The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 8 of the 11 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
Interest in Behavioral and Psychological Treatments Delivered Face-to-Face, by Telephone, and by Internet
Open accessAbstract
Little is known about the acceptability of internet and telephone treatments, or what factors might influence patient interest in receiving treatments via these media. This study examined the level of interest in face-to-face, telephone, and internet treatment and factors that might influence that interest. Six hundred fifty-eight primary care patients were surveyed. Among patients interested in some form of behavioral treatment, 91.9% were interested or would consider face-to-face care compared to 62.4% for telephone and 48.0% for internet care. Symptom severity was unrelated to interest in treatment delivery medium. Interest in specific treatment targeting mental health, lifestyle, or pain was more strongly predictive of interest in face-to-face treatment than telephone or internet treatments. Only interest in lifestyle intervention was predictive of interest in internet-delivered treatment. Time constraints as a barrier were more predictive of interest in telephone and internet treatments compared to face-to-face. These findings provide some support for the notion that telephone and internet treatments may overcome barriers. People who seek help with lifestyle change may be more open to internet-delivered treatments, while interest in internet intervention does not appear to be associated with the desire for help in mental health, pain, or tobacco use. © 2010 The Society of Behavioral Medicine.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
42 Own result · 15 Own interpretation · 7 Own method · 3 Partly supported · 3 No basis given · 1 Supported · 1 Not checked yet · accuracy not yet measured
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Adherence to telephone treatments tends to be very good (1).”
§ Interest in Behavioral and Psychological Treatments Delivered Face-to-Face, by Telephone and by Internet > Abstract > Conclusions
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [1] Mohr DC, Vella L, Hart S, Heckman T, Simon G. The effect of telephone-administered psychotherapy on symptoms of depression and attrition: A meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice. 2008; 15: 243-253. source
The Results (Attrition; page unavailable) report a mean dropout rate of 7.56% across 12 studies of telephone-administered psychotherapy. The Discussion (page unavailable) describes this as low relative to attrition reported in face-to-face psychotherapy, supporting the claim that patients generally stayed with the telephone treatments studied. (LLM, conf=0.89)
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Adherence to standalone internet delivered treatments (9, 10) remains very low.”
§ Interest in Behavioral and Psychological Treatments Delivered Face-to-Face, by Telephone and by Internet > Abstract > Conclusions
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [9] Eysenbach G. The law of attrition. J Med Internet Res. 2005; 7: e11. source
In “The Law of Attrition” section (page not provided), Eysenbach reports very low completion of Internet-based self-help programs: about 1% for a panic-disorder program and 0.5% for Moodgym in an open setting. The paper treats discontinuation as a common problem for Internet-based eHealth interventions, supporting the claim about low adherence. (LLM, conf=0.89)
- Partly supportedcites [10] Christensen H, Griffiths KM, Farrer L. Adherence in internet interventions for anxiety and depression. J Med Internet Res. 2009; 11: e13. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction and Discussion > Findings (page unavailable) describe poorer adherence on open-access websites than in trials, supporting concern about adherence in one setting. But the review reports relatively high treatment adherence—over 50%—in randomized trials and says Internet interventions are not inherently non-adherent. The blanket claim about standalone treatments is therefore broader than the evidence supports. (LLM, conf=0.85)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Interest in lifestyle intervention was also more predictive of interest in internet therapy than telephone therapy (p=.01).”
§ Interest in Behavioral and Psychological Treatments Delivered Face-to-Face, by Telephone and by Internet > Results > Predictors of Interest in Receiving Behavioral Services by Treatment Medium
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Interest in specific treatment targeting mental health, lifestyle or pain was more strongly predictive of interest in face-to-face treatment than telephone or internet treatments.”
§ Interest in Behavioral and Psychological Treatments Delivered Face-to-Face, by Telephone and by Internet > Abstract > Results
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Time Constraints as a barrier was more predictive of interest in telephone and internet treatments, compared to face-to-face.”
§ Interest in Behavioral and Psychological Treatments Delivered Face-to-Face, by Telephone and by Internet > Abstract > Results
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“There was no significant difference in the effect of interest in lifestyle intervention on face-to-face versus internet administered treatment (p = .17).”
§ Interest in Behavioral and Psychological Treatments Delivered Face-to-Face, by Telephone and by Internet > Results > Predictors of Interest in Receiving Behavioral Services by Treatment Medium
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Among patients interested in some form of behavioral treatment, 91.9% were interested or would consider face-to-face care, compared to 62.1% for telephone and 48.3% for internet care.”
