Cited by 154Digital Mental Health InterventionsTelemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationMental Health Treatment and Access

Interest in behavioral and psychological treatments delivered face-to-face, by telephone, and by internet

Open access
Mohr, David C., Siddique, Juned, Ho, Joyce, Duffecy, Jenna, Jin, Ling, Fokuo, J. Konadu·2010·Annals of Behavioral Medicine

Abstract

Little is known about the acceptability of internet and telephone treatments, or what factors might influence patient interest in receiving treatments via these media. This study examined the level of interest in face-to-face, telephone, and internet treatment and factors that might influence that interest. Six hundred fifty-eight primary care patients were surveyed. Among patients interested in some form of behavioral treatment, 91.9% were interested or would consider face-to-face care compared to 62.4% for telephone and 48.0% for internet care. Symptom severity was unrelated to interest in treatment delivery medium. Interest in specific treatment targeting mental health, lifestyle, or pain was more strongly predictive of interest in face-to-face treatment than telephone or internet treatments. Only interest in lifestyle intervention was predictive of interest in internet-delivered treatment. Time constraints as a barrier were more predictive of interest in telephone and internet treatments compared to face-to-face. These findings provide some support for the notion that telephone and internet treatments may overcome barriers. People who seek help with lifestyle change may be more open to internet-delivered treatments, while interest in internet intervention does not appear to be associated with the desire for help in mental health, pain, or tobacco use. © 2010 The Society of Behavioral Medicine.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12160-010-9203-7

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

8 of 11 cited sources checked · 3 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Premisecitation

    Adherence to telephone treatments tends to be very good.

    “Adherence to telephone treatments tends to be very good (1).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [1] Mohr DC, Vella L, Hart S, Heckman T, Simon G. The effect of telephone-administered psychotherapy on symptoms of depression and attrition: A meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice. 2008; 15: 243-253. source
  • Premisecitation

    Adherence to standalone internet-delivered treatments remains very low.

    “Adherence to standalone internet delivered treatments (9, 10) remains very low.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [9] Eysenbach G. The law of attrition. J Med Internet Res. 2005; 7: e11. source
    • cites [10] Christensen H, Griffiths KM, Farrer L. Adherence in internet interventions for anxiety and depression. J Med Internet Res. 2009; 11: e13. source

      The Introduction and Discussion > Findings (page unavailable) describe poorer adherence on open-access websites than in trials, supporting concern about adherence in one setting. But the review reports relatively high treatment adherence—over 50%—in randomized trials and says Internet interventions are not inherently non-adherent. The blanket claim about standalone treatments is therefore broader than the evidence supports. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Findingown data

    Interest in lifestyle intervention was more predictive of interest in internet therapy than telephone therapy (p=.01).

    “Interest in lifestyle intervention was also more predictive of interest in internet therapy than telephone therapy (p=.01).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Interest in specific treatment targeting mental health, lifestyle, or pain was more strongly predictive of interest in face-to-face treatment than telephone or internet treatments.

    “Interest in specific treatment targeting mental health, lifestyle or pain was more strongly predictive of interest in face-to-face treatment than telephone or internet treatments.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Time Constraints as a barrier was more predictive of interest in telephone and internet treatments, compared to face-to-face.

    “Time Constraints as a barrier was more predictive of interest in telephone and internet treatments, compared to face-to-face.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims. 17
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 5
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Telephone-administered treatments have been shown to be effective for mental health problems, lifestyle interventions, smoking cessation, and pain management.

    “Telephone administered treatments have been shown to be effective for mental health problems (1), lifestyle (weight loss and exercise) interventions (2), smoking cessation (3), and pain management (4).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [1] Mohr DC, Vella L, Hart S, Heckman T, Simon G. The effect of telephone-administered psychotherapy on symptoms of depression and attrition: A meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice. 2008; 15: 243-253. source
    • cites [2] Pierce JP, Newman VA, Natarajan L, et al. Telephone counseling helps maintain long-term adherence to a high-vegetable dietary pattern. Journal of Nutrition. 2007; 137: 2291-2296. source

      The Discussion (page unavailable) says the telephone-counseling intervention produced sustained dietary behavior change, supporting effectiveness for a lifestyle intervention. But citation (2) is attached specifically to weight-loss and exercise interventions; this paper reports dietary change, not effectiveness for either of those outcomes. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [3] Curry SJ, McBride C, Grothaus LC, Louie D, Wagner EH. A randomized trial of self-help materials, personalized feedback, and telephone counseling with nonvolunteer smokers. Journal of Consulting and Counseling Psychology. 1995; 63: 1005-1014. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Internet-based interventions have been shown to be effective for mental health, lifestyle, smoking cessation, and pain management.

