Cited by 7COVID-19 and Mental HealthMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum

Associations between psychological flexibility and mental health problems during the Covid-19 pandemic: a three-level meta-analytic review

Yao, Xiaoyu, Chan, Ko Ling, Chen, Shimin, Gao, Shuling·2024·Current Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12144-024-05628-y

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yao, X., Chan, K. L., Chen, S., & Gao, S.
Affiliations
  • Shanghai University (CN)
  • Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK)
  • China University of Mining and Technology (CN)
Corresponding author
Gao, Shuling
Venue
Current Psychology
Published
2024-01-23
Volume
43
Issue
26
Pages
22734-22753
ISSN
  • 1046-1310 (ISSN-L)
  • 1936-4733
OpenAlex
W4391141055
Cited by
7
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2
FWCI
3.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Current Psychology (publishedVersion)
Funders
Humanities and Social Sciences Youth Foundation, Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China (20YJC840012)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
Keywords
psychological flexibility, mental illness, COVID-19 pandemic, depressive symptoms, anxiety symptoms, stress symptoms, protective factors, sex differences

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review