§ Interest in Behavioral and Psychological Treatments Delivered Face-to-Face, by Telephone and by Internet > Abstract > Results
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Interest in lifestyle treatment was more strongly predictive of interest in face-to-face treatment than telephone treatment (p=.0006).”
§ Interest in Behavioral and Psychological Treatments Delivered Face-to-Face, by Telephone and by Internet > Results > Predictors of Interest in Receiving Behavioral Services by Treatment Medium
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“People who seek help with lifestyle change may be more open to internet delivered treatments while interest in internet intervention does not appear to be associated with the desire for help in mental health, pain or tobacco use.”
§ Interest in Behavioral and Psychological Treatments Delivered Face-to-Face, by Telephone and by Internet > Abstract > Conclusions
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Among 492 (74.8%) patients responding that they were interested in receiving some form of psychological or behavioral intervention, 297 (60.4%) indicated interest in mental health treatment, 328 (66.7%) indicated interest in lifestyle intervention, 59 (12.0%) indicated interest in smoking cessation, and 115 (23.4%) indicated interest in pain management.”
§ Interest in Behavioral and Psychological Treatments Delivered Face-to-Face, by Telephone and by Internet > Results > Frequency of Treatment Target and Delivery Medium
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- It may state two separate claims as one. 17
- Probably not a substantial claim. 5
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Telephone administered treatments have been shown to be effective for mental health problems (1), lifestyle (weight loss and exercise) interventions (2), smoking cessation (3), and pain management (4).”
§ Interest in Behavioral and Psychological Treatments Delivered Face-to-Face, by Telephone and by Internet > Abstract > Conclusions
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [1] Mohr DC, Vella L, Hart S, Heckman T, Simon G. The effect of telephone-administered psychotherapy on symptoms of depression and attrition: A meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice. 2008; 15: 243-253. source
Citation (1) supports the mental-health portion of the sentence, not the separately cited lifestyle, smoking-cessation, or pain-management claims. The Abstract and Discussion report significant reductions in depressive symptoms with telephone-administered psychotherapy compared with control conditions; the evidence is specifically about depression. (LLM, conf=0.90)
- Partly supportedcites [2] Pierce JP, Newman VA, Natarajan L, et al. Telephone counseling helps maintain long-term adherence to a high-vegetable dietary pattern. Journal of Nutrition. 2007; 137: 2291-2296. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Discussion (page unavailable) says the telephone-counseling intervention produced sustained dietary behavior change, supporting effectiveness for a lifestyle intervention. But citation (2) is attached specifically to weight-loss and exercise interventions; this paper reports dietary change, not effectiveness for either of those outcomes. (LLM, conf=0.88)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [3] Curry SJ, McBride C, Grothaus LC, Louie D, Wagner EH. A randomized trial of self-help materials, personalized feedback, and telephone counseling with nonvolunteer smokers. Journal of Consulting and Counseling Psychology. 1995; 63: 1005-1014. source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“A growing body of research also supports the efficacy of internet-based interventions for these treatment targets (4–8).”
§ Interest in Behavioral and Psychological Treatments Delivered Face-to-Face, by Telephone and by Internet > Abstract > Conclusions
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [4] Hailey D, Roine R, Ohinmaa A. The effectiveness of telemental health applications: A review. Can J Psychiatry. 2008; 53: 769-778. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Discussion reports evidence that Internet-based programs can improve a range of mental health conditions. The Smoking section says all smoking-cessation studies it reviewed used telephone-based technology, not Internet interventions. The passages do not establish efficacy for Internet-based lifestyle or pain-management interventions. (LLM, conf=0.88)
- Partly supportedcites [5] Spek V, Cuijpers P, Nyklicek I, et al. Internet-based cognitive behaviour therapy for symptoms of depression and anxiety: A meta-analysis. Psychological Medicine. 2007; 37: 319-328. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The indexed Abstract reports that internet-based CBT improved symptoms of depression and anxiety compared with control conditions, supporting the mental-health part of the claim. It does not report efficacy for lifestyle interventions, smoking cessation, or pain management. (LLM, conf=0.88)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [6] Tate DF, Jackvony EH, Wing RR. A randomized trial comparing human e-mail counseling, computer-automated tailored counseling, and no counseling in an Internet weight loss program. Archives of Internal Medicine. 2006; 166: 1620-1625. source
- Partly supportedcites [7] Bee PE, Bower P, Lovell K, et al. Psychotherapy mediated by remote communication technologies: A meta-analytic review. BMC Psychiatry. 2008; 8: 60. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Background (page not available) describes promising results for non-face-to-face psychotherapy and discusses internet-based CBT for depression and anxiety. The Results report two internet-delivered studies among trials targeting mental health conditions. The paper does not establish efficacy for lifestyle change, smoking cessation, or pain management; its Methods explicitly exclude studies of addictions. (LLM, conf=0.87)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [8] Schulz PJ, Rubinell S, Hartung U. An internet-based approach to enhance self-managementof chronic low back pain in the italian-speaking population of Switzerland: Results from a pilot study. Int J Public Health. 2007; 52: 286-294. source
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“There were no effects of depression, anxiety, BMI or smoking status on interest in a specific treatment delivery modality.”
