Cited by 24Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsDigital Mental Health Interventions

Mobile technology and task shifting to improve access to alcohol treatment services in Mozambique

Open access
O'Grady, Megan A., Mootz, Jennifer, Suleman, Antonio, Sweetland, Annika, Teodoro, Eugénia, Anube, Anibal, Feliciano, Paulino, Bezuidenhout, Charl +7 more·2022·Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment

Abstract

Introduction Unhealthy alcohol use (UAU) is a major public health challenge, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. Mozambique is the fourth poorest country in the world where half of the population lives below the poverty line. UAU is frequent among drinkers in Mozambique; however, resources and infrastructure to treat UAU are very limited. This paper examines how task-shifting and a provider-facing mobile health application are being used to improve access to care. In this paper, the feasibility, acceptability and appropriateness of a provider-facing mobile health application being used under a task-shifting model to identify UAU and provide a four-session brief motivational interviewing intervention are described. Method The study used a sequential exploratory mixed-methods design with a QUAL → quan structure. First, 15 psychiatric technicians and primary care providers in Mozambique’s Nampula Province participated in semi-structured interviews. These interviews were recorded and transcribed. Then, 45 providers completed a 12-item quantitative survey on tablets. Quantitative analysis used descriptive statistic calculation and qualitative analysis used thematic analysis. Results Nonspecialized providers found the mobile health app to be acceptable, appropriate, and feasible when delivering a 4-session brief motivational intervention under a task-shifting model. Central benefits of the technology were enhanced standardization and efficiency of sessions as well as feelings of legitimacy when interacting with patients. Main concerns were feasibility of implementing the intervention due to time constraints of workload and internet connectivity issues. Conclusions Provider-facing technology shows promise in supporting task-shifting models that can expand alcohol intervention services and increase access to care in low- and middle-income countries. Providers without specialized training in behavioral health interventions can provide critical services to patients with UAU and provider-facing mobile health applications may help bring such models to scale.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This mixed-methods study examined how Mozambican nonspecialist providers viewed a tablet-based, provider-facing app for alcohol screening and a four-session brief intervention under task shifting. Providers generally rated the app as acceptable, appropriate, and feasible, while workload time and internet connectivity were the main concerns.

Key findings

  • Among 15 interviewed and 45 surveyed psychiatric technicians and primary care providers in Nampula Province, the mSBIRT app scored highly: acceptability mean 4.33/5, appropriateness mean 4.22/5, and feasibility mean 4.17/5.
  • Qualitative themes highlighted greater session efficiency through automated screening and structured guidance, a positive user experience, useful visual content for patient discussions, and increased feelings of legitimacy and standardization when providers used the app with patients.
  • Concerns included time pressures from 30–60-minute sessions, too many or repetitive questions, small screen text, app slowness, and unreliable internet/data access, especially in rural areas; offline use was partial, but the app needed network access at session start to sync prior information.
  • On the feasibility scale, 91% agreed or completely agreed that the app seemed easy to use, although this was one of the lowest-scoring quantitative items.

Methods

  • Sequential exploratory mixed-methods design with greater weight on qualitative data (QUAL → quan). First, 15 purposively selected trained providers completed semi-structured phone interviews, with 6 follow-up interviews for participant checking and saturation; qualitative data were analyzed with thematic analysis.
  • A 12-item quantitative survey was administered on tablets via Redcap to 45 providers, representing about 75% of trained PCPs and PTs in the region. It used three validated implementation outcome scales—acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility—on a 5-point Likert scale, analyzed with descriptive statistics.
  • The study took place in Nampula Province, Mozambique, among providers trained in SBIRT who had used the mSBIRT app; IRB approvals were obtained from the Mozambican Ministry of Health and the last author’s institution.

Limitations

  • The paper states that the parent study was in early implementation, providers had used the app for only several months, and longer-term follow-up is needed to assess perceptions over time.
  • The paper states possible social desirability bias despite anonymity assurances, exclusion of community health workers, and possible selection bias because the self-administered tablet survey may have favored providers comfortable with and approving of technology.
  • The paper also notes the need for patient-perspective research; the text makes evident that the qualitative sample was small and mostly male, while the quantitative sample was mostly female, and no patient outcomes were reported.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jsat.2021.108549

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 50 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingown data

    App appropriateness was very positive, with a scale mean of 4.22 out of 5.