    “A growing body of research also supports the efficacy of internet-based interventions for these treatment targets (4–8).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 5 sources checked
    • cites [4] Hailey D, Roine R, Ohinmaa A. The effectiveness of telemental health applications: A review. Can J Psychiatry. 2008; 53: 769-778. source

      The Discussion reports evidence that Internet-based programs can improve a range of mental health conditions. The Smoking section says all smoking-cessation studies it reviewed used telephone-based technology, not Internet interventions. The passages do not establish efficacy for Internet-based lifestyle or pain-management interventions. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [5] Spek V, Cuijpers P, Nyklicek I, et al. Internet-based cognitive behaviour therapy for symptoms of depression and anxiety: A meta-analysis. Psychological Medicine. 2007; 37: 319-328. source

      The indexed Abstract reports that internet-based CBT improved symptoms of depression and anxiety compared with control conditions, supporting the mental-health part of the claim. It does not report efficacy for lifestyle interventions, smoking cessation, or pain management. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [6] Tate DF, Jackvony EH, Wing RR. A randomized trial comparing human e-mail counseling, computer-automated tailored counseling, and no counseling in an Internet weight loss program. Archives of Internal Medicine. 2006; 166: 1620-1625. source
    • cites [7] Bee PE, Bower P, Lovell K, et al. Psychotherapy mediated by remote communication technologies: A meta-analytic review. BMC Psychiatry. 2008; 8: 60. source

      The Background (page not available) describes promising results for non-face-to-face psychotherapy and discusses internet-based CBT for depression and anxiety. The Results report two internet-delivered studies among trials targeting mental health conditions. The paper does not establish efficacy for lifestyle change, smoking cessation, or pain management; its Methods explicitly exclude studies of addictions. (LLM, conf=0.87)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [8] Schulz PJ, Rubinell S, Hartung U. An internet-based approach to enhance self-managementof chronic low back pain in the italian-speaking population of Switzerland: Results from a pilot study. Int J Public Health. 2007; 52: 286-294. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    There were no effects of depression, anxiety, BMI, or smoking status on interest in a specific treatment delivery modality.

    “There were no effects of depression, anxiety, BMI or smoking status on interest in a specific treatment delivery modality.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Findingnone given

    658 primary care patients were surveyed.

    “658 primary care patients were surveyed.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Greater interest in mental health treatment was associated with greater interest in face-to-face care (OR=7.00, p<.0001) and telephone care (OR=2.69, p=.001), but not internet care (p=.69).

    “Greater interest in receiving mental health treatment was associated with greater interest in receiving care face-to-face (OR=7.00, p<.0001) and via telephone (OR=2.69, p=.001) but was not statistically related to interest in receiving care via the Internet (p=.69).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Greater interest in pain management was associated with greater interest in face-to-face care (OR=11.66, p=.001), but not telephone (p=.58) or internet (p=.26) care.

    “Greater interest in receiving pain management was associated with great interest in receiving care face-to-face (OR=11.66, p=.001), but not via telephone (p=.58) or internet (p=.26).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Greater interest in lifestyle treatment was associated with greater interest in face-to-face (OR=13.07, p<.0001), telephone (OR=3.12, p<.0001), and internet (OR=7.08, p<.0001) care.

    “Greater interest in receiving treatment focused on healthy lifestyle (diet and/or exercise) was associated with great interest in receiving care face-to-face (OR=13.07, p<.0001) via telephone (OR=3.12, p<.0001) and the internet (OR=7.08, p<.0001).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Greater age was associated with lower interest in face-to-face treatment (OR=.97, p=.02) and internet treatment (OR=.97, p=.004), but was unrelated to interest in telephone treatment (p=.52).

    “There were significant main effects for age such that greater age was associated with significantly lower interest in face-to-face (OR = .97; p = .02) and internet treatment (OR = .97; p = .004), but was unrelated to interest in telephone administered treatment (p =.52).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Interest in pain management treatment was more strongly predictive of interest in face-to-face treatment than telephone treatment (p=.007) and internet treatment (p=.02).

    “Interest in pain management treatment was more strongly predictive of interest in face-to-face treatment than telephone treatment (p=.007) and internet treatment (p=.02).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Greater problems with cost as a barrier were associated with greater interest in telephone (OR=1.38, p=.006) and internet (OR=1.45, p=.002) treatment, but not face-to-face (p=.30).