§ Interest in Behavioral and Psychological Treatments Delivered Face-to-Face, by Telephone and by Internet > Discussion
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“658 primary care patients were surveyed.”
§ Interest in Behavioral and Psychological Treatments Delivered Face-to-Face, by Telephone and by Internet > Abstract > Methods
plainn = 658- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Greater interest in receiving mental health treatment was associated with greater interest in receiving care face-to-face (OR=7.00, p<.0001) and via telephone (OR=2.69, p=.001) but was not statistically related to interest in receiving care via the Internet (p=.69).”
§ Interest in Behavioral and Psychological Treatments Delivered Face-to-Face, by Telephone and by Internet > Results > Predictors of Interest in Receiving Behavioral Services by Treatment Medium
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Greater interest in receiving pain management was associated with great interest in receiving care face-to-face (OR=11.66, p=.001), but not via telephone (p=.58) or internet (p=.26).”
§ Interest in Behavioral and Psychological Treatments Delivered Face-to-Face, by Telephone and by Internet > Results > Predictors of Interest in Receiving Behavioral Services by Treatment Medium
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Greater interest in receiving treatment focused on healthy lifestyle (diet and/or exercise) was associated with great interest in receiving care face-to-face (OR=13.07, p<.0001) via telephone (OR=3.12, p<.0001) and the internet (OR=7.08, p<.0001).”
§ Interest in Behavioral and Psychological Treatments Delivered Face-to-Face, by Telephone and by Internet > Results > Predictors of Interest in Receiving Behavioral Services by Treatment Medium
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“There were significant main effects for age such that greater age was associated with significantly lower interest in face-to-face (OR = .97; p = .02) and internet treatment (OR = .97; p = .004), but was unrelated to interest in telephone administered treatment (p =.52).”
§ Interest in Behavioral and Psychological Treatments Delivered Face-to-Face, by Telephone and by Internet > Results > Predictors of Interest in Receiving Behavioral Services by Treatment Medium
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Interest in pain management treatment was more strongly predictive of interest in face-to-face treatment than telephone treatment (p=.007) and internet treatment (p=.02).”
§ Interest in Behavioral and Psychological Treatments Delivered Face-to-Face, by Telephone and by Internet > Results > Predictors of Interest in Receiving Behavioral Services by Treatment Medium
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Greater problems with cost as a barrier were significantly associated with greater interest in receiving treatment by telephone (OR=1.38, p=.006) and by internet (OR=1.45, p=.002) but not face-to-face (p = .30).”
§ Interest in Behavioral and Psychological Treatments Delivered Face-to-Face, by Telephone and by Internet > Results > Predictors of Interest in Receiving Behavioral Services by Treatment Medium
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, interest in mental health treatment is still strongly associated with greater desire for telephone delivered therapy, but is unrelated to internet delivery.”
§ Interest in Behavioral and Psychological Treatments Delivered Face-to-Face, by Telephone and by Internet > Discussion
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Interest in lifestyle change is more strongly related to desire for face-to-face delivery, but it is also positively related to acceptance of both telephone and internet delivered services.”
§ Interest in Behavioral and Psychological Treatments Delivered Face-to-Face, by Telephone and by Internet > Discussion
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In contrast, interest in internet delivery is currently only associated with interest in lifestyle change, and is not associated with interest in services for mental health, pain management or smoking cessation.”
§ Interest in Behavioral and Psychological Treatments Delivered Face-to-Face, by Telephone and by Internet > Discussion
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This suggests that there is openness to try newer treatment delivery media but not yet substantial demand.”