    “Appropriateness scale scores are presented in Table 3 and indicate very positive views on app appropriateness (scale mean = 4.22/5).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Participants were very satisfied with the app.

    “Generally, participants were very satisfied with the app.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Providers agreed that the app is feasible to use, with a scale mean of 4.17 out of 5.

    “Feasibility scale scores are presented in Table 3 and indicate that providers agreed that the app is feasible to use (scale mean = 4.17/5).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    App acceptability was high, with a scale mean of 4.33 out of 5.0.

    “Table 3 displays quantitative scores on acceptability by item and for the full scale, which indicate that app acceptability was high (scale mean = 4.33/5.0).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Two factors affected views on app feasibility: time pressures and wifi network connection.

    “Two factors affected views on app feasibility in the qualitative data: time pressures and wifi network connection.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims. 44
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 42
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Language was the most commonly discussed adaptation, and for some patients, providers had to translate into the local language, adding time and complexity to the app session.

    “In terms of adaptations, participants most commonly discussed language.”
    • Also stated in: § App appropriateness · plain
      “For some patients, providers had to translate into the local language, adding time and complexity to the app session.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The app is in Portuguese to match the national language, but 11 local languages are used throughout the country.
    • Rests on an assumption: Portuguese may be a second language for both providers and patients, and some providers may not speak the same local language as their patients.
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The app was a good match for providers to do SBIRT/MI, provided a guide or script, and was highly relevant due to the high rate of unhealthy alcohol use cases.

    “Participants for the most part indicated that the app was a good match for them to do SBIRT/MI.”
    • Also stated in: § App appropriateness · plain
      “They felt the app provided a guide or script for the intervention.”
    • Also stated in: § App appropriateness · plain
      “Participants also thought that the app was highly relevant to their work because of the high rate of UAU cases.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    The app provides for an efficient session because of the automated calculation of the screening tool and its structured resources.

    “Several participants noted that the app provides for an efficient session because of the automated calculation of the screening tool and its structured resources.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Qualitative analysis identified themes for acceptability (efficiency, experience, design/content), appropriateness (patient-provider rapport, match with SBIRT process and goals, adapting to local needs), and feasibility (time pressures and wifi connection).

    “Below, quantitative results are presented along with the themes identified for each of the three inductively coded qualitative categories: 1) Acceptability (efficiency, experience, design/content), 2) Appropriateness (patient-provider rapport, match with SBIRT process and goals, adapting to local needs, and 3) Feasibility (time pressures and wifi connection).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Participants were mostly satisfied with the app content and felt it helped with patient interactions, with useful visual displays and screens facilitating discussion about readiness to change and behavior change plans.

    “Participants were mostly satisfied with the app content and felt it helped with patient interactions.”
    • Also stated in: § App acceptability · plain
      “Several participants identified screens with useful visual displays that can be used with the patient, including screens that show images of the amount of alcohol used by the patient, recommended drinking levels, and the connections between alcohol and physical health.”
    • Also stated in: § App acceptability · plain
      “Screens that facilitated a discussion about readiness to change as well as behavior change plans also increased acceptability.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Some participants noted less acceptable factors: too small letters on the screen, slowness of the app, difficulty of patients being able to accurately express quantity of drinking, and questions that felt repetitive or too numerous.

    “Though, some participants noted factors that were less acceptable, including too small letters on the screen, slowness of the app, difficulty of patients being able to accurately express quantity of drinking, and questions that felt repetitive or too numerous.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The app added time to already busy workflows for some providers, and feasibility would depend on the work flow.

    “Related to time pressures, participants felt that feasibility “would depend on the work flow” (Participant 10).”
    • Also stated in: § App feasibility · plain
      “The app added time to already busy workflows for some providers, as illustrated here: The app is good, but if some aspects were improved, such as minimizing questions and time. Looking at the flow because for us who do everything in our health units, it is complicated to have to be with a patient for an hour or an hour and a half(Participant 14).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    Participants reported a good user experience with the app, which they attributed to its organization and practice after training.

    “Participants generally reported that the app provided a good user experience.”
    • Also stated in: § App acceptability · plain
      “Participants felt that the application was well organized which contributed to the positive user experience.”
    • Also stated in: § App acceptability · hedged
      “A few participants noted that they practiced using the app after training which increased its appeal over time.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Participants reported that using a standardized tool like the app enhanced patient comfort and provider legitimacy, and that ensuring data security was important for rapport.