    “Greater problems with cost as a barrier were significantly associated with greater interest in receiving treatment by telephone (OR=1.38, p=.006) and by internet (OR=1.45, p=.002) but not face-to-face (p = .30).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Interest in mental health treatment is still strongly associated with greater desire for telephone-delivered therapy, but is unrelated to internet delivery.

    “However, interest in mental health treatment is still strongly associated with greater desire for telephone delivered therapy, but is unrelated to internet delivery.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Interest in lifestyle change is more strongly related to desire for face-to-face delivery, but it is also positively related to acceptance of both telephone and internet delivered services.

    “Interest in lifestyle change is more strongly related to desire for face-to-face delivery, but it is also positively related to acceptance of both telephone and internet delivered services.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    Interest in internet delivery is currently only associated with interest in lifestyle change, and is not associated with interest in services for mental health, pain management, or smoking cessation.

    “In contrast, interest in internet delivery is currently only associated with interest in lifestyle change, and is not associated with interest in services for mental health, pain management or smoking cessation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    There is openness to try newer treatment delivery media but not yet substantial demand.

    “This suggests that there is openness to try newer treatment delivery media but not yet substantial demand.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Patients who returned surveys were younger, less likely to be female, and more likely to be Caucasian than non-responders.

    “Patients who returned the packets were younger (53.2±16.4 for those not returning, p<.01), less likely to be female (73.0% for those not returning, p<.001), and varied by ethnicity such that Caucasians were more likely to return surveys compared to African-Americans and Hispanics (return rates 24.5%, 18.3%, 11.3%, respectively, p<.001).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    From 3265 mailings, 658 surveys (20.1%) were returned with signed consent documents.

    “From the 3265 mailings, 658 (20.1%) surveys were returned with signed consent documents.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The clinic draws from a very urban population, and these findings may not generalize to less urban or more rural settings.

    “The clinic, located in the heart of downtown Chicago, draws from a very urban population. These findings may not generalize to less urban or more rural settings.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    The measurement included many non-standardized measures, particularly those evaluating level of interest in treatment and treatment delivery media.

    “The measurement included many non-standardized measures, particularly those evaluating level of interest in treatment and treatment delivery media.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    At the time of the survey, interest in treatment for mental health and lifestyle change delivered by telephone may be acceptable to many patients, while interest in internet treatment is driven principally by interest in lifestyle change.

    “While these relationships will likely change with time, these findings suggest at the time of this survey, interest in treatment for mental health and lifestyle change delivered by telephone may be acceptable to many patients, while interest in internet treatment is driven principally by interest in lifestyle change.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The three treatment delivery media examined in this study are not mutually exclusive.

    “The three treatment delivery media examined in this study are not mutually exclusive.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    The measurement of barriers focused on barriers to face-to-face care, and telephone and internet treatments likely present unique barriers that were not measured.

    “The measurement of barriers focused on barriers to face-to-face care. Telephone and internet delivered treatments also likely present unique barriers that were not measured.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    These findings will likely become less accurate as time goes on, given how quickly new telecommunications technologies are penetrating the population and being adopted as vehicles for delivering health and mental health care.

    “These findings will likely become less accurate as time goes on, given how quickly new telecommunications technologies are penetrating the population and being adopted as vehicles for delivering health and mental health care.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
22 of 22
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Little is known about the acceptability of internet and telephone treatments, or what factors might influence patient interest in receiving treatments via these media.

    “Little is known about the acceptability of internet and telephone treatments, or what factors might influence patient interest in receiving treatments via these media.”
    “Little is known about the relative acceptability or level of interest in telephone- or internet-administered treatments, compared to traditional face-to-face delivered care.”
    “There is also virtually no information on what creates, supports or diminishes interest in receiving treatments via these different delivery media.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The notion that telephone and internet treatments will overcome barriers is largely untested.

    “This is potentially an important finding, in so far as the notion that the use of telephone and internet will overcome barriers is an assumption that remains largely untested (22).”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The three treatment delivery media examined in this study are not mutually exclusive.

    “The three treatment delivery media examined in this study are not mutually exclusive.”
3 of 3

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A US study in a primary care setting showed that patients were less interested in taking part in ICBT than face-to-face treatment.

    “Another example is a study from the US conducted in a primary care setting, which showed that patients were less interested in taking part in ICBT than facetoface treatment 103 .”