§ Interest in Behavioral and Psychological Treatments Delivered Face-to-Face, by Telephone and by Internet > Discussion
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Patients who returned the packets were younger (53.2±16.4 for those not returning, p<.01), less likely to be female (73.0% for those not returning, p<.001), and varied by ethnicity such that Caucasians were more likely to return surveys compared to African-Americans and Hispanics (return rates 24.5%, 18.3%, 11.3%, respectively, p<.001).”
§ Interest in Behavioral and Psychological Treatments Delivered Face-to-Face, by Telephone and by Internet > Results > Participants
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“From the 3265 mailings, 658 (20.1%) surveys were returned with signed consent documents.”
§ Interest in Behavioral and Psychological Treatments Delivered Face-to-Face, by Telephone and by Internet > Results > Participants
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The clinic, located in the heart of downtown Chicago, draws from a very urban population. These findings may not generalize to less urban or more rural settings.”
§ Interest in Behavioral and Psychological Treatments Delivered Face-to-Face, by Telephone and by Internet > Discussion
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The measurement included many non-standardized measures, particularly those evaluating level of interest in treatment and treatment delivery media.”
§ Interest in Behavioral and Psychological Treatments Delivered Face-to-Face, by Telephone and by Internet > Discussion
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While these relationships will likely change with time, these findings suggest at the time of this survey, interest in treatment for mental health and lifestyle change delivered by telephone may be acceptable to many patients, while interest in internet treatment is driven principally by interest in lifestyle change.”
§ Interest in Behavioral and Psychological Treatments Delivered Face-to-Face, by Telephone and by Internet > Discussion
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The three treatment delivery media examined in this study are not mutually exclusive.”
§ Interest in Behavioral and Psychological Treatments Delivered Face-to-Face, by Telephone and by Internet > Discussion
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The measurement of barriers focused on barriers to face-to-face care. Telephone and internet delivered treatments also likely present unique barriers that were not measured.”
§ Interest in Behavioral and Psychological Treatments Delivered Face-to-Face, by Telephone and by Internet > Discussion
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These findings will likely become less accurate as time goes on, given how quickly new telecommunications technologies are penetrating the population and being adopted as vehicles for delivering health and mental health care.”
§ Interest in Behavioral and Psychological Treatments Delivered Face-to-Face, by Telephone and by Internet > Discussion
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper relies on this without support.
Little is known about the acceptability of internet and telephone treatments, or what factors might influence patient interest in receiving treatments via these media.
“Little is known about the acceptability of internet and telephone treatments, or what factors might influence patient interest in receiving treatments via these media.”
“Little is known about the relative acceptability or level of interest in telephone- or internet-administered treatments, compared to traditional face-to-face delivered care.”
“There is also virtually no information on what creates, supports or diminishes interest in receiving treatments via these different delivery media.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The notion that telephone and internet treatments will overcome barriers is largely untested.
“This is potentially an important finding, in so far as the notion that the use of telephone and internet will overcome barriers is an assumption that remains largely untested (22).”
The paper relies on this without support.
The three treatment delivery media examined in this study are not mutually exclusive.
“The three treatment delivery media examined in this study are not mutually exclusive.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Another example is a study from the US conducted in a primary care setting, which showed that patients were less interested in taking part in ICBT than facetoface treatment 103 .”
From Internet-delivered psychological treatments: from innovation to implementation (2019) · cites this paper as [103]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Age and psychopathology were included as covariates in all models examining acceptability of iCBT, given their association with interest in Internet-based behavioral and psychological treatment (22, 26).”
From Improving Acceptability and Uptake Behavior for Internet-Based Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy (2021) · cites this paper as [22]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Mohr et al. reported a study on 658 primary care patients in the US who were asked about their interest in different treatment formats [21]. Results showed that 91% would consider face-to-face treatment and only 48% internet treatment.”
From The promise and pitfalls of the internet for cognitive behavioral therapy (2010) · cites this paper as [21]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“while clinicians may hold positive attitudes towards internet-delivered CBT a recent study suggested that patients are more skeptical and may prefer face-to-face treatment.”
From The promise and pitfalls of the internet for cognitive behavioral therapy (2010) · cites this paper as [21]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Previous studies have reported that many people prefer face-to-face therapy over E-MH programs [8-10], despite viewing online programs as having advantages such as convenience [8].”