    “Participants also expressed that when patients observe that they are using a standardized tool to deliver the intervention, patients feel more comfortable and that perhaps the app also provides legitimacy as a task-shared worker in the eyes of the patient.”
    • Also stated in: § App appropriateness · plain
      “Several participants also noted that it was important for maintaining rapport to be sure the patient understood that their data and answers were secure within the app and that privacy protections were in place.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Participants, particularly those in rural areas, lack strong network connections and depend on data packages that are not always available.

    “Regarding internet connections, participants, especially those located in rural areas, do not have strong network connections and rely on data packages that are not available at all times.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Constructive feedback indicated that although the app enhanced the efficiency of screening and diagnosis, the number of questions and prompts was at times tedious.

    “Constructive feedback indicated that although the app enhanced efficiency of screening and diagnosis, the number of questions and prompts was at times tedious.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The vast majority of participants agreed that the mSBIRT app was acceptable, appropriate, and feasible.

    “Our results showed that the vast majority of participants agreed that the mSBIRT app was acceptable, appropriate, and feasible.”
    • Also stated in: § Conclusions · plain
      “Nonspecialized providers found the mSBIRT app to be acceptable, appropriate, and feasible.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Providers appreciated the improved standardization of the intervention and thought it matched well with the SBIRT process they had learned in training without the app.

    “Providers additionally appreciated the improved standardization of the intervention and thought it matched well with the SBIRT process they learned in training without the mSBIRT app.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Increased efficiency, experience, and design/content were all related to providers' views of the acceptability of mSBIRT.

    “Increased efficiency, experience, and design/content all related to providers’ views of acceptability of mSBIRT.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The mSBIRT app can be used offline for parts of the intervention and synchronizes when service is available, but it must connect to the network at the start of a session to match data with the server and supply information from previous sessions.

    “While the app can be used offline during some parts of the intervention and will synchronize when service is available, it must connect to the network to match data with the server at the start the session to provide useful information from previous sessions (e.g., change in alcohol use).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Providers perceived the app to facilitate screening procedures and to make the intervention more efficient.

    “Providers perceived the app to facilitate screening procedures, making the intervention more efficient.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Providers in Mozambique shared concerns about maintaining rapport and about the importance of introducing the app to patients that were similar to those in the original mSBIRT study conducted in the US.

    “While we found that providers in Mozambique shared similar concerns about maintaining rapport and the importance of introducing the app to patients as in the original mSBIRT study conducted in the US (O’Grady et al., 2019), they often mentioned patients’ satisfaction with the tablet and app.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites O’Grady et al., 2019 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductcitation

    Inter-rater reliability was not calculated because the main purpose was to yield concepts and themes rather than finite coding agreement, consistent with accepted qualitative conventions.

    “According to accepted conventions in qualitative methods, inter-rater reliability was not calculated because our main purpose was to eventually yield concepts and themes, rather than finite coding agreement (McDonald et al., 2019).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites McDonald et al., 2019

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim, and translated into English for coding.

    “Interviews were recorded and then transcribed verbatim and translated into English for coding.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    The study received IRB approval from the Mozambican Ministry of Health and the last author's institution.

    “This study received IRB approval from the Mozambican Ministry of Health (Protocol # CIBS/FM/HCM/64/2017) as well as the last author’s institution (Protocol #7485).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductcitation

    The 12-item quantitative survey consisted of three validated scales (Acceptability of Intervention Measure, Intervention Appropriateness Measure, Feasibility of Intervention Measure) measured on a 5-point Likert scale.

    “The 12-item quantitative survey consisted of three validated scales (Acceptability of Intervention Measure, Intervention Appropriateness Measure, Feasibility of Intervention Measure)(Weiner et al., 2017) measured on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = completely disagree, 5 = completely agree).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Weiner et al., 2017 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    All participants invited to the qualitative study participated.

    “All participants invited to the qualitative study participated.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductcitation

    Qualitative analysis used Thematic Analysis.

    “Qualitative analysis used Thematic Analysis (Braun & Clarke, 2021).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Braun & Clarke, 2021 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductcitation

    Thematic Analysis generally followed phases outlined by Nowell et al., 2017, including familiarizing with data, generating initial codes, searching for themes, and reviewing, defining, and naming themes.

