Cited by 38Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsDigital Mental Health InterventionsMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation

Baseline psychological inflexibility moderates the outcome pain interference in a randomized controlled trial on Internet-based Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for chronic pain

Open access
Probst, Thomas, Baumeister, Harald, McCracken, Lance M., Lin, Jiaxi·2018·Journal of Clinical Medicine

Abstract

This study re-investigated data of a randomized controlled trial on Internet-based Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for chronic pain (ACTonPain). Baseline psychological inflexibility was examined as a moderator of the outcome pain interference. In the ACTonPain trial, participants with chronic pain were randomized to one of three conditions: guided Internet-based ACT (n = 100), unguided Internet-based ACT (n = 101), and waitlist (n = 101). Moderation analyses were performed with the SPSS macro PROCESS. Pain interference according to the Multidimensional Pain Inventory (MPI) was the primary outcome in this trial, and the potential moderator psychological inflexibility was measured with the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire (AAQ-II). Psychological inflexibility at baseline moderated the outcome between guided Internet-based ACT and waitlist 9-weeks as well as 6-months after randomization. (both p < 0.05). Between unguided Internet-based ACT and waitlist, psychological inflexibility moderated the outcome 6-months after randomization (p < 0.05). Internet-based ACT was superior to waitlist for participants with less psychological inflexibility at baseline, but Internet-based ACT became increasingly comparable to waitlist at higher AAQ-II baseline values. Future research should investigate whether the results can be replicated in more individualized and tailored face-to-face settings.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/jcm8010024

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • People with chronic pain are more likely to benefit from an ACT-based pain intervention in case of initially lower psychological flexibility.

    “As one example, it has been shown that people with chronic pain are more likely to benefit from an Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) based pain intervention in case of initially lower psychological flexibility (Probst et al., 2018), and psychological flexibility has been verified as mechanism of change (Lin et al., 2018).”

    From Special issue on digital health interventions in chronic medical conditions: Editorial (2022) · cites this paper as Probst et al., 2018

    The Discussion says the opposite: people with chronic pain needed a certain amount of psychological flexibility at baseline to benefit from Internet-based ACT. It recommends ACT over no treatment for those who were psychologically flexible at baseline, but not for those with higher psychological inflexibility. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Psychological flexibility is a mediator of change in ACT for reducing pain-associated disability.

    “Psychological flexibility has been proposed as a mediator of change, specifically in ACT, for reducing pain-associated disability [25,29].”

    From Lessons Learned from an Attempted Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial for Improvement of Chronic Pain-Associated Disability in Green Professions: Long-Term Effectiveness of a Guided Online-Based Acceptance and Commitment Therapy  (PACT-A) (2022) · cites this paper as [29]

    The Introduction identifies psychological flexibility as central to ACT, and the Treatment section says the modules aim to increase it. The Discussion says increases in flexibility are associated with improved outcomes, but this paper tests baseline inflexibility as a moderator of pain interference, not flexibility as a mediator of reduced pain-associated disability. No page numbers are provided in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The other five articles were excluded because they comprised the same samples as the selected five.

    “The other five were excluded because they comprised the same samples as the selected five”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [18]Hayes A.F. Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis 2nd ed. The Guilford Press New York, NY, USA 2018

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Probst, T., Baumeister, H., McCracken, L. M., & Lin, J.
Affiliations
  • Universität für Weiterbildung Krems (AT)
  • Universität Ulm (DE)
  • King's College London (GB)
  • University of Freiburg (DE)
Corresponding author
Probst, Thomas
Venue
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2018-12-25
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
24
ISSN
2077-0383 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2906503559
Cited by
38
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3
FWCI
4.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • OPen Access Repositorium der Universität Ulm (OPARU) (Ulm University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Universität Ulm, Kommunikations- und Informationszentrum (kiz) (cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Keywords
psychological inflexibility, acceptance and commitment therapy, online therapy, chronic pain, pain interference, moderators, Acceptance and Action Questionnaire, Multidimensional Pain Inventory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review