From A brief intervention to increase uptake and adherence of an online program for depression and anxiety: Protocol for the Enhancing Engagement with Psychosocial Interventions (EEPI) Randomized Controlled Trial (2019) · cites this paper as [9]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“In a primary care sample, 94.3% of patients indicated interest in receiving face-to-face care in the clinic, and only 47.1% expressed interest in internet intervention.42”
From Pregnancy and the Acceptability of Computer-Based Versus Traditional Mental Health Treatments (2017) · cites this paper as [42]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“and that people prefer other forms of treatment over Internet-based therapy (22).”
From Improving Acceptability and Uptake Behavior for Internet-Based Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy (2021) · cites this paper as [22]
In the citing paper
“Acceptability of technology-based interventions may facilitate implementation in LMICs in contrast to high-income settings where providers and patients may be more wary (Mohr et al., 2010).”
From Mobile technology and task shifting to improve access to alcohol treatment services in Mozambique (2022) · cites this paper as Mohr et al., 2010
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ Interest in Behavioral and Psychological Treatments Delivered Face-to-Face, by Telephone and by Internet > Abstract > Results
“Symptom severity was unrelated to interest in treatment delivery medium.”
§ Interest in Behavioral and Psychological Treatments Delivered Face-to-Face, by Telephone and by Internet > Results > Predictors of Interest in Receiving Behavioral Services by Treatment Medium
“There was a significant differential effect between pain and interest medium (p = .046), with pain having a significantly greater negative effect on interest in face-to-face treatment compared to telephone delivered care.”
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ Interest in Behavioral and Psychological Treatments Delivered Face-to-Face, by Telephone and by Internet > Discussion
“however only small numbers (17.4% and 9.7% respectively) were definitely interested.”
§ Interest in Behavioral and Psychological Treatments Delivered Face-to-Face, by Telephone and by Internet > Results > Frequency of Treatment Target and Delivery Medium
“For telephone-administered care, 92 (18.7%) were definitely interested, 215 (43.7%) would consider it, and 180 (36.6%) were definitely not interested. For internet treatment, 57 (11.6%) were definitely interested”
Citations
Cites
The PHQ-9: Validity of a brief depression severity measure
Kroenke, K., Spitzer, R. L., & Williams, J. B. W. (2001) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x · Cited by 44,910
The PHQ-8 as a measure of current depression in the general population
Kroenke, K., Strine, T. W., Spitzer, R. L., Williams, J. B. W., Berry, J. T., & Mokdad, A. H. (2009) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2008.06.026 · Cited by 5,121 · cited 3×
“There were no significant differential effects for the PHQ-8, GAD-7, BMI or smoking status (ps > .29).”
MethodAnxiety disorders in primary care: prevalence, impairment, comorbidity, and detection
Kroenke, K., Spitzer, R. L., Williams, J. B. W., Monahan, P. O., & Löwe, B. (2007) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-146-5-200703060-00004 · Cited by 4,741 · cited 2×
“There were no significant differential effects for the PHQ-8, GAD-7, BMI or smoking status (ps > .29).”
Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice
(2021) · Clinical Psychology Science and Practice · doi:10.1111/(issn)1468-2850 · Cited by 3,683
Eysenbach, G. (2005) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.7.1.e11 · Cited by 2,524 · cited 1×
“Adherence to standalone internet delivered treatments (9,10) remains very low.”
BackgroundInternet-based cognitive behaviour therapy for symptoms of depression and anxiety: A meta-analysis
SPEK, V., CUIJPERS, P., NYKLÍČEK, I., RIPER, H., KEYZER, J., & POP, V. (2007) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291706008944 · Cited by 1,586 · cited 1×
“internet intervention for mental health has tended to show high attrition and comparatively small effect sizes (5,10).”
BackgroundClinical psychology: Science and practice.
Kazdin, A. E. (1994) · Clinical Psychology Science and Practice · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2850.1994.tb00001.x · Cited by 1,361
Adherence in Internet Interventions for Anxiety and Depression
Christensen, H., Griffiths, K. M., & Farrer, L. (2009) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.1194 · Cited by 1,133 · cited 2×
“internet intervention for mental health has tended to show high attrition and comparatively small effect sizes (5,10).”
BackgroundTate, D. F., Jackvony, E. H., & Wing, R. R. (2003) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.289.14.1833 · Cited by 666 · cited 1×
“Internet treatment for healthy lifestyle has also received growing validation (6,21).”