    “Thematic Analysis generally followed phases outlined by Nowell et al., 2017, including familiarizing ourselves with the data, generating initial codes, searching for themes, and reviewing, defining, and naming themes (Nowell et al., 2017).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Nowell et al., 2017 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Interviewers had previous interactions with participants from other research activities currently underway.

    “Interviewers have had some previous interactions with participants from other research activities currently underway (e.g., trainings, app technical support, other data collection).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Qualitative interview participants were purposively selected because they were trained in SBIRT and used the mSBIRT application.

    “Qualitative interview participants were purposively selected because they were trained in SBIRT and used the mSBIRT application.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Deductive coding was first used based on established definitions of acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility; then the team searched for, identified, named, and selected representative quotations for themes within each category.

    “In this process, deductive coding was first utilized based on established definitions of acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility. Then, once data was deductively coded into each one of these larger categories (e.g., feasibility), the team searched for themes within each coded category, identified and named these themes (e.g., time pressures) and selected representative quotations for each”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Although task-shifting has increased availability of mental health services, there is limited system capacity to bring evidence-based interventions for unhealthy alcohol use to scale.

    “While this strategy has increased availability of mental health services, there is limited system capacity to bring evidence-based interventions for UAU to scale (Halsted et al., 2019; Suleman et al., in press; Wainberg et al., 2020).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Halsted et al., 2019 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Suleman et al., in press

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Wainberg et al., 2020

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Mozambique is the fourth poorest country in the world, with half the population below the poverty line and 70% living in rural areas with limited healthcare access.

    “Mozambique is the fourth poorest country in the world where half of the population lives below the poverty line and 70% live in rural areas with limited healthcare access (World Bank, 2016; Pasquali, 2020; Schwitters et al., 2015).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites World Bank, 2016

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Pasquali, 2020

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Schwitters et al., 2015

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductcitation

    Instrument translation into Portuguese and cultural adaptation used WHO-recommended methods, including forward and backward translation by bilingual experts, cognitive pre-testing with 10 providers, and consensus finalization.

    “Instrument translation into Portuguese and culturally adaptation used methods recommended by the WHO (WHO, n.d.), including forward and backward translation by bilingual experts, cognitive pre-testing with 10 PTs and PCPs, and finalization of language through consensus.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites WHO, n.d.

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    The study draws from recent recommendations in the implementation science literature on characterizing implementation outcomes for behavioral intervention technology.

    “The study draws from recent recommendations in the implementation science literature on characterizing implementation outcomes for behavioral intervention technology (Hermes et al., 2019).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Hermes et al., 2019 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Unhealthy alcohol use is a major public health challenge, particularly in low- and middle-income countries where disease burden per liter of alcohol consumed is greater than in high-income countries.

    “Unhealthy alcohol use (UAU), defined as a continuum of behaviors from risky or harmful use (exceeding recommended daily, weekly, or per occasion amounts) to alcohol use disorder, is a major public health challenge, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) where disease burden per liter of alcohol consumed is greater than in high-income countries (Rehm et al., 2009).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Rehm et al., 2009 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    The first author conducted initial theme identification, which was then reviewed and finalized by the full qualitative analysis team through discussion.

    “The first author conducted the initial identification of themes which were then reviewed and finalized by the full qualitative analysis team through discussion.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Evaluations of trainings for primary care practitioners and psychiatric technicians show effective knowledge transfer for the SBIRT/MI intervention and strong intentions to deliver its core components with fidelity.

    “Evaluation of these trainings for PCPs and PTs show effective knowledge transfer for the SBIRT/MI intervention and strong intentions to deliver its core components with fidelity (Wainberg et al., 2021).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Wainberg et al., 2021 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    A recent study found that among approximately 500 patients screened for mental health and substance use, 16% had likely substance use disorder.

    “A recent study showed that of approximately 500 patients screened for mental health and substance use, 16% were identified with likely substance use disorder (Wainberg et al., 2021).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Wainberg et al., 2021 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    From 2010 to 2014, the number of psychiatric technicians grew from 66 to 241, allowing Mozambique to increase mental health coverage from 60 districts (44%) to all 135 districts (100%).

