain measure. Intelligence, 43, 52–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2014.01.004. · DOI
  10. Cozzarelli, C., & Major, B. (1990). Exploring the validity of the impostor phenomenon. Journal of social and clinical psychology, 9(4), 401–417. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.1990.9.4.401. · DOI
  11. Ferrari, J. R., & Thompson, T. (2006). Impostor fears: Links with self-presentational concerns and self-handicapping behaviours. Personality and Individual differences, 40(2), 341–352. · DOI
  12. Gadsby, S. (2022). Imposter Syndrome and Self-Deception. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 100(2), 247–261. https://doi.org/10.1080/00048402.2021.1874445. · DOI
  13. Gadsby, S., & Hohwy, J. (2022). Incentivising accuracy reduces bias in the imposter phenomenon. Current Psychology, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03878-2. · DOI
  14. Holmes, S. W., Kertay, L., Adamson, L. B., Holland, C., & Clance, P. R. (1993). Measuring the impostor phenomenon: A comparison of Clance’s IP Scale and Harvey’s IP Scale. Journal of personality assessment, 60(1), 48–59. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa6001_3. · DOI · Paper page
  15. Ibrahim, F., Göddertz, D., & Herzberg, P. Y. (2022). An experimental study of the non-self-serving attributional bias within the impostor phenomenon and its relation to the fixed mindset. Current Psychology, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03486-0. · DOI
  16. Kovacs, M., & Beck, A. T. (1978). Maladaptive cognitive structures in depression. American journal of Psychiatry, 135(5), 525–533. · DOI
  17. Leary, M. R., Patton, K. M., Orlando, A. E., & Funk, W., W (2000). The impostor phenomenon: Self-perceptions, reflected appraisals, and interpersonal strategies. Journal of personality, 68(4), 725–756. · DOI · Paper page
  18. McGregor, L. N., Gee, D. E., & Posey, K. E. (2008). I feel like a fraud and it depresses me: The relation between the imposter phenomenon and depression. Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal, 36(1), 43–48. · DOI
  19. Rohrmann, S., Bechtoldt, M. N., & Leonhardt, M. (2016). Validation of the impostor phenomenon among managers. Frontiers in psychology, 7, 821. · DOI
  20. Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton University Press. · DOI · Paper page
  21. Sakulku, J., & Alexander, J. (2011). The impostor phenomenon. The Journal of Behavioral Science, 6(1), 75–97.
  22. Stone-Sabali, S., Bernard, D. L., Mills, K. J., & Osborn, P. R. (2023). Mapping the evolution of the impostor phenomenon research: A bibliometric analysis. Current Psychology, 1–13. · DOI
  23. Thompson, T., Davis, H., & Davidson, J. (1998). Attributional and affective responses of impostors to academic success and failure outcomes. Personality and Individual differences, 25(2), 381–396. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0191-8869(98)00065-8. · DOI · Paper page
  24. Thompson, T., Foreman, P., & Martin, F. (2000). Impostor fears and perfectionistic concern over mistakes. Personality and Individual differences, 29(4), 629–647. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0191-8869(99)00218-4. · DOI · Paper page
  25. Zimmermann, F. (2020). The dynamics of motivated beliefs. American Economic Review, 110(2), 337–361. · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Gadsby, S., & Hohwy, J.
Venue
Current Psychology
Published
2023-08-14
Volume
43
Issue
10
Pages
9300-9308
ISSN
  • 1046-1310
  • 1936-4733
Cited by
7
References
4
Language
en
Funders
  • Australian Government Research Training Program (Australian Government Research Training Program)
  • Monash University Postgraduate Publications Award (Monash University Postgraduate Publications Award)
  • Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (1267022N)
  • Faculty of Arts at Monash University (Faculty of Arts at Monash University)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review