BackgroundTate, D. F., Jackvony, E. H., & Wing, R. R. (2006) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.166.15.1620 · Cited by 427
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–152 of 152
Molloy, A. G., & Anderson, P. L. (2021) · Telemedicine Journal and e-Health · doi:10.1089/tmj.2021.0393 · Cited by 9
“11,29 The type of iCBT was collapsed for main analyses by taking the sum of APOI and CEQ scores for self-guided and therapist-assisted iCBT, respectively.”
Internet-Based Cognitive Behavior Therapy for Social Anxiety Disorder
Hedman‐Lagerlöf, E., Botella, C., & Berger, T. (2016) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-06083-5_4 · Cited by 13
Teles, S., Ferreira, A., & Paúl, C. (2020) · Health & Social Care in the Community · doi:10.1111/hsc.13227 · Cited by 9
Wen, A., Wolitzky-Taylor, K. B., Gibbons, R. D., & Craske, M. G. (2023) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-023-07441-7 · Cited by 12
“clinician-delivered care alone may significantly improve these rates [97, 98].”
BackgroundMellentin, A. I., Behrendt, S., Bilberg, R., Blankers, M., Folker, M. P., Tarp, K., Uffelmann, J., & Nielsen, A. S. (2021) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/s12888-021-03122-4 · Cited by 9
College student preferences of telepsychiatry
Schuh, W. (2021) · Journal of American College Health · doi:10.1080/07448481.2021.1908305 · Cited by 6
Bright, K. S., Stuart, S. P., McNeil, D. A., Murray, L., & Kingston, D. E. (2022) · JMIR Formative Research · doi:10.2196/23879 · Cited by 7
“The use of face-to-face or person-to-person mental health programs is slightly preferred for those experiencing emotional and personal problems [61-64].”
BackgroundEllis, D. M., & Anderson, P. L. (2023) · JMIR Mental Health · doi:10.2196/43929 · Cited by 7
“In one study, 16% of non–treatment-seeking adults reported a willingness to consider using a digital mental health intervention to address a mental health concern [19], and another study reported that only 12% of participants were “definitely interested” in internet-based treatment [20].”
Portelli, P., & Eldred, C. (2017) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.07.034 · Cited by 7
“Findings reported in previous studies (e.g. Mohr et al, 2010; Rini et al, 2010) reveal that individuals often show an overwhelming preference for face-to-face therapies.”
ResultDainty, A. D., Fox, M., Lewis, N. R., Hunt, M. G., Holtham, E., Timmons, S., Kinsella, P., Wragg, A., & Callaghan, P. (2014) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005262 · Cited by 8
“A recent survey of 658 patients suggests that internet-delivered CBTwould be unacceptable to over 40% of those surveyed.(47) Other delivery mechanisms include group-based treatments,(42) although some authors”
BackgroundTeles, S., Ferreira, A., & Paúl, C. (2022) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2021.2021285 · Cited by 6
“…aligned with previous research from the e-mental health field (Casey, Wright, and Clough 2014; Klein and Cook 2010; Melville, Casey, and Kavanagh 2010; Mohr et al. 2010), should deserve additional attention as it represents the views of a digitally skilled sample of very frequent internet users.”
MethodSavir, T., & Baumel, A. (2025) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/77802 · Cited by 5
“In other studies, no association was found between symptom or distress severity and intervention preferences among primary care clinic visitors who were later approached online [9] or college students recruited online [11].”
InfluentialSasaki, N., Shimazu, T., Takeno, H., Ogawa, S., Sawada, U., Tsutsumi, A., & Imamura, K. (2024) · Pilot and Feasibility Studies · doi:10.1186/s40814-024-01481-9 · Cited by 5
“…the negative attitude of stakeholders (and, particularly, the users) for internet-based interventions (more preference for face-to-face) [29, 30] and require education for providers [31] Hybrid-type designed studies can be conducted between effectiveness studies and implementation research…”
BackgroundRomero, D., Johansson, M., Hermansson, U., & Lindner, P. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2021.730153 · Cited by 5
“Several studies have investigated the general public’s (25, 26), stakeholders’ (27), clinicians’ (28–30) and different patient populations’ (31, 32) attitudes toward internet interventions, yet only a handful of studies have investigated whether users’ attitudes at treatment entry affect outcome.”