    “From 2010 to 2014, the number of PTs grew from 66 to 241 allowing Mozambique to increase coverage from 60 (44%) to all 135 (100%) districts in the country (dos Santos et al., 2016).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites dos Santos et al., 2016 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductcitation

    Analysis used an iterative process with preliminary qualitative analysis, follow-up interviews with 6 of the original 15 interviewees for participant checking and additional in-depth questions, and data saturation.

    “Analysis used an iterative process where preliminary analysis of the qualitative data was conducted and then follow up interviews were completed with 6 of the original 15 interviewees to conduct participant checking and ask additional in-depth questions about topics that arose during the initial interviews in order to reach data saturation (Saunders et al., 2018).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Saunders et al., 2018 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    The three-person analysis team consisted of the first and second authors (PhD-level social and clinical psychologists and faculty trained in qualitative methods) and a bilingual research assistant trained in qualitative coding.

    “The three-person analysis team consisted of the first and second author, PhD-level social and clinical psychologists respectively, who are also faculty members at academic medical centers and trained in qualitative methods, as well as a bilingual (Portuguese/English) research assistant trained by the study team in qualitative coding.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    The WHO mhGAP Guidelines recommend using Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) to reduce unhealthy alcohol use.

    “The WHO Mental Health Gap Action Programme Guidelines (mhGAP)(Dua et al., 2011; WHO, 2008a) recommend using Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) (Babor & Higgins-Biddle, 2001) to reduce UAU.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Dua et al., 2011 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites WHO, 2008a

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Resources and infrastructure to treat unhealthy alcohol use in Mozambique are limited, with 75-90% of people with behavioral health issues receiving no care due to provider scarcity and geographic distribution.

    “However, resources and infrastructure to treat UAU in Mozambique are limited; 75–90% of people with behavioral health issues receive no care because of provider scarcity and geographic distribution (Demyttenaere et al., 2004; dos Santos et al., 2016; Dua et al., 2011).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Demyttenaere et al., 2004 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites dos Santos et al., 2016 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Dua et al., 2011 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Mobile health technology is a promising but understudied tool to support providers and supervisors under task-shifting models.

    “Mobile health technology is a promising but understudied tool to support providers and supervisors under task-shifting models (Naslund et al., 2019; Triplett et al., 2021).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Naslund et al., 2019 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Triplett et al., 2021 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    The World Health Organization recommends task-shifting, in which non-specialists are trained to deliver brief evidence-based interventions with expert clinical supervision, to overcome the global shortage of mental health specialists.

    “One of the key strategies recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO) to overcome the global shortage of mental health specialists involves “task-shifting,” wherein non-specialists (e.g., community health workers) are trained to deliver brief evidence-based interventions with expert clinical supervision (WHO, 2016).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites WHO, 2016

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductcitation

    The study used a sequential exploratory mixed-methods design with greater weight given to qualitative data (QUAL → quan).

    “This study used a sequential exploratory mixed-methods design where more weight was given to the qualitative data (QUAL → quan)(Creswell et al., 2003).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Creswell et al., 2003

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Meta-data about provider usage of the app can be used to monitor the length and content of sessions and to identify deviations in expected delivery that can prompt corrective feedback.

    “For example, meta-data about provider usage of the app can be used to monitor length and content of sessions and identify deviations in expected delivery (e.g., amount of time spent on each screen) that can prompt corrective feedback.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The provider-facing mHealth approach for supporting task-shifted workers may be applicable to other therapeutic approaches and evidence-based practices.

    “Our provider-facing mHealth approach for supporting task-shifted workers may be applicable to other therapeutic approaches and evidence-based practices.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    A script was included at the beginning of the survey and interview reminding providers that their responses would be anonymous and not used to evaluate professional merit.

    “To preemptively address this possibility, a script was included at the beginning of the survey and interview that reminded providers that their responses would be anonymous and not used in any way to evaluate professional merit.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    The quantitative questions were self-administered via redcap on the tablets, and this method may have selected for providers most comfortable with and approving of technology.

    “Finally, the quantitative questions were self-administered via redcap on the tablets. It is possible that this method selected for providers most comfortable with and approving of technology.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    In most African countries, less than 1% of the national budget is allocated to behavioral health services.

    “In most African countries, less than 1% of the national budget is allocated for behavioral health services (Rathod et al., 2017).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Rathod et al., 2017

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    The parent study is in early stages of app implementation and providers had been using the app in the field for only several months.