    From Internet-delivered psychological treatments: from innovation to implementation (2019) · cites this paper as [103]

    The Abstract (Methods and Results; page unavailable) reports a survey of 658 primary care patients and lower interest in internet-delivered care (48.3%) than face-to-face care (91.9%) among those interested in behavioral treatment. The paper compares delivery methods for behavioral and psychological treatments generally; these passages do not establish that the internet treatment was specifically ICBT. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Age and psychopathology were included as covariates in all models examining acceptability of iCBT.

    “Age and psychopathology were included as covariates in all models examining acceptability of iCBT, given their association with interest in Internet-based behavioral and psychological treatment (22, 26).”

    From Improving Acceptability and Uptake Behavior for Internet-Based Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy (2021) · cites this paper as [22]

    In Results > Predictors of Interest in Receiving Behavioral Services by Treatment Medium (page unavailable), greater age was associated with lower interest in internet-delivered treatment. The same section found no significant effect of depression or anxiety symptoms on interest in a treatment medium, so this source supports the age-related rationale but not the claimed association with psychopathology. It does not establish what covariates the citing authors included in their own iCBT models. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In a study of 658 primary care patients in the US, 91% would consider face-to-face treatment and only 48% internet treatment.

    “Mohr et al. reported a study on 658 primary care patients in the US who were asked about their interest in different treatment formats [21]. Results showed that 91% would consider face-to-face treatment and only 48% internet treatment.”

    From The promise and pitfalls of the internet for cognitive behavioral therapy (2010) · cites this paper as [21]

    The Abstract (Methods) reports a survey of 658 primary care patients. The Abstract (Results) reports 91.9% for face-to-face care and 48.3% for internet care, but those percentages apply only to patients interested in some form of behavioral treatment—not to all 658 patients, as the citing sentence implies. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Patients are more skeptical of internet-delivered CBT and may prefer face-to-face treatment.

    “while clinicians may hold positive attitudes towards internet-delivered CBT a recent study suggested that patients are more skeptical and may prefer face-to-face treatment.”

    From The promise and pitfalls of the internet for cognitive behavioral therapy (2010) · cites this paper as [21]

    The Abstract Results and Discussion report that primary care patients were more interested in face-to-face behavioral or psychological treatment than internet-delivered treatment. The study measured interest in delivery methods, however, not skepticism about internet-delivered CBT specifically. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Many people prefer face-to-face therapy over E-MH programs, despite viewing online programs as having advantages such as convenience.

    “Previous studies have reported that many people prefer face-to-face therapy over E-MH programs [8-10], despite viewing online programs as having advantages such as convenience [8].”

    From A brief intervention to increase uptake and adherence of an online program for depression and anxiety: Protocol for the Enhancing Engagement with Psychosocial Interventions (EEPI) Randomized Controlled Trial (2019) · cites this paper as [9]

    The Results report greater interest in face-to-face care (91.9%) than internet care (48.3%) among surveyed patients interested in behavioral treatment. The Results and Discussion also link time constraints to greater relative interest in internet treatment, but they do not report that patients viewed online programs as convenient or identified convenience as an advantage. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Abstract omits a reported pain-by-medium association

    Minor

    The abstract says symptom severity was unrelated to delivery medium, but the results report a significant differential effect for pain severity across media.

  • Definite-interest rates change between results and discussion

    Minor

    The discussion gives 17.4% for telephone and 9.7% for internet, whereas the results give 18.7% and 11.6%, respectively, for the same definite-interest categories.

2 of 2

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mohr, D. C., Siddique, J., Ho, J., Duffecy, J., Jin, L., & Fokuo, J. K.
Affiliations
Northwestern University (US)
Corresponding author
Mohr, David C.
Venue
Annals of Behavioral Medicine
Published
2010-07-21
Volume
40
Issue
1
Pages
89-98
ISSN
  • 0742-5554 (ISSN-L)
  • 0883-6612
  • 1532-4796
OpenAlex
W1973720661
Cited by
154
References
26
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 8
FWCI
13.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annals of Behavioral Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R34MH078922, R01MH059708)
  • National Center for Research Resources (UL1RR025741)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
internet-delivered treatment, face-to-face treatment, treatment acceptability, primary care patients, lifestyle intervention, psychotherapy, pain management, tobacco use, time constraints, barriers to treatment access
MeSH terms
Anxiety, Behavior Therapy, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Motivation, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Psychotherapy, Severity of Illness Index, Telephone, Therapy, Computer-Assisted, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-09-28.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-09-28.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review