BackgroundShepardson, R. L., Buckheit, K. A., & Funderburk, J. S. (2021) · Families Systems & Health · doi:10.1037/fsh0000628 · Cited by 7
Townsend, A. N., Hertz, A. G., D’Souza, J. M., & Wiese, A. D. (2022) · Advances in Psychiatry and Behavioral Health · doi:10.1016/j.ypsc.2022.05.003 · Cited by 4
Psychological Issues in Head and Neck Cancer
Stout, R. A., Beckman, N. J., Shelby, S. R., & Labott, S. M. (2013) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-5827-8_25 · Cited by 4
“A recent study demonstrated the usefulness of an internet-based intervention for depressed individuals [ 260 ] , and research is now focusing on methods to implement smart phone technology to assist patients with management of psychological symptoms [ 261 ].”
MethodPotential pitfalls and lessons learned
KAY‐LAMBKIN, F. J., Heinsch, M., & Sampson, D. L. (2022) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-323-90045-4.00013-7 · Cited by 2
Évolution sociétale de la sexualité
Cour, F. (2013) · The French Journal of Urology · doi:10.1016/j.purol.2013.03.015 · Cited by 3
Psychology and Population Health Management
Peterson, A. L., Raj, J. J., & Lancaster, C. L. (2014) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-09817-3_1 · Cited by 3
Lan, T., Zhao, F., & Xiong, B. (2020) · Ear Nose & Throat Journal · doi:10.1177/0145561320973768 · Cited by 3
Su, R. J., Wang, R., Li, Z., Wang, Y., Zhao, X., Sun, Y., Ni, J., Zhu, Y., Luan, J., Tian, G., et al. (2025) · International Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1007/s10147-025-02875-2 · Cited by 2
“Our findings align with other studies, for instance, Mohr et al. proposed that in terms of psychotherapy, the participants of face-to-face intervention mode had higher participation and enthusiasm, which might lead to better effects of the face-to-face intervention [100].”
Klein, J. P., Berger, T., Hautzinger, M., Lutz, W., Rose, M., Späth, C., Schröder, J., Hohagen, F., & Moritz, S. (2019) · Fortschritte der Neurologie · Psychiatrie · doi:10.1055/a-0849-9838 · Cited by 2
Mindfulness-Based Interventions for Patients with Cancer
Porter, L. S., & Gremore, T. M. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-85702-8_20 · Cited by 2
Holland, D., Moe, J. L., Schwitzer, A. M. “., Pribesh, S. L., & Franklin, J. (2023) · Telemedicine Reports · doi:10.1089/tmr.2021.0011 · Cited by 2
“15,16 Participant autonomy provided confidence in their pursuit of education and training to gain a level of proficiency that the National Board for Certified Counselors (NBCC) describes as, ‘‘qualified by education and experience’’ (Standard 1).”
BackgroundMichaelis, M., Burgess, S., Junne, F., Rothermund, E., Gündel, H., Zipfel, S., Wolf, M., & Rieger, M. A. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2021.508622 · Cited by 4
Web-based stress management for preventing stress and reducing sick leave in workers
Kuster, A. T., Dalsbø, T. K., Thanh, Y. B. L., Agarwal, A., & Durand-Moreau, Q. V. (2015) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd011899 · Cited by 2
An Online Mindfulness Intervention for Pain and Wellbeing
Leov, J. (2016) · Otago University Research Archive (University of Otago) · Cited by 2
Rachyla, I., Mor, S., Botella, C., Castilla, D., & Quero, S. (2022) · Frontiers in Virtual Reality · doi:10.3389/frvir.2022.931366 · Cited by 1
“This result is partially supported by the existing literature which suggests that individuals interested in receiving psychological intervention tend to show greater preference for face-to-face interventions (Mohr et al., 2010).”
BackgroundResultPerceptions of online lifestyle counseling among individuals living in rural India
Laxmi, V., Sharma, S., Singh, A. K., et al. (2014) · Technology and Health Care · doi:10.3233/thc-140837 · Cited by 1
“The number of reasons attributed to it includes poor access to online facilities, lack of expertise in utilization, costs, insufficient feedback, convenience, time constraints or preference of face to face communication [5].”
InfluentialKamarsu, S., & Anderson, P. L. (2024) · Procedia Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2024.10.365 · Cited by 1
Public Services Through Multi-Channel Issues and Challenges
Velamala, R. R. (2017) · Advances in e-business research series · doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-5026-6.ch014 · Cited by 1
Improving the acceptability of internet-based cognitive-behavioral therapy among Black Americans.