    “The parent study is in early stages of app implementation and providers have only been using the app for several months in the field.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Exposure to wars, food insecurity, poverty, and other social determinants is highly prevalent in low- and middle-income countries and negatively affects people's behavioral health.

    “Exposure to wars, food insecurity, poverty, and other social determinants are highly prevalent in LMICs and negatively affect people’s behavioral health (Lund et al., 2018).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Lund et al., 2018 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    A synthesis of qualitative studies of health workers' perceptions of digital interventions found that increased efficiency fundamentally changed how health workers provided care.

    “A synthesis of qualitative studies that examined health workers’ perceptions of using digital interventions found that increased efficiency fundamentally changed the way health workers provided care (Odendaal et al., 2020).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Odendaal et al., 2020

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The mostly positive endorsement of the app could suggest that social desirability biases were at play.

    “Yet, the mostly positive endorsement of the app could suggest social desirability biases at play.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    In the context of task-shifting, the app may have increased providers' feelings that they appear more legitimate in conducting UAU interventions, which may in turn increase provider satisfaction and patient confidence in the intervention.

    “It appeared that in the context of task-shifting, that the app may have increased providers’ feelings that they appear more legitimate in conducting UAU interventions, which may lead to greater feelings of satisfaction for the provider and increased confidence in the intervention for the patient.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Using mHealth has the potential to greatly improve fidelity and clinical performance in the delivery of UAU interventions and to monitor adoption by providers under real-world conditions.

    “Using mHealth has the potential to greatly improve fidelity and clinical performance in the delivery of UAU interventions and monitor adoption by providers under real world conditions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In Mozambique, a religious insurgency in the province directly north of Nampula, the site of this study, has escalated, displacing over 674,000 civilians, many of whom relocated to Nampula, and killing 2,000 civilians.

    “In Mozambique, a religious insurgency in the province directly north of Nampula, the site of this study, has escalated. Over 674,000 civilians have been displaced, many of whom have relocated to Nampula, and 2,000 civilians have been killed (Goldbaum et al., 2021).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Goldbaum et al., 2021

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    A qualitative study in rural Nepal found that although providers tended to have low digital literacy, they supported including mobile health technology to facilitate services.

    “A qualitative study in rural Nepal also found that although providers tended to have low digital literacy, they supported inclusion of mobile health technology to facilitate services (Angdembe et al., 2017).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Angdembe et al., 2017 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The app's need for network connection at session start may create feasibility challenges for some participants and require that providers understand online and offline functions.

    “This may present challenges for some participants in terms of feasibility and making sure providers understand online and offline functions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Technology that capitalizes on task-shifting models to expand alcohol treatment services and increase reach in low- and middle-income countries shows great promise, though it is nascent.

    “While nascent, technology that capitalizes on task-shifting models to expand alcohol treatment services and increase reach in LMICs shows great promise.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Community health workers in low- and middle-income countries are frequently paid little or no salary, and providers are often given increased responsibilities without compensation for the additional work.

    “CHWs in LMICs are frequently paid little or no salary and often providers are tasked with increased responsibilities and not compensated for the additional work (Bhardwaj et al., 2020).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Bhardwaj et al., 2020 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Concerns about loss or damage of devices and lack of network connection are challenges frequently documented in other studies in low- and middle-income countries.

    “Concerns about loss or damage of devices and lack of network connection are challenges frequently documented in other LMIC studies (Bhardwaj et al., 2020; Merchant et al., 2020).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Bhardwaj et al., 2020 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Merchant et al., 2020 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Acceptability of technology-based interventions may facilitate implementation in low- and middle-income countries, in contrast to high-income settings where providers and patients may be more wary.

    “Acceptability of technology-based interventions may facilitate implementation in LMICs in contrast to high-income settings where providers and patients may be more wary (Mohr et al., 2010).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Mohr et al., 2010 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Human-centered designs are known to increase the acceptability and relevance of technology.

    “This approach is consistent with human-centered designs known to increase acceptability and relevance of technology (Triplett et al., 2021).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Triplett et al., 2021 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Because nonspecialized providers work for the public health system in which the implementation study is integrated, social desirability could have influenced their responses to the quantitative surveys and qualitative interviews.