Ellis, D. M., & Anderson, P. L. (2021) · Technology Mind and Behavior · doi:10.1037/tmb0000044 · Cited by 1
Systems engineering models for signature injuries of modern military conflicts
Muşdal, H. (2013) · doi:10.17760/d20003343 · Cited by 1
Ellis, D. M., & Anderson, P. L. (2020) · Technology Mind and Behavior · doi:10.1037/tmb0000044.supp · Cited by 1
Gulliver, A., Calear, A., Sunderland, M., Kay-Lambkin, F. J., Farrer, L., Banfield, M., & Batterham, P. (2019) · doi:10.2196/preprints.16107 · Cited by 1
Telephone delivered interventions for reducing morbidity and mortality in people with HIV infection
van-Velthoven, M. H., Car, L. T., & Car, J. (2011) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd009189 · Cited by 1
Berman, M. I., Buckey, J. C., Hull, J. G., Linardatos, E., Song, S. L., Cartreine, J. A., McLellan, R. K., & Hegel, M. T. (2013) · Behavior Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.beth.2013.12.008
Lewis, N. R., Holtham, E., Timmons, S., Wragg, A., & Callaghan, P. (2014)
Internet-based cognitive behavioural therapy
Høifødt, R. S. (2015)
Holland, D. (2016) · ODU Digital Commons (Old Dominion University) · doi:10.25777/9m8h-gn42
“…and comfort, which echoes the literature that indicates various populations of perspective clients, telephone and Internet-based interactions, are in some cases preferred by clients over in person interactions (Mohr et al., 2010; Berger, Casper, Richardson, Kneubhler, Sutter & Andersson, 2011).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSalazar, B. C. (2013) · Digital Commons - DU (University of Denver)
Rachyla, I. (2019) · Tesis Doctorals en Xarxa (Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya) · doi:10.6035/14109.2019.234380
Laing, J., Linke, S., Pogue, S., Sweeney, E., Husain, M. I., & Lewis, G. (2019) · JMIR Formative Research · doi:10.2196/14159
New technologies applied as alternative approaches in averting depression
Blithe Group, Ngabo-Woods, H., Instituto ITACA, U. P. D. V., Cuesta, S. A., Garcia-Gomez, J. M., & Instituto ITACA, U. P. D. V. (2017) · doi:10.46844/bri.17.00001.1
Holmdahl, J., & Rydell, M. (2011) · KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology)
Young, C., Rocks, T., Opie, R., Berk, M., & O'Neil, A. E. (2022) · Psychiatric Annals · doi:10.3928/00485713-20220126-02
Gurcan, H. Y., Couturier, J. L., Matheson, B. E., Jo, B., & Lock, J. (2024) · Contemporary Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/j.cct.2024.107618 · Cited by 1
Qu, H., Song, B., Yang, L., & Liu, J. (2025) · The Tohoku Journal of Experimental Medicine · doi:10.1620/tjem.2025.j030
Therapeutic Alliance in Online Systemic Therapy: An Exploratory Research
Trotta, B., Racerro, G., & Mosconi, A. (2025) · European Family Therapy Association series · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-92225-1_3
Palmili, L. (2013) · UPT. Syiah Kuala University Library (Syiah Kuala University)
Metadata
- Authors
- Mohr, D. C., Siddique, J., Ho, J., Duffecy, J., Jin, L., & Fokuo, J. K.
- Affiliations
- Northwestern University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Mohr, David C.
- Venue
- Annals of Behavioral Medicine
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2010-07-21
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 89-98
- ISSN
- 0742-5554 (ISSN-L)
- 0883-6612
- 1532-4796
- PMC
- PMC2914835
- OpenAlex
- W1973720661
- Cited by
- 154
- References
- 26
- Citations by year
- 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 13.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Annals of Behavioral Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Mental Health (R34MH078922, R01MH059708)
- National Center for Research Resources (UL1RR025741)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Mental Health Treatment and Access
- Keywords
- internet-delivered treatment, face-to-face treatment, treatment acceptability, primary care patients, lifestyle intervention, psychotherapy, pain management, tobacco use, time constraints, barriers to treatment access
- MeSH terms
- Anxiety, Behavior Therapy, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Motivation, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Psychotherapy, Severity of Illness Index, Telephone, Therapy, Computer-Assisted, Internet
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-09-28, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-09-28 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