    “Moreover, because nonspecialized providers work for the public health system in which this implementation study is being integrated, social desirability could have influenced their responses to the quantitative surveys and qualitative interviews.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
63 of 63
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Training non-specialist workers to deliver alcohol interventions can be an effective and cost-effective way to increase access to care.

    “Mounting evidence suggests that training non-specialist workers to deliver alcohol interventions can be an effective and cost-effective way to increase access to care.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The app is in Portuguese to match the national language, but 11 local languages are used throughout the country.

    “The app is in Portuguese to match the national language. However, 11 local languages are used throughout the country.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Portuguese may be a second language for both providers and patients, and some providers may not speak the same local language as their patients.

    “Portuguese may be a second language for both providers and patients and some providers may not speak the same local language as their patients.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Mozambique was one of the first countries in the world to formalize task-shifting within their national health platform.

    “Mozambique was one of the first countries in the world to formalize task-shifting within their national health platform.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    In low- and middle-income countries, investment in physical health is often prioritized over behavioral health.

    “In LMICs, investment in physical health is often prioritized over behavioral health.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Task-shifting services present an opportunity for increased reach for those without access to care.

    “While task-shifting services presents opportunity for increased reach for those without access to care, tasks of service provision are often shifted to healthcare and community providers who are simultaneously pulled into facilitating care for multiple government and community-based programs.”
6 of 6

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • O'Grady et al reported that the provider-facing app ensured an efficient BI session.

    “O’Grady et al. [100] reported that the provider-facing app ensured an efficient BI session (Table 2).”

    From A scoping review of substance use brief interventions in Africa (2024) · cites this paper as [100]

    In Results > App acceptability, providers said the app helped make sessions efficient through automated screening calculations and structured resources. The paper reports providers’ perceptions, not that the app ensured an efficient brief-intervention session; Results > App feasibility also notes that it added time for some providers. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • One intervention was delivered using a provider-facing mobile health app.

    “One intervention was delivered using a provider-facing mobile health app[100] (Table 2).”
  • In Mozambique, the brief intervention mobile health application had high acceptability (scale mean = 4.33/5.0), appropriateness (scale mean = 4.22/5), and feasibility (scale mean = 4.17/5).

    “app acceptability (scale mean = 4.33/5.0); app appropriateness (scale mean = 4.22/5); app feasibility vb (scale mean = 4.17/5).”
  • In Mozambique, healthcare workers felt the app provided an efficient session due to automated calculation of the screening tool and structured resources, provided a good user experience, helped with patient interactions, and was a good match for doing the BI.

    “the HCWs felt that the app provided for an efficientsession because of the automated calculation of the screening tool and its structuredresources; that the app provided a good user experience; that the app content helped with patient interactions; that the app was a good match for them to do the BI”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Coding categories described as both inductive and deductive

    Minor

    The results call acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility inductively coded categories, but the analysis section says those same categories were established in advance and coded deductively.

1 of 1

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 46 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Suleman, A., Mootz, J.J., Feliciano, P., Nicholson, P., O'Grady, M.A., Wall, M., Mandell, D., Stockton, M., Teodoro, E., Anube, A., Novela, A., Mocumbi, A.O., Gouveia, L., & Wainberg, M.L. (in press). Community implementation of SBIRT using technology for alcohol use reduction in Mozambique: Scale-up study protocol. Psychiatric Services.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
O'Grady, M. A., Mootz, J., Suleman, A., Sweetland, A., Teodoro, E., Anube, A., Feliciano, P., Bezuidenhout, C., Dos Santos, P. F., Fumo, W., Gouveia, L., Pinsky, I., Mello, M., Kann, B., & Wainberg, M. L.
Affiliations
  • New York State Psychiatric Institute (US)
  • Ministry of Health (MZ)
  • Foundation for Professional Development (ZA)
Venue
Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-03
Volume
134
Pages
108549
ISSN
0740-5472 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3176452398
Cited by
24
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1
FWCI
2.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (R01AA025947)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
Keywords
task shifting, alcoholism, brief motivational interviewing, health care access, psychiatric technicians, primary care providers, feasibility and acceptability, low- and middle-income countries, Mozambique, Nampula Province, internet access barriers
MeSH terms
Behavior Therapy, Humans, Mozambique, Technology, Telemedicine, Mobile Applications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-06.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-06.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review